Skip to main content

What it takes

Let me be honest; I fell for the title.
It sort of promises to take your game to the next level, doesn't it? Also, I have read a few books by Andrew Soltis, and I think he is a great writer. That combination is hard to resist.

I first heard about another book by Soltis that has a very similar title: What it takes to become a grandmaster. Someone had given it a good review, so I was curious. I looked it up and found this one as well. I bought both of them.

I spent about a week reading the book, and I have enjoyed it more and more. It is very instructive and well written.

What can you expect from this book?

This book will not make you a chess master. If you think so, you'll probably be disappointed. What it will do, is point to certain factors that characterize players at the master level and thereby indicate what you need to work on.

The book presents nine such factors that make up chapters in the book. Examples of such factors are "winnability" and understanding compensation. Each chapter begins with a brief explanation of the factor at hand, and gives a few examples of their application in actual games. The examples are given in the form of positions where the players have difficult decisions to make. The positions are usually evaluated at a superficial level, followed by a deeper analysis. Finally, the actual moves are provided along with comments and variations.

The moves are annotated in a clear and no-nonsense manner, and variations are provided where necessary. Comments such as "it is easy to see that..." or "obviously, the best move is..." are nowhere to be found in this book, indicating that Soltis has written this book specifically for intermediate players.

All chapters conclude with a handful of exercises. In total, the book has 52 exercises. The solutions provided at the end of the book have short annotations in addition to the moves.

Who should read this book?

This is not a book for beginners. In order to get the most out of this book, you should have a strong tactical foundation and a fair grasp of the fundamentals of positional play. Perhaps you have reached a plateau and are wondering why you can't seem to make that next improvement step. Or perhaps you are wondering what separates you from the strongest players in your club. In terms of playing strength, your rating is probably between 1500 and 2000 FIDE. If this sounds familiar, then this might be a book for you.

About this book

Author:Andrew Soltis
Title:What it takes to become a Chess Master
Type of book:Middlegame
Level:Intermediate
Labels:

Comments

  1. UnknownApril 22, 2019 at 10:24 AM

    I am enjoying ur reviews can you do 1 for my favourite book # invisible chess moves by yochanan

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular reviews

Judgement and planning

Some books "fly under the radar" and do not get the same attention as the evergreen classics. But sometimes, there is gold in old mines. And I found a little golden nugget while shopping for used books. A book written for amateurs, by (arguably) the best amateur of all time; former world champion Max Euwe. Sounds promising, right? If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from this book? In my previous review of Chess Fundamentals , said that few world champions have written books for beginners and intermediate players. Capablanca is, of course, one exception. And another is Max Euwe. Euwe is not the most well-known world champion. He was in his prime in the 1930s and 1940s, most notably in 1935 when he dethroned none other than the great Alexander Alekhine. Although many have suggested that Alekhine only lost because of heavy use of alcohol, beating him is no small feat (rega...
Post a Comment
Read more

Thoughts on chess improvement

I was recently interviewed by Kevin Scull  for his podcast  Chess Journeys: Tales of Adult Improvement . When I got the request, I started thinking about what I have to contribute with in terms of improvement advice for chess players. I ended up creating a mindmap of it all, and thought I would share it with you along with an elaboration of what it means. Three questions for you In my opinion, there are three main questions that you need to ask yourself in order to find your  path to chess improvement: Why am I doing this? What will I focus on? How will I study? I have tried (and failed) myself, many times. And what I've realized is that you cannot copy other people's plans for improvement; you need to create a personalized plan that is adapted to your goals, your needs and your general life situation. Don't copy other people's improvement plans Start with WHY I've seen a lot of adult players describe their chess goals. Almost all of them are defined in...
2 comments
Read more

Stop and reassess!

In my very first post on this blog, I reviewed The Amateur's Mind by Jeremy Silman. That was my first step to understand chess strategy. And I actually bought another one of Silman's book at the same time, but for some reason, it took me more than ten years to read. I finally decided to go through it and now I am ready to share my thoughts with you. (It feels like I've written this before.) If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from this book? Before writing this review, I had a few candidates. I am always reading several books in parallel, and I have a number that I'm about to finish. So I asked the Twitter community for input on which book they would like me to review as number 50. And this came out on top. So far I have reviewed 49 books on #patzersreview . Which one should be number 50? My candidates are: - Silman: Reassess your chess workbook - Nunn: Solving in...
Post a Comment
Read more

Lessons from a legend

What if you could get chess lessons from a former world champion? Would you say yes? This is a question that Kostya Kavutskiy asked in a recent video . I decided to accept that offer, and during the past few weeks, I've spent some quality time with the third world champion, José Capablanca. In his 100 year old book, he outlines some of the most important principles of chess. If you haven't already read this book, maybe you should? Hopefully, this review will help to decide if this book is for you. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron!   What can you expect from this book? Several world champions (most of them?) have written books for advanced players. Capablanca is one of the few who have written chess books for beginners and intermediate players. And his book Chess Fundamentals  is a classic introductory book. Many people have recommended it, and I've had it on my reading list for a long time...
Post a Comment
Read more

My system should be your system?

One of the greates classics of chess literature. That's at least what it says on the cover. But let's not judge a book by the cover. Instead, we could listen to what others have said about this book. In his review of My system , John Watson writes: "We no longer consider many classics to be essential to a chess education, not since the Internet; but if there’s an exception, Nimzowitch’s work is it". These are big words from a big man. Watson is an authority of chess theory, so his evaluation should not be taken too lightly. Although My system has frequently been mentioned among the greatest books of all time, and has been recommended by many players , it has also been the subject of controversy. Of course, when the book was first published (almost 100 years ago), many ideas in the book challenged many of the established principles of chess theory at the time, and other authorities dismissed the ideas. But also to this day, many people are unimpressed with the b...
Post a Comment
Read more