Skip to main content

What it takes

Let me be honest; I fell for the title.
It sort of promises to take your game to the next level, doesn't it? Also, I have read a few books by Andrew Soltis, and I think he is a great writer. That combination is hard to resist.

I first heard about another book by Soltis that has a very similar title: What it takes to become a grandmaster. Someone had given it a good review, so I was curious. I looked it up and found this one as well. I bought both of them.

I spent about a week reading the book, and I have enjoyed it more and more. It is very instructive and well written.

What can you expect from this book?

This book will not make you a chess master. If you think so, you'll probably be disappointed. What it will do, is point to certain factors that characterize players at the master level and thereby indicate what you need to work on.

The book presents nine such factors that make up chapters in the book. Examples of such factors are "winnability" and understanding compensation. Each chapter begins with a brief explanation of the factor at hand, and gives a few examples of their application in actual games. The examples are given in the form of positions where the players have difficult decisions to make. The positions are usually evaluated at a superficial level, followed by a deeper analysis. Finally, the actual moves are provided along with comments and variations.

The moves are annotated in a clear and no-nonsense manner, and variations are provided where necessary. Comments such as "it is easy to see that..." or "obviously, the best move is..." are nowhere to be found in this book, indicating that Soltis has written this book specifically for intermediate players.

All chapters conclude with a handful of exercises. In total, the book has 52 exercises. The solutions provided at the end of the book have short annotations in addition to the moves.

Who should read this book?

This is not a book for beginners. In order to get the most out of this book, you should have a strong tactical foundation and a fair grasp of the fundamentals of positional play. Perhaps you have reached a plateau and are wondering why you can't seem to make that next improvement step. Or perhaps you are wondering what separates you from the strongest players in your club. In terms of playing strength, your rating is probably between 1500 and 2000 FIDE. If this sounds familiar, then this might be a book for you.

About this book

Author:Andrew Soltis
Title:What it takes to become a Chess Master
Type of book:Middlegame
Level:Intermediate

Comments

  1. I am enjoying ur reviews can you do 1 for my favourite book # invisible chess moves by yochanan

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular reviews

Under the surface

I did something different. I bought a chess book without doing any research. I decided to reward myself with a new book after having written ten reviews. So I asked my friends on Twitter for suggestions, and someone suggested that I take a look at the book Under the surface by Jan Markos. Since the book is quite new, I couldn't find much information about it, so I decided to blindly trust the recommendation. Luckily, I was not let down. What can you expect from this book? I am not the only one who has done something different. Jan Markos did the same when he wrote Under the surface . He takes a quite philosophical approach to chess, which should probably be expected from a former student of philosophy. This comes across quite clearly in his choice of chapter titles. The names "Magnetic Skin", "Anatoly Karpov's Billiard Balls" and "On the Breaking Ice" are not the most transparent chapter titles in the world. But once you get under the surfa...

Estimating playing strength

Have you ever felt like your chess rating doesn't represent your actual playing strength? Sometimes we want to be able to estimate playing strength based on individual games rather than rating (which changes more slowly). During the past few months, I've been taking a number of online courses and learning python for data analysis. In one of the courses, the final project allowed me to choose my own dataset. So surprise surprise! I chose something chess related. (Not really surprised, are you?) When we play games online, getting a computer evaluation is just a few clicks away. And a commonly used statistic is the average centipawn loss, or simply the average deviation from the computer's best move. Many of us tend to think that centipawn loss (CPL) is a good estimate of playing strength. And, of course, it gives some indication, but it's far from a perfect predictor. Fellow chess/statistics blogger Patrick Coulombe has investigated the correlation between rating and CPL ...

Master of strategy

During the past two years, I’ve been working on improving my strategic/positional play. In this process, I have read a number of books, and two books that have long been on my reading list are the strategy books by Johan Hellsten. So when the Swedish chess federation requested reviewers for two of these books, I didn’t hesitate. I am happy that I was given the opportunity to review these books, and hope this review can be of help to you as a reader. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from these books? Johan Hellsten has created a name for himself as one of the leading experts of chess strategy in modern times. His series of strategy books ( Mastering Opening Strategy , Mastering Chess Strategy and Mastering Endgame Strategy ) have received glowing reviews from many parts of the chess world. So it feels good to finally dig into these nuggets. His endgame book is still in my boo...

Stop and reassess!

In my very first post on this blog, I reviewed The Amateur's Mind by Jeremy Silman. That was my first step to understand chess strategy. And I actually bought another one of Silman's book at the same time, but for some reason, it took me more than ten years to read. I finally decided to go through it and now I am ready to share my thoughts with you. (It feels like I've written this before.) If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from this book? Before writing this review, I had a few candidates. I am always reading several books in parallel, and I have a number that I'm about to finish. So I asked the Twitter community for input on which book they would like me to review as number 50. And this came out on top. So far I have reviewed 49 books on #patzersreview . Which one should be number 50? My candidates are: - Silman: Reassess your chess workbook - Nunn: Solving in...

Not only for kids

Do you read children's books? If you're and adult, you will probably steer clear of any book that has the phrase "for kids" in it. Since it's for kids, and you're not a kid. Right? Well there are some exceptions, and this is one of them. Author Jeff Coakley has written a number of books "for kids": Winning chess strategy for kids , Winning chess exercises for kids and Winning chess puzzles for kids (vol 1 and 2). Although the titles suggest otherwise, these books are highly instructive and useful for players of all ages. In this review, I have chosen to focus on the first book in his series, Winning chess strategy for kids . What can you expect from this book? Immediately when seeing this book, you will realize that there is one major feature that is "for kids", and that is the artwork. Apart from that, there is no reason to assume that this book cannot be used for adult improvers. I used this book as a part of my tactics training p...