Skip to main content

Understanding middlegames

Have you ever found yourself unable to find a move in the middlegame? Of course you have. We all have. About ten years ago, this was a recurring problem for me, which led to a lot of frustration. My conclusion was that I needed to learn how understand middlegames. So what better way than to read a book with the title Understanding Chess Middlegames? Sound like the perfect remedy, right? Ok, let's find out.

If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details.
 

What can you expect from this book?

I first read this book when I was just starting to study chess seriously. I bought it after reading a recommendation in an online forum. I would say this was ten years ago, but the book came out 2011, so it couldn't have been before that. Anyhow, my playing strength was probably around 1200 (I was unrated at the time) and I was having trouble choosing moves in non-tactical positions. Basically, I was playing without any kind of plan, and mostly without any positional understanding.

As I picked up the book, I saw that the book had a section that's called "When you can't think of a plan". Perfect! That's exactly my problem. So I flipped to page 52 and started reading. And I didn't understand a thing. There was just a short paragraph followed by a couple of annotated games. What's this? How is this supposed to help me?

I gave the book some more time, and got increasingly frustrated. Eventually, I concluded that the book was above my level, and I needed something else. So I put it away and continued my search for a good book. That's when I got The amateur's mind, which I have written about in a previous review.

I have learned a lot (?) about chess since then, and recently decided to give the book another chance. As I first read it, I didn't understand the point of the book, but now I do - I think.

The book has two initial chapters in which Nunn discusses some general aspects of middlegame theory. These are followed by the main body of the book. As the cover indicates, the book covers 100 middlegame ideas. These are clustered together in eight chapters:
  1. Material imbalances
  2. Strategy
  3. Activity
  4. Attacking play
  5. Defensive play
  6. Pawn-structure
  7. Typical central pawn-formations
  8. Typical mistakes
As the attentive reader will have figured out, there are 10-20 topics/ideas/concepts in each chapter (100 of them distributed over 8 chapters). Each topic features two annotated games which are covered on two pages. Many games are given in full, but not all. You can read an excerpt of the book on the publisher's homepage, and I think it gives a quite good impression of how the book is structured.

True to his habits, Nunn gives quite detailed annotations, and tends to present the key moves "in context" rather than snippets. Some readers prefer analyses to be presented this way. Personally, I think a book communicates more clearly if it only focuses on the key positions, ideas and variations. This also saves space and gives room for more goodness (see for instance Under the surface). So your reading experience will likely depend your preference in this regard.

Understanding chess middlegames is an ambitious book. Middlegames are complex and often difficult to explain. And covering 100 different ideas makes the challenge even bigger. I think Nunn deserves praise for taking on this challenge, but there are some downsides to this undertaking. First of all, it is hard to find 100 distinct middlegame ideas. And to be honest, there could be some debate on whether all of the topics are strictly middlegame ideas. I would argue that some are more tactical and some are psychological. 

But this is not my main quibble with this book. Rather, I think that two examples per topic is not always enough. It is difficult to convey the main learning points from such a small sample. Also, each topics span over just two pages, including the two games. This means that there is simply not enough room to explain the topics properly, which means that the readers will have to do a lot of the work on their own. Personally, I find that it can be quite difficult to extract the main points and learn something that can be applied in my own games. This being said, the games are well annotated and the book features many interesting and fascinating maneuvers, attacks and defenses.

I think Understanding chess middlegames is an interesting read, and if you are prepared to put in the work to really understand (no pun intended) the examples that are presented, you will probably learn a lot from it. However, if you are a bit lazy (like myself), you may find the book a bit superficial.

Who should read this book?

According to the back cover, the book contains "lessons that everyone can understand". While this may be true, I don't think this book is for everyone. As described above, I struggled with the book as a beginner. But as a seasoned patzer it is far more digestable. So this should probably not be your first chess book, but it may be a good read once you have established some basics of chess strategy. I would estimate that it is a good fit for readers with a playing strength in the 1500-1800 range.

