Skip to main content

Rapid chess improvement

Would you like to gain 400 rating points in 400 days? That is what Michael de la Maza did. And he wrote a book about his progress and the methods that got him there. Quite an appealing idea, and many players at the beginner and intermediate level will be enticed. I was. Are you?

In 2001, Michael de la Maza wrote an article in Chess horizons called "400 points in 400 days". In the article, he outlines the main components of his training program and gives a short account of his own progress. He managed to to get from about 1300 to 2000 in just two years, which is quite an accomplishment. His ideas were later elaborated upon and presented in the book Rapid chess improvement.

This book was published quite a few years ago, and can be difficult to find. But it has been republished in a new form, together with two other books in A chess course: from beginner to winner. If you decide you want to buy Rapid chess improvement, this three-in-one volume may be a good option.

What can you expect from this book?

Let me be up front with this: This book will probably not make you gain 400 rating in a year. Although de la Maza did, I think there might be other factors involved than the ones he describes in the book. Also, I think that his methods are not necessarily universally valid.

This being said, Rapid chess improvement will give you some interesting ideas for training your visualization skills, your tactical ability and your thinking process. Each of these three topics are given separate chapters in the book. The tactics part is what has given the book the most attention, and in my opinion the biggest takeaway from reading it.

Michael de la Maza suggests a quite rigorous training program when it comes to tactics. According to his method, you should first identify a large number of fundamental tactical patterns, about 1000 puzzles. Secondly, you work through all of the puzzles systematically, at a slow pace. In the book, the recommended time is 64 days for all puzzles. Then work through them again, and again, and again, and again, and again, and once more. For each iteration, you cut the time in half. This method is referred to as "the seven circles" in the book. Some of you may recognize this as the "woodpecker method" described by Axel Smith in his book Pump up your rating and in the recent book The woodpecker method, written together with Hans Tikkanen. Dan Heisman suggests a similar approach in his Novice Nook article "A different approach to studying tactics", which can also be found in his book A guide to chess improvement (my review here).

It is generally accepted that there are no shortcuts or quick fixes when it comes to chess improvement. But using this method is probably as close as you can get. My Twitter friend Neal Bruce has used a similar approach in his tactics training, and has found it to be very helpful. I have also tried it myself, but not quite with the amount of discipline that Neal or de la Maza have had. Still, it has improved my pattern recognition and my tactical abilities. I have written a couple of posts about this on my previous blog.

Who should read this book?

This book is mainly for players at the beginner to intermediate level. It may help some readers to find a more structured approach to their chess studies. Personally, I found it interesting and somewhat inspiring, but it is not among my favorite books. The message and the content is basically the same as in the original article, and in my opinion, there is simply not enough content to fill an entire book (albeit a rather thin one). If you happen to stumble upon the book, I recommend that you read it. But I wouldn't go out of my way to get hold of it.

About this book

Author:Michael de la Maza
Title:Rapid chess improvement
Type of book:Chess improvement
Level:Beginner/Intermediate

Comments

  1. "The message and the content is basically the same as in the original article, and in my opinion, there is simply not enough content to fill an entire book (albeit a rather thin one)."

    That is the consensus view. Best just to read the article (which is available online for free). It's also worth noting that de la Maza quit chess after hitting 2000 USCF.

    ReplyDelete
  2. First of, I think you have a really cool site over here. I often find myself (and I guess many others as well) in the same place as you, as an adult chess enthousiast. But somehow learning new things doesn't come as natural anymore as it once did. I think many can relate to that, so keep up the good work here!

    I have a question about your blog on chess.com. There you state that you create pgn files from chess books with lucas chess. Could you please explain how to do that? I still do this manually, which takes an awful lot of time. Thanks in advance.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for your kind words. It’s always nice to get positive feedback.

      My method was to scan the books to pdf and then scan with Lucas Chess. Now you can do this easier with apps such as Chessify or Chessvision.ai.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular reviews

Under the surface

I did something different. I bought a chess book without doing any research. I decided to reward myself with a new book after having written ten reviews. So I asked my friends on Twitter for suggestions, and someone suggested that I take a look at the book Under the surface by Jan Markos. Since the book is quite new, I couldn't find much information about it, so I decided to blindly trust the recommendation. Luckily, I was not let down. What can you expect from this book? I am not the only one who has done something different. Jan Markos did the same when he wrote Under the surface . He takes a quite philosophical approach to chess, which should probably be expected from a former student of philosophy. This comes across quite clearly in his choice of chapter titles. The names "Magnetic Skin", "Anatoly Karpov's Billiard Balls" and "On the Breaking Ice" are not the most transparent chapter titles in the world. But once you get under the surfa...

Learn chess tactics

Where should you turn for tactics training? This is a frequently occuring question, not only from beginners, but also from intermediate players. Which books are suitable for your specific level, and which ones should you get? In this review, I take on a book that I suggest you do get - at least if you're at or near the beginning of your chess development. This was actually my first tactics book back in the day, and I recently reread it in order to give a proper review. I remember that I liked it the first time around and that my tactical skills improved. Although rereading it didn't contribute all that much to my learning, I still have a good impression of it. Please read on for more details. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from this book? Learn Chess Tactics is written by the one and only John Nunn, and (as the name implies) it is a tactics book. I would go as f...

Master of strategy

During the past two years, I’ve been working on improving my strategic/positional play. In this process, I have read a number of books, and two books that have long been on my reading list are the strategy books by Johan Hellsten. So when the Swedish chess federation requested reviewers for two of these books, I didn’t hesitate. I am happy that I was given the opportunity to review these books, and hope this review can be of help to you as a reader. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from these books? Johan Hellsten has created a name for himself as one of the leading experts of chess strategy in modern times. His series of strategy books ( Mastering Opening Strategy , Mastering Chess Strategy and Mastering Endgame Strategy ) have received glowing reviews from many parts of the chess world. So it feels good to finally dig into these nuggets. His endgame book is still in my boo...

The best book for patzers?

I have been playing chess since I was a kid, but until about 10 years ago (2009), I had not even considered reading chess books. For some reason, this changed. I cannot remember why, but I decided I wanted to learn more about chess and probably pick up a book or two. I searched the Internet and consulted a few online chess forums, and was recommended the book The Amateur's Mind by Jeremy Silman. I bought the book, and that was the start of my growing collection of chess books. The Amateur's Mind has had a tremendous impact on my understanding of the game. Prior to Reading this book, I had no idea about how to evaluate a position or how to play the opening properly (or any other phase of the game, for that matter). I saw my results improving dramatically, and gained a couple of hundred rating points in just a few months. At this point, I only played online, so I did not have a "proper" rating. But regardless, I learned a lot from reading the book. What can y...

Think first or think later? - part 1

This is a different kind of review. It's not just a review of one book, but two (actually three). Therefore, it's written in two parts, and this is part 1. I have chosen the book Move first, think later by Willy Hendriks and Understanding before moving by Herman Grooten (which is actually a series, with two books so far). The main reason I chose these books is that the titles indicate completely opposite views of how to approach chess: Think before you move or just move and think later. So how should a patzer like me make sense of this? I read the book on Forward Chess , which was a new experience for me. The service is available for various operative systems. I used the app on my iPad. One advantage is that it allows you to click through the variations instead of just visualizing them in your head. You can of course skip this, if you want to train your visualization skills. Another good thing is that you can try out various moves that are not in the book and switch on an ...