Skip to main content

Understanding middlegames

Have you ever found yourself unable to find a move in the middlegame? Of course you have. We all have. About ten years ago, this was a recurring problem for me, which led to a lot of frustration. My conclusion was that I needed to learn how understand middlegames. So what better way than to read a book with the title Understanding Chess Middlegames? Sound like the perfect remedy, right? Ok, let's find out.

If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details.
 

What can you expect from this book?

I first read this book when I was just starting to study chess seriously. I bought it after reading a recommendation in an online forum. I would say this was ten years ago, but the book came out 2011, so it couldn't have been before that. Anyhow, my playing strength was probably around 1200 (I was unrated at the time) and I was having trouble choosing moves in non-tactical positions. Basically, I was playing without any kind of plan, and mostly without any positional understanding.

As I picked up the book, I saw that the book had a section that's called "When you can't think of a plan". Perfect! That's exactly my problem. So I flipped to page 52 and started reading. And I didn't understand a thing. There was just a short paragraph followed by a couple of annotated games. What's this? How is this supposed to help me?

I gave the book some more time, and got increasingly frustrated. Eventually, I concluded that the book was above my level, and I needed something else. So I put it away and continued my search for a good book. That's when I got The amateur's mind, which I have written about in a previous review.

I have learned a lot (?) about chess since then, and recently decided to give the book another chance. As I first read it, I didn't understand the point of the book, but now I do - I think.

The book has two initial chapters in which Nunn discusses some general aspects of middlegame theory. These are followed by the main body of the book. As the cover indicates, the book covers 100 middlegame ideas. These are clustered together in eight chapters:
  1. Material imbalances
  2. Strategy
  3. Activity
  4. Attacking play
  5. Defensive play
  6. Pawn-structure
  7. Typical central pawn-formations
  8. Typical mistakes
As the attentive reader will have figured out, there are 10-20 topics/ideas/concepts in each chapter (100 of them distributed over 8 chapters). Each topic features two annotated games which are covered on two pages. Many games are given in full, but not all. You can read an excerpt of the book on the publisher's homepage, and I think it gives a quite good impression of how the book is structured.

True to his habits, Nunn gives quite detailed annotations, and tends to present the key moves "in context" rather than snippets. Some readers prefer analyses to be presented this way. Personally, I think a book communicates more clearly if it only focuses on the key positions, ideas and variations. This also saves space and gives room for more goodness (see for instance Under the surface). So your reading experience will likely depend your preference in this regard.

Understanding chess middlegames is an ambitious book. Middlegames are complex and often difficult to explain. And covering 100 different ideas makes the challenge even bigger. I think Nunn deserves praise for taking on this challenge, but there are some downsides to this undertaking. First of all, it is hard to find 100 distinct middlegame ideas. And to be honest, there could be some debate on whether all of the topics are strictly middlegame ideas. I would argue that some are more tactical and some are psychological. 

But this is not my main quibble with this book. Rather, I think that two examples per topic is not always enough. It is difficult to convey the main learning points from such a small sample. Also, each topics span over just two pages, including the two games. This means that there is simply not enough room to explain the topics properly, which means that the readers will have to do a lot of the work on their own. Personally, I find that it can be quite difficult to extract the main points and learn something that can be applied in my own games. This being said, the games are well annotated and the book features many interesting and fascinating maneuvers, attacks and defenses.

I think Understanding chess middlegames is an interesting read, and if you are prepared to put in the work to really understand (no pun intended) the examples that are presented, you will probably learn a lot from it. However, if you are a bit lazy (like myself), you may find the book a bit superficial.

Who should read this book?

According to the back cover, the book contains "lessons that everyone can understand". While this may be true, I don't think this book is for everyone. As described above, I struggled with the book as a beginner. But as a seasoned patzer it is far more digestable. So this should probably not be your first chess book, but it may be a good read once you have established some basics of chess strategy. I would estimate that it is a good fit for readers with a playing strength in the 1500-1800 range.

About this book

Author:John Nunn
Title:Understanding chess middlegames
Type of book:Middlegame
Level:Intermediate
Labels:

Comments

  1. LBBMay 20, 2021 at 5:59 AM

    So far I've only read the introductory chapters and the first few lessons, so I can't contradict your review. But as someone with a 2000 rating, I find this book so far to be extremely instructive and entertaining. With only having read a small part, I already feel confident that your recommended rating range of 1500 to 1800 is off. I think even master-level players can get a lot out of the book. After all, the annotated games are between masters, and the players are making mistakes and Nunn is correcting their play.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular reviews

Estimating playing strength

Have you ever felt like your chess rating doesn't represent your actual playing strength? Sometimes we want to be able to estimate playing strength based on individual games rather than rating (which changes more slowly). During the past few months, I've been taking a number of online courses and learning python for data analysis. In one of the courses, the final project allowed me to choose my own dataset. So surprise surprise! I chose something chess related. (Not really surprised, are you?) When we play games online, getting a computer evaluation is just a few clicks away. And a commonly used statistic is the average centipawn loss, or simply the average deviation from the computer's best move. Many of us tend to think that centipawn loss (CPL) is a good estimate of playing strength. And, of course, it gives some indication, but it's far from a perfect predictor. Fellow chess/statistics blogger Patrick Coulombe has investigated the correlation between rating and CPL ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Questions of modern chess theory

A Soviet classic - that's what it says on the front cover. And for good reason, I think. At the beginning of this year, I decided I would invest some time studying strategy books. I already had a number of them in my collection, and then I stumbled upon a thread in the facebook group ”chess book collectors”. The post contained some controversial claims about the book Question of modern chess theory , which was unfamiliar to me at the time. The post and the ensuing discussions piqued my interest, and I decided to check it out. After some research, I realized that this was a stepping stone for many other books, so I put it at the top of my reading list. I read it during the summer, but haven't got around to writing a review before now. So I actually had to read it again. Anywho, I am finally ready to share my thoughts with the world. Hope you enjoy it. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! Wha...
Post a Comment
Read more

Blindfold chess

Are you impressed by people who can play chess without seeing the board? For the uninitiated, this is a very impressive display of skill. But it is a skill that can be learned, and you don’t need to be a grandmaster to achieve it. The trick is to start small, with few pieces on the board - or in a diagram. In this review, I will discuss a book that can help you on the way to becoming a blindfold chess wiz.   If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from this book? A few years ago, my chess club arranged a small chess display in a local shopping centre. One of the things we did was having someone playing blindfolded against one of the spectators. People around the table were completely blown away by this, and many even asked if it was a trick. (It’s not!) Although blindfold chess seems amazing, even impossible, to some people, it is a skill that is very attainable. I would even c...
Post a Comment
Read more

Lessons with a Grandmaster

If you had actual lessons with a grandmaster, would you be brave enough to publish the transcripts? Well, someone did. And that someone wrote about it in book form — three books, to be precise. In this review, I present my thoughts on the first book in the book series Lessons with a Grandmaster . If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron!   What can you expect from this book? Lessons with a GM  is written in collaboration between Boris Gulko and Joel Sneed. Gulko is a grandmaster who emigrated from the Soviet Union in the 1980s. According to Wikipedia, he is the only player to win the Soviet as well as US Chess championships. Sneed is a professor of psychology at Queens College in New York as well as an amateur player.  In essence, this book is a game collection. There are 25 games in the book, all played by Gulko. There are some real heavyweights among his opponents, such as Kasparov, Karpov,...
Post a Comment
Read more