About this book

Author:John Nunn
Title:Understanding chess middlegames
Type of book:Middlegame
Level:Intermediate
Labels:

Comments

  1. LBBMay 20, 2021 at 5:59 AM

    So far I've only read the introductory chapters and the first few lessons, so I can't contradict your review. But as someone with a 2000 rating, I find this book so far to be extremely instructive and entertaining. With only having read a small part, I already feel confident that your recommended rating range of 1500 to 1800 is off. I think even master-level players can get a lot out of the book. After all, the annotated games are between masters, and the players are making mistakes and Nunn is correcting their play.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular reviews

Judgement and planning

Some books "fly under the radar" and do not get the same attention as the evergreen classics. But sometimes, there is gold in old mines. And I found a little golden nugget while shopping for used books. A book written for amateurs, by (arguably) the best amateur of all time; former world champion Max Euwe. Sounds promising, right? If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from this book? In my previous review of Chess Fundamentals , said that few world champions have written books for beginners and intermediate players. Capablanca is, of course, one exception. And another is Max Euwe. Euwe is not the most well-known world champion. He was in his prime in the 1930s and 1940s, most notably in 1935 when he dethroned none other than the great Alexander Alekhine. Although many have suggested that Alekhine only lost because of heavy use of alcohol, beating him is no small feat (rega...
Post a Comment
Read more

Nunn’s secrets

Let me tell you a secret. There is no such thing as 'the best chess books'. It all depends on the preferences and expectations of the reader and of course the work s/he puts in when working with the book. So just because someone else claims that a certain book belongs in the 'best books of all time' category, it does not necessarily mean that it is a book that you will appreciate. This little intro may have given away the content of this review, but that's ok. Secrets of practical chess is an example of a book that has gotten a lot of praise on a more than one occasion. So let's dig in and see what the fuss is all about. What can you expect from this book? Secrets of practical chess has seemingly been well received in the chess world. Overall, the opinions are very positive. John Watson gave it a very positive review , and Jacob Aagaard has listed it among the top 10 books of the 20th century . It is also mentioned in another list of 'best' books ....
Post a Comment
Read more

Thoughts on chess improvement

I was recently interviewed by Kevin Scull  for his podcast  Chess Journeys: Tales of Adult Improvement . When I got the request, I started thinking about what I have to contribute with in terms of improvement advice for chess players. I ended up creating a mindmap of it all, and thought I would share it with you along with an elaboration of what it means. Three questions for you In my opinion, there are three main questions that you need to ask yourself in order to find your  path to chess improvement: Why am I doing this? What will I focus on? How will I study? I have tried (and failed) myself, many times. And what I've realized is that you cannot copy other people's plans for improvement; you need to create a personalized plan that is adapted to your goals, your needs and your general life situation. Don't copy other people's improvement plans Start with WHY I've seen a lot of adult players describe their chess goals. Almost all of them are defined in...
2 comments
Read more

Lessons from a legend

What if you could get chess lessons from a former world champion? Would you say yes? This is a question that Kostya Kavutskiy asked in a recent video . I decided to accept that offer, and during the past few weeks, I've spent some quality time with the third world champion, José Capablanca. In his 100 year old book, he outlines some of the most important principles of chess. If you haven't already read this book, maybe you should? Hopefully, this review will help to decide if this book is for you. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron!   What can you expect from this book? Several world champions (most of them?) have written books for advanced players. Capablanca is one of the few who have written chess books for beginners and intermediate players. And his book Chess Fundamentals  is a classic introductory book. Many people have recommended it, and I've had it on my reading list for a long time...
Post a Comment
Read more

My system should be your system?

One of the greates classics of chess literature. That's at least what it says on the cover. But let's not judge a book by the cover. Instead, we could listen to what others have said about this book. In his review of My system , John Watson writes: "We no longer consider many classics to be essential to a chess education, not since the Internet; but if there’s an exception, Nimzowitch’s work is it". These are big words from a big man. Watson is an authority of chess theory, so his evaluation should not be taken too lightly. Although My system has frequently been mentioned among the greatest books of all time, and has been recommended by many players , it has also been the subject of controversy. Of course, when the book was first published (almost 100 years ago), many ideas in the book challenged many of the established principles of chess theory at the time, and other authorities dismissed the ideas. But also to this day, many people are unimpressed with the b...
Post a Comment
Read more