Skip to main content

Lessons with a Grandmaster

If you had actual lessons with a grandmaster, would you be brave enough to publish the transcripts? Well, someone did. And that someone wrote about it in book form — three books, to be precise. In this review, I present my thoughts on the first book in the book series Lessons with a Grandmaster.

If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details.
Become a Patron! 

What can you expect from this book?

Lessons with a GM is written in collaboration between Boris Gulko and Joel Sneed. Gulko is a grandmaster who emigrated from the Soviet Union in the 1980s. According to Wikipedia, he is the only player to win the Soviet as well as US Chess championships. Sneed is a professor of psychology at Queens College in New York as well as an amateur player. 

In essence, this book is a game collection. There are 25 games in the book, all played by Gulko. There are some real heavyweights among his opponents, such as Kasparov, Karpov, Korchnoi, Seirawan, Yusupov, to name a few. However, the book differs from most game collections in a very interesting way; the annotations are made by both authors.

The basic premise is that Gulko presents his games and Sneed asks questions and suggests some lines. Of course, Gulko almost always finds something wrong with his co-writer's analyses. In that sense, the book has some resemblance to books like The Amateur's Mind and Heisman's The improving chess thinker. Here is an example of the exchanges between the authors.


Joel: Why not something simple like 11 b3 - ? There is no dark-squared bishop that might make this move dangerous.

Boris: White doesn't want to place his pawns on the same color as his bishop. Plus the game move might support a queenside pawn storm with the rook better placed on b1 than a1. Generally, there is not much difference between the two moves but 11 Rb1 allows more opportunity.

Joel: Now White cannot castle long. I like the plan of 11...d6, ...Be6, ... Rfc8, with play on the queenside.

Boris: The move you offered is inferior because of 11...d6 12 Nd5 Qd8 13 h4 and Black has simply lost time.


This kind of discussions is what sets this book apart from other game collections. I think it's a nice touch, and it enhances the instructional value of the book. Gulko highlights some typical mistakes in Sneed's analyses along with suggestions for how to improve on them. For the reader, this provides excellent learning opportunities, albeit not the same value as having a coach of your own.

Within each game, there are a number of exercises left for the reader, based on actual positions or analyses of the game. Gulko comments on this in the introduction:
At appropriate moments I will suggest assignments to find the right path. The assignments will be at five levels of difficulty. In each of the games, pose problems for you and the reader to solve, and you have been humble enough to make your thinking process known to everyone. I recommend that the reader solve these problems and to compare with both your analysis and mine. They will probably see similarities with your thinking process and my solutions are aimed to help correct the flaws in your reasoning.
After the presentation of each game, the authors provide a sort of summary where they reflect on what they find most interesting about it and what the main learning points are. I think that's a nice little feature.
 
In this case, the publisher has not provided a pdf sample, but you can take a peek via Amazon's "look inside" feature for more details.

In my review of Chess Fundamentals, I mentioned how I liked that Capablanca presents games he won and ones that he lost. This book does not fall into the same category. It is quite typical of many game collections; it only covers games that Gulko won. In my opinion, this is a weakness of this book. By showcasing some losses, the authors would have an opportunity to learn from typical (and even non-typical) mistakes. Frankly, many all of us would benefit from that.

If you are interested in taking a closer look at the games, I have collected all of them in a lichess study.

Lessons with a GM is a series of three volumes. I have only read the first one, which covers chess strategy and (supposedly) psychology. The second volume focuses on tactics and dynamic play and the third one is about combining tactics and strategy.

Who should read this book?

This book should be a good fit for players in the 1400-1800 range. It will be especially relevant for players who aim to improve their understanding of chess strategy. More advanced players might enjoy it for the games, but they will probably not get as much out of the annotations.

About this book

Author:Boris Gulko & Joel Sneed
Title:Lessons with a Grandmaster
Type of book:Chess improvement, Game collection
Level:Intermediate, (Advanced)
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular reviews

Under the surface

I did something different. I bought a chess book without doing any research. I decided to reward myself with a new book after having written ten reviews. So I asked my friends on Twitter for suggestions, and someone suggested that I take a look at the book Under the surface by Jan Markos. Since the book is quite new, I couldn't find much information about it, so I decided to blindly trust the recommendation. Luckily, I was not let down. What can you expect from this book? I am not the only one who has done something different. Jan Markos did the same when he wrote Under the surface . He takes a quite philosophical approach to chess, which should probably be expected from a former student of philosophy. This comes across quite clearly in his choice of chapter titles. The names "Magnetic Skin", "Anatoly Karpov's Billiard Balls" and "On the Breaking Ice" are not the most transparent chapter titles in the world. But once you get under the surfa
Post a Comment
Read more

Tactics for post-scratch players

Which is the best chess book ever? As a chess community, we repeatedly ask this kind of question, for various categories. And one of those categories is, of course, tactics. So which is the best tactics book ever? The answer to this question depends on the playing strength of the reader. But if we consider the fact that the majority of chess players are in the middle of the bell curve, the best books should logically be among the ones written for an intermediate audience. With that said, this might be the best tactics book ever written. A bold statement, perhaps. Read on to find out why I recommend this book. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from this book? Chess tactics from scratch was originally published as Understanding Chess Tactics  – as indicated by the book's subtitle. This book is actually what inspired the now famous "woodpecker method". In his book Pu
Post a Comment
Read more

Judgement and planning

Some books "fly under the radar" and do not get the same attention as the evergreen classics. But sometimes, there is gold in old mines. And I found a little golden nugget while shopping for used books. A book written for amateurs, by (arguably) the best amateur of all time; former world champion Max Euwe. Sounds promising, right? If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from this book? In my previous review of Chess Fundamentals , said that few world champions have written books for beginners and intermediate players. Capablanca is, of course, one exception. And another is Max Euwe. Euwe is not the most well-known world champion. He was in his prime in the 1930s and 1940s, most notably in 1935 when he dethroned none other than the great Alexander Alekhine. Although many have suggested that Alekhine only lost because of heavy use of alcohol, beating him is no small feat (rega
Post a Comment
Read more

Master of strategy

During the past two years, I’ve been working on improving my strategic/positional play. In this process, I have read a number of books, and two books that have long been on my reading list are the strategy books by Johan Hellsten. So when the Swedish chess federation requested reviewers for two of these books, I didn’t hesitate. I am happy that I was given the opportunity to review these books, and hope this review can be of help to you as a reader. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from these books? Johan Hellsten has created a name for himself as one of the leading experts of chess strategy in modern times. His series of strategy books ( Mastering Opening Strategy , Mastering Chess Strategy and Mastering Endgame Strategy ) have received glowing reviews from many parts of the chess world. So it feels good to finally dig into these nuggets. His endgame book is still in my boo
Post a Comment
Read more

All by myself

How do I study chess in the most effective way? This is a question most chess players ask themselves at some point. Once in a while there comes a book that promises to deliver the definitive answer. And just a few months ago, such a book came out; How to study chess on your own . With such a title, this is a book that I just had to read. Should you read it too? In order to answer that, I think you should read this review and figure it out for yourself. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron!   What can you expect from this book? Like many other books, the first time I heard about How to study chess on your own  was on the perpetual chess podcast that featured an interview with author Davorin Kuljasevic . The interview made me curious about the book, so I decided to get it. How to study chess on your own  is a big book. It has 380 pages that spans 9 chapters (plus solutions), 71 annotated games and 34 tests o
Post a Comment
Read more