Skip to main content

The best book for patzers?

I have been playing chess since I was a kid, but until about 10 years ago (2009), I had not even considered reading chess books.
For some reason, this changed. I cannot remember why, but I decided I wanted to learn more about chess and probably pick up a book or two. I searched the Internet and consulted a few online chess forums, and was recommended the book The Amateur's Mind by Jeremy Silman. I bought the book, and that was the start of my growing collection of chess books.

The Amateur's Mind has had a tremendous impact on my understanding of the game. Prior to Reading this book, I had no idea about how to evaluate a position or how to play the opening properly (or any other phase of the game, for that matter). I saw my results improving dramatically, and gained a couple of hundred rating points in just a few months. At this point, I only played online, so I did not have a "proper" rating. But regardless, I learned a lot from reading the book.

What can you expect from this book?

In The Amateur's Mind, Silman provides the basic building blocks of positional evaluation, using his system of imbalances, which are differences in the positional elements for the two players. Examples of imbalances are initiative, development, material and pawn structure. The book will teach you how to identify these imbalances and use them to "take the position apart" and derive a proper plan for how to proceed in the game.

The book is based on a large number of games where Silman has played with his students and asked them to explain their thought process out loud. The transcripts are used as a foundation for Silman to explain the difference between how an amateur thinks about chess and how Silman thinks one should think about chess (hence the title of the book). This is very informative, especially since any amateur will recognize various misconceptions from his or her own games.

I enjoyed this book for several reasons. It is well written, full of good advice for how to make chess a bit easier. Silman has a particular sense of humor that comes through in the text. I enjoyed this, but it may not be for everyone. At the end of the book, there are 25 tests for the readers to try their newly acquired knowledge. At the end of the book, there are "solutions" to the tests, which are quite detailed analyses of each test position. These are concluded by listing a number of tips of how to handle similar positions.

Being the first chess book I read, it made a great impression on me. I was completely ignorant as far as chess theory goes, so every bit of information in the book was gold to me. Looking back a few years later, I still find the book useful.

Who should read this book?

If you are fairly new to chess, or have had little or no formal chess training, this is an excellent introduction. Perhaps you are a post-beginner with holes in your positional understanding. In terms of playing strength, I would expect your rating is below 1600 FIDE. But the book can also be relevant for more advanced players.

If you find this Review useful, please let me know in the comment section.

About this book

Author:Jeremy Silman
Title:The Amateur's Mind
Type of book:Middlegame
Level:Beginner/Intermediate
Labels:

Comments

  1. UnknownApril 22, 2019 at 11:00 PM

    This, Reassess your chess, and Silman's Endgame Course belong in the collection of everyone under 2000.

    ReplyDelete
  2. evaDApril 23, 2019 at 2:51 PM

    As an aspiring adult improver, chess book collector, and sometime chess coach. I appreciate your effort here. Thank you.

    ReplyDelete
  3. UnknownNovember 20, 2019 at 8:36 PM

    Your review made me put this book in my "wish list". I am a post-beginner, indeed a patzer with many holes in positional understanding. Thank you very much.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular reviews

Understanding middlegames

Have you ever found yourself unable to find a move in the middlegame? Of course you have. We all have. About ten years ago, this was a recurring problem for me, which led to a lot of frustration. My conclusion was that I needed to learn how understand middlegames. So what better way than to read a book with the title Understanding Chess Middlegames ? Sound like the perfect remedy, right? Ok, let's find out. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron!   What can you expect from this book? I first read this book when I was just starting to study chess seriously. I bought it after reading a recommendation in an online forum. I would say this was ten years ago, but the book came out 2011, so it couldn't have been before that. Anyhow, my playing strength was probably around 1200 (I was unrated at the time) and I was having trouble choosing moves in non-tactical positions. Basically, I was playing without ...
1 comment
Read more

Estimating playing strength

Have you ever felt like your chess rating doesn't represent your actual playing strength? Sometimes we want to be able to estimate playing strength based on individual games rather than rating (which changes more slowly). During the past few months, I've been taking a number of online courses and learning python for data analysis. In one of the courses, the final project allowed me to choose my own dataset. So surprise surprise! I chose something chess related. (Not really surprised, are you?) When we play games online, getting a computer evaluation is just a few clicks away. And a commonly used statistic is the average centipawn loss, or simply the average deviation from the computer's best move. Many of us tend to think that centipawn loss (CPL) is a good estimate of playing strength. And, of course, it gives some indication, but it's far from a perfect predictor. Fellow chess/statistics blogger Patrick Coulombe has investigated the correlation between rating and CPL ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Chaos on the board

Have you ever felt tired of chess? Maybe you’ve been uninspired or perhaps you think it’s too much work. To paraphrase a famous movie: All work and no play makes you a dull person. If that is the case, I may have a cure. You need a fun chess book. Something that will rekindle your joy for the game and inspire you to play creatively. I give you Tiger’s Chaos Theory ! This book found me at a time when I needed it the most. My inspiration and motivation to study chess was way down. And like a bolt from the blue, the Swedish Chess Federation approached me and wanted me to review this book. And the kind people at Quality Chess agreed to send me a review copy. An offer I couldn't refuse. So after this happy turn of events, I have a new review for you. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from this book? Grandmaster Tiger Hillarp Persson, a multi-time Swedish chess champion, has al...
Post a Comment
Read more

Under the surface

I did something different. I bought a chess book without doing any research. I decided to reward myself with a new book after having written ten reviews. So I asked my friends on Twitter for suggestions, and someone suggested that I take a look at the book Under the surface by Jan Markos. Since the book is quite new, I couldn't find much information about it, so I decided to blindly trust the recommendation. Luckily, I was not let down. What can you expect from this book? I am not the only one who has done something different. Jan Markos did the same when he wrote Under the surface . He takes a quite philosophical approach to chess, which should probably be expected from a former student of philosophy. This comes across quite clearly in his choice of chapter titles. The names "Magnetic Skin", "Anatoly Karpov's Billiard Balls" and "On the Breaking Ice" are not the most transparent chapter titles in the world. But once you get under the surfa...
Post a Comment
Read more

My system should be your system?

One of the greates classics of chess literature. That's at least what it says on the cover. But let's not judge a book by the cover. Instead, we could listen to what others have said about this book. In his review of My system , John Watson writes: "We no longer consider many classics to be essential to a chess education, not since the Internet; but if there’s an exception, Nimzowitch’s work is it". These are big words from a big man. Watson is an authority of chess theory, so his evaluation should not be taken too lightly. Although My system has frequently been mentioned among the greatest books of all time, and has been recommended by many players , it has also been the subject of controversy. Of course, when the book was first published (almost 100 years ago), many ideas in the book challenged many of the established principles of chess theory at the time, and other authorities dismissed the ideas. But also to this day, many people are unimpressed with the b...
Post a Comment
Read more