Skip to main content

Lessons with a Grandmaster

If you had actual lessons with a grandmaster, would you be brave enough to publish the transcripts? Well, someone did. And that someone wrote about it in book form — three books, to be precise. In this review, I present my thoughts on the first book in the book series Lessons with a Grandmaster.

If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details.
Become a Patron! 

What can you expect from this book?

Lessons with a GM is written in collaboration between Boris Gulko and Joel Sneed. Gulko is a grandmaster who emigrated from the Soviet Union in the 1980s. According to Wikipedia, he is the only player to win the Soviet as well as US Chess championships. Sneed is a professor of psychology at Queens College in New York as well as an amateur player. 

In essence, this book is a game collection. There are 25 games in the book, all played by Gulko. There are some real heavyweights among his opponents, such as Kasparov, Karpov, Korchnoi, Seirawan, Yusupov, to name a few. However, the book differs from most game collections in a very interesting way; the annotations are made by both authors.

The basic premise is that Gulko presents his games and Sneed asks questions and suggests some lines. Of course, Gulko almost always finds something wrong with his co-writer's analyses. In that sense, the book has some resemblance to books like The Amateur's Mind and Heisman's The improving chess thinker. Here is an example of the exchanges between the authors.


Joel: Why not something simple like 11 b3 - ? There is no dark-squared bishop that might make this move dangerous.

Boris: White doesn't want to place his pawns on the same color as his bishop. Plus the game move might support a queenside pawn storm with the rook better placed on b1 than a1. Generally, there is not much difference between the two moves but 11 Rb1 allows more opportunity.

Joel: Now White cannot castle long. I like the plan of 11...d6, ...Be6, ... Rfc8, with play on the queenside.

Boris: The move you offered is inferior because of 11...d6 12 Nd5 Qd8 13 h4 and Black has simply lost time.


This kind of discussions is what sets this book apart from other game collections. I think it's a nice touch, and it enhances the instructional value of the book. Gulko highlights some typical mistakes in Sneed's analyses along with suggestions for how to improve on them. For the reader, this provides excellent learning opportunities, albeit not the same value as having a coach of your own.

Within each game, there are a number of exercises left for the reader, based on actual positions or analyses of the game. Gulko comments on this in the introduction:
At appropriate moments I will suggest assignments to find the right path. The assignments will be at five levels of difficulty. In each of the games, pose problems for you and the reader to solve, and you have been humble enough to make your thinking process known to everyone. I recommend that the reader solve these problems and to compare with both your analysis and mine. They will probably see similarities with your thinking process and my solutions are aimed to help correct the flaws in your reasoning.
After the presentation of each game, the authors provide a sort of summary where they reflect on what they find most interesting about it and what the main learning points are. I think that's a nice little feature.
 
In this case, the publisher has not provided a pdf sample, but you can take a peek via Amazon's "look inside" feature for more details.

In my review of Chess Fundamentals, I mentioned how I liked that Capablanca presents games he won and ones that he lost. This book does not fall into the same category. It is quite typical of many game collections; it only covers games that Gulko won. In my opinion, this is a weakness of this book. By showcasing some losses, the authors would have an opportunity to learn from typical (and even non-typical) mistakes. Frankly, many all of us would benefit from that.

If you are interested in taking a closer look at the games, I have collected all of them in a lichess study.

Lessons with a GM is a series of three volumes. I have only read the first one, which covers chess strategy and (supposedly) psychology. The second volume focuses on tactics and dynamic play and the third one is about combining tactics and strategy.

Who should read this book?

This book should be a good fit for players in the 1400-1800 range. It will be especially relevant for players who aim to improve their understanding of chess strategy. More advanced players might enjoy it for the games, but they will probably not get as much out of the annotations.

