Skip to main content

Thinking about thinking

How should you think during a chess game? This is a critical question. Chess is a thinking game, and therefore, improving your game means improving your thinking. That should be a fairly uncontroversial statement. So if you want to improve your game through better thinking, a book on the subject should be exactly what you're looking for. I wish I could say that this book is the answer to all your questions, but unfortunately, that is not the case. In this review, I will tell you what I like and what I don't like about The Improving Chess Thinker by Dan Heisman.

If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details.
Become a Patron!

What can you expect from this book?

The Improving Chess Thinker is a book that aspires to teach you how to think about chess. The basic idea of the book is to record players at various levels as they "think out loud" about the position they are analyzing. In the first chapter of the book, six positions are presented to form the foundation of the book. These positions are fed to Heisman's students who are then requested to verbalize their thinking while choosing a move in the given position(s).
Chess is a thinking game, and few beginners are taught how to think to find their move. (p. 9)
First, the transcription of the student's thought process is presented, followed by some brief comments from Heisman. This is repeated throughout the book. For those of you who have read Jeremy Silman's The Amateur's Mind, you will recognize this idea. And the logic and structure is pretty similar in Heisman's book.

The Improving Chess Thinker has two different parts, although they are not explicitly presented as such. The first part (chapters 1-8) present the exercises and protocols for players of various levels, from Class F through A and Expert level. Each chapter is concluded by a summary of common mistakes.

According to Heisman the logic is as follows:
Read the chapter representing your rating class. Then read the chapters one and two classes above your level to see what knowledge, process and logic is applied by superior players to arrive at their move. (p. 14)
The second part of the book (chapter 9-14) contain more traditional instruction material, and covers topics such as thinking process, common mistakes and time management. Those who are familiar with Heisman's writing will recognize this kind of material from other publications, such as A Guide to Chess Improvement or The world's most instructive amateur game book.

When I first stumbled upon this book, I was very excited. I had identified a bad thinking process as one of my many weaknesses, and was thinking (no pun intended) that this book would help me correct that problem. I spent some time analyzing the training positions in the book and even recorded my thought process so that I could compare myself to what's presented in the book. But as I dug more and more into the book, my disappointment increased. Let me tell you why. 

The book contains 84 protocols from students and an additional one from former world champion Max Euwe. As I read the book, I got the feeling that an overwhelming majority of the protocols are dedicated to a single position. The same position and the same thinking mistakes were repeated over and over again. As you can see from the table below, the number of protocols is very unevenly distributed across the positions. One position represents 70 % of all the protocols. And one position actually gets no love at all in the book.

PositionNumber of protocols
A59
Z12
E9
C2
S2
B0

This fundamental lack of balance is a big weakness of the book. I can understand that as a coach, Heisman has a preference for a certain position and uses it frequently in his lessons. And perhaps this position is particularly instructive and useful for this kind of exercise. I am not competent to assess that. However, as a reader, I would like to see a variety of examples, and not only the same position rehashed over and over. And for the life of me, I cannot understand why Heisman has included a position that is not even used in the book. This has to be a serious oversight from the author and the editor. The fact that this is the second edition of the book makes it even more puzzling.

Another weakness of the book is the structure. In my opinion, the idea of reading the chapter corresponding to your level represents a broken logic. Sure, if I see common mistakes made at my level, I can become more attentive towards those mistakes. But if I want to improve, I want to see examples of how it can be done correctly. And sure, players one or two classes above me will not make the same mistakes as often, but they'l make other mistakes that I want to avoid.

After reading the book, I made a short summary of how I think the book should have been structured. First of all, I would have structured the book by position. I would have a chapter for each position with examples from players of all levels giving their analyses. This should be followed by a summary of common mistakes and what differentiates the various levels - and, of course, a correct analysis of the position along with the best move(s). 

