Skip to main content

About Patzer's Review

I am a patzer! Say it with me. It's liberating. You can be a patzer too.
I am a husband and a father of two. I have been playing chess most of my life, but did not join a chess club until my mid 30s. I work full time, and still have the ambition to improve my game. Some may say it's an impossible equation, but I am not the kind to give up easily.

Why do I review chess books?

I started this blog for two reasons. First of all, I have a lot of chess books. I have read many of them, but not all. I want to read them and document my thoughts about the books. I also want to share my impressions of them with others like me; the patzers of the world. Many of the books and book reviews out there are written for masters, but the majority of players are at an intermediate level. So there's a need for more perspectives on chess books. 

About my reviews

All opinions on this blog are my own. I am not affiliated with authors or publishers in any way, and I do not write reviews for anyone else. Also, I do not claim to represent the opinions of a larger group or that my reviews are "objectively correct". My reviews are simply accounts of my experiences in interacting with the books I've read. If you have a different opinion on any of the books that I've reviewed, please leave a comment below the post, or get in touch with me.

In my book reviews, I try to give an estimate of the playing strength that readers should have to benefit the most from the books. These estimates are always given based on FIDE classical rating (OTB). So if you only have an online rating, please look up how to estimate your approximate OTB strength. I also give each review a tag for the estimated level. Here are some approximate rating intervals for the different categories:

BeginnerUp to 1500
Intermediate:1500-2000
Advanced:2000 or higher

The attentive reader may have found that I do not review opening books. This is no coincidence. First of all, they are all rather similar. Furthermore, I do not feel that I do not have the competence to distinguish the good opening books from the bad. But most importantly, I am not very interested in opening books.

About my recommendations

The groups I review are sorted in two main categories; (1) the ones I highly recommend and (2) all the rest. The highly recommended books receive my "stamp of approval", which is both a badge that I add to the cover image as well as a tag for the posts/reviews. The remaining books range from decent to awful (my subjective opinion), which is a very wide category. So why not apply some kind of rating system for these? Simply put, life is too short to read mediocre chess books. I suggest that you read the great ones and leave the others to the collectors.


So let's learn from each other and share tips and ideas about how patzers like us can improve our chess. This is me doing my part.

This blog is for patzers, by a patzer. Masters are welcome too, but may find my rantings all too trivial.  

If you want to get in touch, please find me on Twitter, @DrLangstrand.


Become a Patron!

Comments

  1. UnknownApril 29, 2019 at 11:24 AM

    Well, being a weak 72 years old chessplayer, father of four, owner of around a hundred chess books, I think we are at the same wavelength! So I'll read all your comments, of course!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular reviews

Understanding middlegames

Have you ever found yourself unable to find a move in the middlegame? Of course you have. We all have. About ten years ago, this was a recurring problem for me, which led to a lot of frustration. My conclusion was that I needed to learn how understand middlegames. So what better way than to read a book with the title Understanding Chess Middlegames ? Sound like the perfect remedy, right? Ok, let's find out. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron!   What can you expect from this book? I first read this book when I was just starting to study chess seriously. I bought it after reading a recommendation in an online forum. I would say this was ten years ago, but the book came out 2011, so it couldn't have been before that. Anyhow, my playing strength was probably around 1200 (I was unrated at the time) and I was having trouble choosing moves in non-tactical positions. Basically, I was playing without ...
1 comment
Read more

Estimating playing strength

Have you ever felt like your chess rating doesn't represent your actual playing strength? Sometimes we want to be able to estimate playing strength based on individual games rather than rating (which changes more slowly). During the past few months, I've been taking a number of online courses and learning python for data analysis. In one of the courses, the final project allowed me to choose my own dataset. So surprise surprise! I chose something chess related. (Not really surprised, are you?) When we play games online, getting a computer evaluation is just a few clicks away. And a commonly used statistic is the average centipawn loss, or simply the average deviation from the computer's best move. Many of us tend to think that centipawn loss (CPL) is a good estimate of playing strength. And, of course, it gives some indication, but it's far from a perfect predictor. Fellow chess/statistics blogger Patrick Coulombe has investigated the correlation between rating and CPL ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Questions of modern chess theory

A Soviet classic - that's what it says on the front cover. And for good reason, I think. At the beginning of this year, I decided I would invest some time studying strategy books. I already had a number of them in my collection, and then I stumbled upon a thread in the facebook group ”chess book collectors”. The post contained some controversial claims about the book Question of modern chess theory , which was unfamiliar to me at the time. The post and the ensuing discussions piqued my interest, and I decided to check it out. After some research, I realized that this was a stepping stone for many other books, so I put it at the top of my reading list. I read it during the summer, but haven't got around to writing a review before now. So I actually had to read it again. Anywho, I am finally ready to share my thoughts with the world. Hope you enjoy it. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! Wha...
Post a Comment
Read more

Blindfold chess

Are you impressed by people who can play chess without seeing the board? For the uninitiated, this is a very impressive display of skill. But it is a skill that can be learned, and you don’t need to be a grandmaster to achieve it. The trick is to start small, with few pieces on the board - or in a diagram. In this review, I will discuss a book that can help you on the way to becoming a blindfold chess wiz.   If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from this book? A few years ago, my chess club arranged a small chess display in a local shopping centre. One of the things we did was having someone playing blindfolded against one of the spectators. People around the table were completely blown away by this, and many even asked if it was a trick. (It’s not!) Although blindfold chess seems amazing, even impossible, to some people, it is a skill that is very attainable. I would even c...
Post a Comment
Read more

Lessons with a Grandmaster

If you had actual lessons with a grandmaster, would you be brave enough to publish the transcripts? Well, someone did. And that someone wrote about it in book form — three books, to be precise. In this review, I present my thoughts on the first book in the book series Lessons with a Grandmaster . If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron!   What can you expect from this book? Lessons with a GM  is written in collaboration between Boris Gulko and Joel Sneed. Gulko is a grandmaster who emigrated from the Soviet Union in the 1980s. According to Wikipedia, he is the only player to win the Soviet as well as US Chess championships. Sneed is a professor of psychology at Queens College in New York as well as an amateur player.  In essence, this book is a game collection. There are 25 games in the book, all played by Gulko. There are some real heavyweights among his opponents, such as Kasparov, Karpov,...
Post a Comment
Read more