Skip to main content

Perpetual chess - the book

The Perpetual Chess podcast has been the chess podcast for several years. Since its launch in 2016, Ben Johnson has made almost 500 episodes in which he has interviewed many of the most notable people in chess. After all of these conversations, he has collected a massive amount of material on the topic of chess improvement. So when he announced that he had gathered the most important lessons from the podcast and put them in writing, I was very excited. Unfortunately, I have had many other things in life that have required my attention, so my review was delayed. But now, it's finally here! Hope you find it useful.

If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details.
Become a Patron!

What can you expect from this book?
Perpetual Chess Improvement is essentially a distillation of hundreds of conversations from Perpetual Chess Podcast into a single, highly digestible volume. Rather than presenting a rigid training system, Ben Johnson curates and synthesizes advice from grandmasters, coaches, and dedicated amateurs, searching for common patterns in how players actually improve.

The structure reflects this ambition. The book moves from broad principles – like the “four pillars” of improvement – into more concrete areas such as openings, tactics, and endgames, before shifting again toward meta-questions: plateaus, training habits, and how to organize your study time.

What stands out is how readable it is. This is not a calculation-heavy manual or a dense theoretical work. The number of diagrams is limited, and the emphasis is instead on thought processes, training methods, and practical decision-making. The result feels closer to a well-structured FAQ on chess improvement than a traditional chess book.

That approach is both the book’s greatest strength and its main limitation. On the one hand, you get exposure to a wide range of perspectives—sometimes even contradictory ones—which mirrors the reality that there is no single path to improvement. On the other hand, if you are looking for a tightly argued system or a step-by-step training plan, you may find it a bit scattered.

Still, there is something valuable in the accumulation of advice. Reading it feels like being given access to a large mental library of ideas: how strong players think about study, how they deal with stagnation, and how they structure their chess lives. It is less about giving you answers, and more about helping you ask better questions.

The book has received positive reviews from Nick plays chess, Forward Chess and Andras Toth. Jesse Kraai reviews the book and also gives a short history of the podcast.

Who should read this book?

This book is written for adult improvers – players who are already serious about getting better and are trying to figure out how to do it efficiently. If you are roughly in the intermediate range and above, you will likely recognize many of the problems discussed, e.g. inconsistent study habits, unclear priorities, and the feeling of being stuck despite effort.

Beginners might struggle to extract value, not because the content is overly complex, but because it assumes you already have some experience with studying chess and reflecting on your own progress. More advanced players may not find much that is entirely new, but they may still appreciate the synthesis and occasional fresh perspective.

If you enjoy podcasts, especially long-form discussions about improvement, this book will feel familiar – in a good way. If, however, you prefer concrete exercises, structured repertoires, or deeply analytical material, this is probably not what you are looking for.

About this book

Author:Ben Johnson
Title:Perpetual Chess Improvement
Type of book:Chess improvement, Miscellaneous
Level:Any

Comments

Popular reviews

Judgement and planning

Some books "fly under the radar" and do not get the same attention as the evergreen classics. But sometimes, there is gold in old mines. And I found a little golden nugget while shopping for used books. A book written for amateurs, by (arguably) the best amateur of all time; former world champion Max Euwe. Sounds promising, right? If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from this book? In my previous review of Chess Fundamentals , said that few world champions have written books for beginners and intermediate players. Capablanca is, of course, one exception. And another is Max Euwe. Euwe is not the most well-known world champion. He was in his prime in the 1930s and 1940s, most notably in 1935 when he dethroned none other than the great Alexander Alekhine. Although many have suggested that Alekhine only lost because of heavy use of alcohol, beating him is no small feat (rega...

Nunn’s secrets

Let me tell you a secret. There is no such thing as 'the best chess books'. It all depends on the preferences and expectations of the reader and of course the work s/he puts in when working with the book. So just because someone else claims that a certain book belongs in the 'best books of all time' category, it does not necessarily mean that it is a book that you will appreciate. This little intro may have given away the content of this review, but that's ok. Secrets of practical chess is an example of a book that has gotten a lot of praise on a more than one occasion. So let's dig in and see what the fuss is all about. What can you expect from this book? Secrets of practical chess has seemingly been well received in the chess world. Overall, the opinions are very positive. John Watson gave it a very positive review , and Jacob Aagaard has listed it among the top 10 books of the 20th century . It is also mentioned in another list of 'best' books ....

Understanding middlegames

Have you ever found yourself unable to find a move in the middlegame? Of course you have. We all have. About ten years ago, this was a recurring problem for me, which led to a lot of frustration. My conclusion was that I needed to learn how understand middlegames. So what better way than to read a book with the title Understanding Chess Middlegames ? Sound like the perfect remedy, right? Ok, let's find out. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron!   What can you expect from this book? I first read this book when I was just starting to study chess seriously. I bought it after reading a recommendation in an online forum. I would say this was ten years ago, but the book came out 2011, so it couldn't have been before that. Anyhow, my playing strength was probably around 1200 (I was unrated at the time) and I was having trouble choosing moves in non-tactical positions. Basically, I was playing without ...

Estimating playing strength

Have you ever felt like your chess rating doesn't represent your actual playing strength? Sometimes we want to be able to estimate playing strength based on individual games rather than rating (which changes more slowly). During the past few months, I've been taking a number of online courses and learning python for data analysis. In one of the courses, the final project allowed me to choose my own dataset. So surprise surprise! I chose something chess related. (Not really surprised, are you?) When we play games online, getting a computer evaluation is just a few clicks away. And a commonly used statistic is the average centipawn loss, or simply the average deviation from the computer's best move. Many of us tend to think that centipawn loss (CPL) is a good estimate of playing strength. And, of course, it gives some indication, but it's far from a perfect predictor. Fellow chess/statistics blogger Patrick Coulombe has investigated the correlation between rating and CPL ...

Questions of modern chess theory

A Soviet classic - that's what it says on the front cover. And for good reason, I think. At the beginning of this year, I decided I would invest some time studying strategy books. I already had a number of them in my collection, and then I stumbled upon a thread in the facebook group ”chess book collectors”. The post contained some controversial claims about the book Question of modern chess theory , which was unfamiliar to me at the time. The post and the ensuing discussions piqued my interest, and I decided to check it out. After some research, I realized that this was a stepping stone for many other books, so I put it at the top of my reading list. I read it during the summer, but haven't got around to writing a review before now. So I actually had to read it again. Anywho, I am finally ready to share my thoughts with the world. Hope you enjoy it. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! Wha...