About this book

Author:Boris Gulko & Joel Sneed
Title:Lessons with a Grandmaster
Type of book:Chess improvement, Game collection
Level:Intermediate, (Advanced)
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular reviews

Judgement and planning

Some books "fly under the radar" and do not get the same attention as the evergreen classics. But sometimes, there is gold in old mines. And I found a little golden nugget while shopping for used books. A book written for amateurs, by (arguably) the best amateur of all time; former world champion Max Euwe. Sounds promising, right? If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from this book? In my previous review of Chess Fundamentals , said that few world champions have written books for beginners and intermediate players. Capablanca is, of course, one exception. And another is Max Euwe. Euwe is not the most well-known world champion. He was in his prime in the 1930s and 1940s, most notably in 1935 when he dethroned none other than the great Alexander Alekhine. Although many have suggested that Alekhine only lost because of heavy use of alcohol, beating him is no small feat (rega...
Post a Comment
Read more

Nunn’s secrets

Let me tell you a secret. There is no such thing as 'the best chess books'. It all depends on the preferences and expectations of the reader and of course the work s/he puts in when working with the book. So just because someone else claims that a certain book belongs in the 'best books of all time' category, it does not necessarily mean that it is a book that you will appreciate. This little intro may have given away the content of this review, but that's ok. Secrets of practical chess is an example of a book that has gotten a lot of praise on a more than one occasion. So let's dig in and see what the fuss is all about. What can you expect from this book? Secrets of practical chess has seemingly been well received in the chess world. Overall, the opinions are very positive. John Watson gave it a very positive review , and Jacob Aagaard has listed it among the top 10 books of the 20th century . It is also mentioned in another list of 'best' books ....
Post a Comment
Read more

Thoughts on chess improvement

I was recently interviewed by Kevin Scull  for his podcast  Chess Journeys: Tales of Adult Improvement . When I got the request, I started thinking about what I have to contribute with in terms of improvement advice for chess players. I ended up creating a mindmap of it all, and thought I would share it with you along with an elaboration of what it means. Three questions for you In my opinion, there are three main questions that you need to ask yourself in order to find your  path to chess improvement: Why am I doing this? What will I focus on? How will I study? I have tried (and failed) myself, many times. And what I've realized is that you cannot copy other people's plans for improvement; you need to create a personalized plan that is adapted to your goals, your needs and your general life situation. Don't copy other people's improvement plans Start with WHY I've seen a lot of adult players describe their chess goals. Almost all of them are defined in...
2 comments
Read more

Understanding middlegames

Have you ever found yourself unable to find a move in the middlegame? Of course you have. We all have. About ten years ago, this was a recurring problem for me, which led to a lot of frustration. My conclusion was that I needed to learn how understand middlegames. So what better way than to read a book with the title Understanding Chess Middlegames ? Sound like the perfect remedy, right? Ok, let's find out. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron!   What can you expect from this book? I first read this book when I was just starting to study chess seriously. I bought it after reading a recommendation in an online forum. I would say this was ten years ago, but the book came out 2011, so it couldn't have been before that. Anyhow, my playing strength was probably around 1200 (I was unrated at the time) and I was having trouble choosing moves in non-tactical positions. Basically, I was playing without ...
1 comment
Read more

Estimating playing strength

Have you ever felt like your chess rating doesn't represent your actual playing strength? Sometimes we want to be able to estimate playing strength based on individual games rather than rating (which changes more slowly). During the past few months, I've been taking a number of online courses and learning python for data analysis. In one of the courses, the final project allowed me to choose my own dataset. So surprise surprise! I chose something chess related. (Not really surprised, are you?) When we play games online, getting a computer evaluation is just a few clicks away. And a commonly used statistic is the average centipawn loss, or simply the average deviation from the computer's best move. Many of us tend to think that centipawn loss (CPL) is a good estimate of playing strength. And, of course, it gives some indication, but it's far from a perfect predictor. Fellow chess/statistics blogger Patrick Coulombe has investigated the correlation between rating and CPL ...
Post a Comment
Read more