Skip to main content

Lessons with a Grandmaster

If you had actual lessons with a grandmaster, would you be brave enough to publish the transcripts? Well, someone did. And that someone wrote about it in book form — three books, to be precise. In this review, I present my thoughts on the first book in the book series Lessons with a Grandmaster.

If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details.
Become a Patron! 

What can you expect from this book?

Lessons with a GM is written in collaboration between Boris Gulko and Joel Sneed. Gulko is a grandmaster who emigrated from the Soviet Union in the 1980s. According to Wikipedia, he is the only player to win the Soviet as well as US Chess championships. Sneed is a professor of psychology at Queens College in New York as well as an amateur player. 

In essence, this book is a game collection. There are 25 games in the book, all played by Gulko. There are some real heavyweights among his opponents, such as Kasparov, Karpov, Korchnoi, Seirawan, Yusupov, to name a few. However, the book differs from most game collections in a very interesting way; the annotations are made by both authors.

The basic premise is that Gulko presents his games and Sneed asks questions and suggests some lines. Of course, Gulko almost always finds something wrong with his co-writer's analyses. In that sense, the book has some resemblance to books like The Amateur's Mind and Heisman's The improving chess thinker. Here is an example of the exchanges between the authors.


Joel: Why not something simple like 11 b3 - ? There is no dark-squared bishop that might make this move dangerous.

Boris: White doesn't want to place his pawns on the same color as his bishop. Plus the game move might support a queenside pawn storm with the rook better placed on b1 than a1. Generally, there is not much difference between the two moves but 11 Rb1 allows more opportunity.

Joel: Now White cannot castle long. I like the plan of 11...d6, ...Be6, ... Rfc8, with play on the queenside.

Boris: The move you offered is inferior because of 11...d6 12 Nd5 Qd8 13 h4 and Black has simply lost time.


This kind of discussions is what sets this book apart from other game collections. I think it's a nice touch, and it enhances the instructional value of the book. Gulko highlights some typical mistakes in Sneed's analyses along with suggestions for how to improve on them. For the reader, this provides excellent learning opportunities, albeit not the same value as having a coach of your own.

Within each game, there are a number of exercises left for the reader, based on actual positions or analyses of the game. Gulko comments on this in the introduction:
At appropriate moments I will suggest assignments to find the right path. The assignments will be at five levels of difficulty. In each of the games, pose problems for you and the reader to solve, and you have been humble enough to make your thinking process known to everyone. I recommend that the reader solve these problems and to compare with both your analysis and mine. They will probably see similarities with your thinking process and my solutions are aimed to help correct the flaws in your reasoning.
After the presentation of each game, the authors provide a sort of summary where they reflect on what they find most interesting about it and what the main learning points are. I think that's a nice little feature.
 
In this case, the publisher has not provided a pdf sample, but you can take a peek via Amazon's "look inside" feature for more details.

In my review of Chess Fundamentals, I mentioned how I liked that Capablanca presents games he won and ones that he lost. This book does not fall into the same category. It is quite typical of many game collections; it only covers games that Gulko won. In my opinion, this is a weakness of this book. By showcasing some losses, the authors would have an opportunity to learn from typical (and even non-typical) mistakes. Frankly, many all of us would benefit from that.

If you are interested in taking a closer look at the games, I have collected all of them in a lichess study.

Lessons with a GM is a series of three volumes. I have only read the first one, which covers chess strategy and (supposedly) psychology. The second volume focuses on tactics and dynamic play and the third one is about combining tactics and strategy.

Who should read this book?

This book should be a good fit for players in the 1400-1800 range. It will be especially relevant for players who aim to improve their understanding of chess strategy. More advanced players might enjoy it for the games, but they will probably not get as much out of the annotations.

About this book

Author:Boris Gulko & Joel Sneed
Title:Lessons with a Grandmaster
Type of book:Chess improvement, Game collection
Level:Intermediate, (Advanced)
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular reviews

Under the surface

I did something different. I bought a chess book without doing any research. I decided to reward myself with a new book after having written ten reviews. So I asked my friends on Twitter for suggestions, and someone suggested that I take a look at the book Under the surface by Jan Markos. Since the book is quite new, I couldn't find much information about it, so I decided to blindly trust the recommendation. Luckily, I was not let down. What can you expect from this book? I am not the only one who has done something different. Jan Markos did the same when he wrote Under the surface . He takes a quite philosophical approach to chess, which should probably be expected from a former student of philosophy. This comes across quite clearly in his choice of chapter titles. The names "Magnetic Skin", "Anatoly Karpov's Billiard Balls" and "On the Breaking Ice" are not the most transparent chapter titles in the world. But once you get under the surfa...
Post a Comment
Read more

Master of strategy

During the past two years, I’ve been working on improving my strategic/positional play. In this process, I have read a number of books, and two books that have long been on my reading list are the strategy books by Johan Hellsten. So when the Swedish chess federation requested reviewers for two of these books, I didn’t hesitate. I am happy that I was given the opportunity to review these books, and hope this review can be of help to you as a reader. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from these books? Johan Hellsten has created a name for himself as one of the leading experts of chess strategy in modern times. His series of strategy books ( Mastering Opening Strategy , Mastering Chess Strategy and Mastering Endgame Strategy ) have received glowing reviews from many parts of the chess world. So it feels good to finally dig into these nuggets. His endgame book is still in my boo...
Post a Comment
Read more

The best book for patzers?

I have been playing chess since I was a kid, but until about 10 years ago (2009), I had not even considered reading chess books. For some reason, this changed. I cannot remember why, but I decided I wanted to learn more about chess and probably pick up a book or two. I searched the Internet and consulted a few online chess forums, and was recommended the book The Amateur's Mind by Jeremy Silman. I bought the book, and that was the start of my growing collection of chess books. The Amateur's Mind has had a tremendous impact on my understanding of the game. Prior to Reading this book, I had no idea about how to evaluate a position or how to play the opening properly (or any other phase of the game, for that matter). I saw my results improving dramatically, and gained a couple of hundred rating points in just a few months. At this point, I only played online, so I did not have a "proper" rating. But regardless, I learned a lot from reading the book. What can y...
3 comments
Read more

My system should be your system?

One of the greates classics of chess literature. That's at least what it says on the cover. But let's not judge a book by the cover. Instead, we could listen to what others have said about this book. In his review of My system , John Watson writes: "We no longer consider many classics to be essential to a chess education, not since the Internet; but if there’s an exception, Nimzowitch’s work is it". These are big words from a big man. Watson is an authority of chess theory, so his evaluation should not be taken too lightly. Although My system has frequently been mentioned among the greatest books of all time, and has been recommended by many players , it has also been the subject of controversy. Of course, when the book was first published (almost 100 years ago), many ideas in the book challenged many of the established principles of chess theory at the time, and other authorities dismissed the ideas. But also to this day, many people are unimpressed with the b...
Post a Comment
Read more

Think first or think later? - part 1

This is a different kind of review. It's not just a review of one book, but two (actually three). Therefore, it's written in two parts, and this is part 1. I have chosen the book Move first, think later by Willy Hendriks and Understanding before moving by Herman Grooten (which is actually a series, with two books so far). The main reason I chose these books is that the titles indicate completely opposite views of how to approach chess: Think before you move or just move and think later. So how should a patzer like me make sense of this? I read the book on Forward Chess , which was a new experience for me. The service is available for various operative systems. I used the app on my iPad. One advantage is that it allows you to click through the variations instead of just visualizing them in your head. You can of course skip this, if you want to train your visualization skills. Another good thing is that you can try out various moves that are not in the book and switch on an ...
2 comments
Read more