Chaos on the board

Have you ever felt tired of chess? Maybe you’ve been uninspired or perhaps you think it’s too much work. To paraphrase a famous movie: All work and no play makes you a dull person. If that is the case, I may have a cure. You need a fun chess book. Something that will rekindle your joy for the game and inspire you to play creatively. I give you Tiger’s Chaos Theory!

This book found me at a time when I needed it the most. My inspiration and motivation to study chess was way down. And like a bolt from the blue, the Swedish Chess Federation approached me and wanted me to review this book. And the kind people at Quality Chess agreed to send me a review copy. An offer I couldn't refuse. So after this happy turn of events, I have a new review for you.

If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details.
Become a Patron!

What can you expect from this book?

Grandmaster Tiger Hillarp Persson, a multi-time Swedish chess champion, has already made his mark as an author with two books on his favorite opening, the Modern. But in Tiger’s Chaos Theory, he breaks away from opening theory entirely to challenge how we think about chess itself. This isn’t your typical training manual – it’s more of an invitation to rethink the rules and get inspired.

At its core, Tiger’s Chaos Theory is about chess improvement, but it defies tradition. There’s no walkthrough of openings, strategies, or endgames here, and definitely no puzzles. Instead, Tiger leads us through ten chapters of pure chess inspiration, packed with games featuring everything from dubious sacrifices to tactical and positional brilliance. With a selection of elite-level games—split between his own and his peers’—Tiger gives us a front-row seat to both creativity and chaos on the board.

What started out as a book about creativity ended up as something else – but not quite.

As far as I understand, Tiger was requested to write a book about creativity in chess, but the book ended up as something far more than that. In the book, Tiger questions many of the received “truths” about chess. Unlike the masters of the past, he argues that the game cannot be reduced to something strictly logical. He also claims that chess principles often contradict one another and can be more of a hindrance than a help if you follow them too rigidly. A simple example is that rooks belong on open files, but also behind passed pawns, and on the seventh rank. All good advice, but they can’t all apply at once. This, Tiger argues, is why we need to use these principles as rough guidelines, allowing intuition to take the lead when necessary. Breaking the rules, he suggests, is often the way forward.

In many ways, Tiger’s Chaos Theory has the same feel as Under the Surface by Jan Markos. If these two authors were to team up, they’d either create a masterpiece or get so lost in philosophy they’d never make it to print. But if you enjoy books that make you think as much as they improve your play, this one will be right up your alley. Among other things, Tiger suggests that every player keep a collection of intriguing games – this book itself is a great start, filled with examples that will inspire you to play more creatively. I have enjoyed this book a lot, and recommend it wholeheartedly.

Who should read this book?

Tiger’s Chaos Theory is an engaging, enjoyable read – one best taken in by a fireside, perhaps with a favorite drink in hand. But don’t let the laid-back tone fool you; this book demands focus. It’s aimed at advanced players, ideally those with a solid grasp of tactics and strategy. The analysis is detailed, and keeping up with the nuances will challenge even seasoned players. To get the most out of it, a rating of 2000 or higher is recommended, but ambitious players with lower ratings will still find much to enjoy – if they’re ready to take on a challenge. So, if you’re looking to push the boundaries of your game, this book might just be your ticket.

About this book

Author:	Tiger Hillarp Persson
Title:	Tiger's Chaos Theory
Type of book:	Chess improvement, Miscellaneous
Level:	Advanced

Comments

Popular reviews

Judgement and planning

Some books "fly under the radar" and do not get the same attention as the evergreen classics. But sometimes, there is gold in old mines. And I found a little golden nugget while shopping for used books. A book written for amateurs, by (arguably) the best amateur of all time; former world champion Max Euwe. Sounds promising, right? If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from this book? In my previous review of Chess Fundamentals , said that few world champions have written books for beginners and intermediate players. Capablanca is, of course, one exception. And another is Max Euwe. Euwe is not the most well-known world champion. He was in his prime in the 1930s and 1940s, most notably in 1935 when he dethroned none other than the great Alexander Alekhine. Although many have suggested that Alekhine only lost because of heavy use of alcohol, beating him is no small feat (rega...

Nunn’s secrets

Let me tell you a secret. There is no such thing as 'the best chess books'. It all depends on the preferences and expectations of the reader and of course the work s/he puts in when working with the book. So just because someone else claims that a certain book belongs in the 'best books of all time' category, it does not necessarily mean that it is a book that you will appreciate. This little intro may have given away the content of this review, but that's ok. Secrets of practical chess is an example of a book that has gotten a lot of praise on a more than one occasion. So let's dig in and see what the fuss is all about. What can you expect from this book? Secrets of practical chess has seemingly been well received in the chess world. Overall, the opinions are very positive. John Watson gave it a very positive review , and Jacob Aagaard has listed it among the top 10 books of the 20th century . It is also mentioned in another list of 'best' books ....

Understanding middlegames

Have you ever found yourself unable to find a move in the middlegame? Of course you have. We all have. About ten years ago, this was a recurring problem for me, which led to a lot of frustration. My conclusion was that I needed to learn how understand middlegames. So what better way than to read a book with the title Understanding Chess Middlegames ? Sound like the perfect remedy, right? Ok, let's find out. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from this book? I first read this book when I was just starting to study chess seriously. I bought it after reading a recommendation in an online forum. I would say this was ten years ago, but the book came out 2011, so it couldn't have been before that. Anyhow, my playing strength was probably around 1200 (I was unrated at the time) and I was having trouble choosing moves in non-tactical positions. Basically, I was playing without ...

Estimating playing strength

Have you ever felt like your chess rating doesn't represent your actual playing strength? Sometimes we want to be able to estimate playing strength based on individual games rather than rating (which changes more slowly). During the past few months, I've been taking a number of online courses and learning python for data analysis. In one of the courses, the final project allowed me to choose my own dataset. So surprise surprise! I chose something chess related. (Not really surprised, are you?) When we play games online, getting a computer evaluation is just a few clicks away. And a commonly used statistic is the average centipawn loss, or simply the average deviation from the computer's best move. Many of us tend to think that centipawn loss (CPL) is a good estimate of playing strength. And, of course, it gives some indication, but it's far from a perfect predictor. Fellow chess/statistics blogger Patrick Coulombe has investigated the correlation between rating and CPL ...

Questions of modern chess theory

A Soviet classic - that's what it says on the front cover. And for good reason, I think. At the beginning of this year, I decided I would invest some time studying strategy books. I already had a number of them in my collection, and then I stumbled upon a thread in the facebook group ”chess book collectors”. The post contained some controversial claims about the book Question of modern chess theory , which was unfamiliar to me at the time. The post and the ensuing discussions piqued my interest, and I decided to check it out. After some research, I realized that this was a stepping stone for many other books, so I put it at the top of my reading list. I read it during the summer, but haven't got around to writing a review before now. So I actually had to read it again. Anywho, I am finally ready to share my thoughts with the world. Hope you enjoy it. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! Wha...

Patzer's review

Search This Blog