Skip to main content

Understanding middlegames

Have you ever found yourself unable to find a move in the middlegame? Of course you have. We all have. About ten years ago, this was a recurring problem for me, which led to a lot of frustration. My conclusion was that I needed to learn how understand middlegames. So what better way than to read a book with the title Understanding Chess Middlegames? Sound like the perfect remedy, right? Ok, let's find out.

If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details.
 

What can you expect from this book?

I first read this book when I was just starting to study chess seriously. I bought it after reading a recommendation in an online forum. I would say this was ten years ago, but the book came out 2011, so it couldn't have been before that. Anyhow, my playing strength was probably around 1200 (I was unrated at the time) and I was having trouble choosing moves in non-tactical positions. Basically, I was playing without any kind of plan, and mostly without any positional understanding.

As I picked up the book, I saw that the book had a section that's called "When you can't think of a plan". Perfect! That's exactly my problem. So I flipped to page 52 and started reading. And I didn't understand a thing. There was just a short paragraph followed by a couple of annotated games. What's this? How is this supposed to help me?

I gave the book some more time, and got increasingly frustrated. Eventually, I concluded that the book was above my level, and I needed something else. So I put it away and continued my search for a good book. That's when I got The amateur's mind, which I have written about in a previous review.

I have learned a lot (?) about chess since then, and recently decided to give the book another chance. As I first read it, I didn't understand the point of the book, but now I do - I think.

The book has two initial chapters in which Nunn discusses some general aspects of middlegame theory. These are followed by the main body of the book. As the cover indicates, the book covers 100 middlegame ideas. These are clustered together in eight chapters:
  1. Material imbalances
  2. Strategy
  3. Activity
  4. Attacking play
  5. Defensive play
  6. Pawn-structure
  7. Typical central pawn-formations
  8. Typical mistakes
As the attentive reader will have figured out, there are 10-20 topics/ideas/concepts in each chapter (100 of them distributed over 8 chapters). Each topic features two annotated games which are covered on two pages. Many games are given in full, but not all. You can read an excerpt of the book on the publisher's homepage, and I think it gives a quite good impression of how the book is structured.

True to his habits, Nunn gives quite detailed annotations, and tends to present the key moves "in context" rather than snippets. Some readers prefer analyses to be presented this way. Personally, I think a book communicates more clearly if it only focuses on the key positions, ideas and variations. This also saves space and gives room for more goodness (see for instance Under the surface). So your reading experience will likely depend your preference in this regard.

Understanding chess middlegames is an ambitious book. Middlegames are complex and often difficult to explain. And covering 100 different ideas makes the challenge even bigger. I think Nunn deserves praise for taking on this challenge, but there are some downsides to this undertaking. First of all, it is hard to find 100 distinct middlegame ideas. And to be honest, there could be some debate on whether all of the topics are strictly middlegame ideas. I would argue that some are more tactical and some are psychological. 

But this is not my main quibble with this book. Rather, I think that two examples per topic is not always enough. It is difficult to convey the main learning points from such a small sample. Also, each topics span over just two pages, including the two games. This means that there is simply not enough room to explain the topics properly, which means that the readers will have to do a lot of the work on their own. Personally, I find that it can be quite difficult to extract the main points and learn something that can be applied in my own games. This being said, the games are well annotated and the book features many interesting and fascinating maneuvers, attacks and defenses.

I think Understanding chess middlegames is an interesting read, and if you are prepared to put in the work to really understand (no pun intended) the examples that are presented, you will probably learn a lot from it. However, if you are a bit lazy (like myself), you may find the book a bit superficial.

Who should read this book?

According to the back cover, the book contains "lessons that everyone can understand". While this may be true, I don't think this book is for everyone. As described above, I struggled with the book as a beginner. But as a seasoned patzer it is far more digestable. So this should probably not be your first chess book, but it may be a good read once you have established some basics of chess strategy. I would estimate that it is a good fit for readers with a playing strength in the 1500-1800 range.

About this book

Author:John Nunn
Title:Understanding chess middlegames
Type of book:Middlegame
Level:Intermediate
Labels:

Comments

  1. LBBMay 20, 2021 at 5:59 AM

    So far I've only read the introductory chapters and the first few lessons, so I can't contradict your review. But as someone with a 2000 rating, I find this book so far to be extremely instructive and entertaining. With only having read a small part, I already feel confident that your recommended rating range of 1500 to 1800 is off. I think even master-level players can get a lot out of the book. After all, the annotated games are between masters, and the players are making mistakes and Nunn is correcting their play.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular reviews

Rapid chess improvement

Would you like to gain 400 rating points in 400 days? That is what Michael de la Maza did. And he wrote a book about his progress and the methods that got him there. Quite an appealing idea, and many players at the beginner and intermediate level will be enticed. I was. Are you? In 2001, Michael de la Maza wrote an article in Chess horizons called "400 points in 400 days" . In the article, he outlines the main components of his training program and gives a short account of his own progress. He managed to to get from about 1300 to 2000 in just two years, which is quite an accomplishment. His ideas were later elaborated upon and presented in the book  Rapid chess improvement. This book was published quite a few years ago, and can be difficult to find. But it has been republished in a new form, together with two other books in A chess course: from beginner to winner . If you decide you want to buy Rapid chess improvement , this three-in-one volume may be a good option. ...
3 comments
Read more

Master of strategy

During the past two years, I’ve been working on improving my strategic/positional play. In this process, I have read a number of books, and two books that have long been on my reading list are the strategy books by Johan Hellsten. So when the Swedish chess federation requested reviewers for two of these books, I didn’t hesitate. I am happy that I was given the opportunity to review these books, and hope this review can be of help to you as a reader. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from these books? Johan Hellsten has created a name for himself as one of the leading experts of chess strategy in modern times. His series of strategy books ( Mastering Opening Strategy , Mastering Chess Strategy and Mastering Endgame Strategy ) have received glowing reviews from many parts of the chess world. So it feels good to finally dig into these nuggets. His endgame book is still in my boo...
Post a Comment
Read more

Attack the king

One of the finest chess books ever written. Those are tall words from the back cover of this classic book. But The art of attack in chess is one of those books that keep popping up in lists of best chess books. It is highly regarded by many players and trainers, so the initial statement is probably not all wrong. This is a book that has been on my reading list for several years, but it has taken some time for me to actually pick it up. I've been curious about what the hype is all about, and now that I've finally found out for myself, I am ready to share that insight with you. So let's dive in! What can you expect from this book? Before we begin, let me just get one detail out of the way. One thing that struck me when I picked up the book is the title, which seems to be missing a "the". When reading about the book online, it is referred to both with and without "the". When I looked up the original book (this one is a revised edition, edited by Joh...
3 comments
Read more

The best book for patzers?

I have been playing chess since I was a kid, but until about 10 years ago (2009), I had not even considered reading chess books. For some reason, this changed. I cannot remember why, but I decided I wanted to learn more about chess and probably pick up a book or two. I searched the Internet and consulted a few online chess forums, and was recommended the book The Amateur's Mind by Jeremy Silman. I bought the book, and that was the start of my growing collection of chess books. The Amateur's Mind has had a tremendous impact on my understanding of the game. Prior to Reading this book, I had no idea about how to evaluate a position or how to play the opening properly (or any other phase of the game, for that matter). I saw my results improving dramatically, and gained a couple of hundred rating points in just a few months. At this point, I only played online, so I did not have a "proper" rating. But regardless, I learned a lot from reading the book. What can y...
3 comments
Read more