In my opinion, this would correct two problems this book has. First of all, it would ensure that all positions are given approximately the same amount of attention/commentary. Secondly, it would make use of the differences in mistakes made by players of different strength, and make it clearer what is required to advance to the next level. And thirdly, it would make the book more fun to read.

Incidentally, there seems to be a book that seems to do exacly this. Mickey Adams and Philip Hurtado have recently published the book Think like a Super-GM. Adams has published a blog post about the book, if you want to learn more. I know I will definitely take a look at it.

As you have probably realized by now, I really like the idea behind The Improving Chess Thinker. And I think the book has a lot of good material. But I have major objections concerning the structure and presentation. The book feels more like an initial draft than a finished book. So although I would have liked to, I cannot recommend this book for chess improvement. However, if you have an academic interest in chess analysis, this might be an interesting read.

Who should read this book?

This book is written with a wide range of players in mind. Although it is presented as a sort of manual for how to think in chess, I think it will be most interesting for coaches and readers with an academic interest in how chess players think. If your aim is to improve your own chess, I cannot really recommend it. 

About this book

Author:Dan Heisman
Title:The Improving Chess Thinker
Type of book:Chess improvement
Level:Beginner, Intermediate
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular reviews

Chaos on the board

Have you ever felt tired of chess? Maybe you’ve been uninspired or perhaps you think it’s too much work. To paraphrase a famous movie: All work and no play makes you a dull person. If that is the case, I may have a cure. You need a fun chess book. Something that will rekindle your joy for the game and inspire you to play creatively. I give you Tiger’s Chaos Theory ! This book found me at a time when I needed it the most. My inspiration and motivation to study chess was way down. And like a bolt from the blue, the Swedish Chess Federation approached me and wanted me to review this book. And the kind people at Quality Chess agreed to send me a review copy. An offer I couldn't refuse. So after this happy turn of events, I have a new review for you. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from this book? Grandmaster Tiger Hillarp Persson, a multi-time Swedish chess champion, has al...
Post a Comment
Read more

Winning chess strategies

Chess strategy is one of the most elusive and difficult parts of chess. Compared to the direct and transparent world of chess tactics, strategy can be confusing and opaque. At the patzer level, tactical strikes that gain material or lead to checkmate can be obvious (provided that one understands the tactic). However, in many cases, strong players claim that a move is obvious although it doesn't result in material gain or even a semblance of an attack. We, the patzers of the world, scratch our heads and wonder how on earth anyone can find such moves obvious. How can we take steps towards this deeper level of chess understanding? Picking up a basic strategy book is a good first step. And that's what I did here. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from this book? As a part of my ambition to deepen my understanding of chess strategy, I took on a mission of reading (and rev...
Post a Comment
Read more

My system should be your system?

One of the greates classics of chess literature. That's at least what it says on the cover. But let's not judge a book by the cover. Instead, we could listen to what others have said about this book. In his review of My system , John Watson writes: "We no longer consider many classics to be essential to a chess education, not since the Internet; but if there’s an exception, Nimzowitch’s work is it". These are big words from a big man. Watson is an authority of chess theory, so his evaluation should not be taken too lightly. Although My system has frequently been mentioned among the greatest books of all time, and has been recommended by many players , it has also been the subject of controversy. Of course, when the book was first published (almost 100 years ago), many ideas in the book challenged many of the established principles of chess theory at the time, and other authorities dismissed the ideas. But also to this day, many people are unimpressed with the b...
Post a Comment
Read more

Estimating playing strength

Have you ever felt like your chess rating doesn't represent your actual playing strength? Sometimes we want to be able to estimate playing strength based on individual games rather than rating (which changes more slowly). During the past few months, I've been taking a number of online courses and learning python for data analysis. In one of the courses, the final project allowed me to choose my own dataset. So surprise surprise! I chose something chess related. (Not really surprised, are you?) When we play games online, getting a computer evaluation is just a few clicks away. And a commonly used statistic is the average centipawn loss, or simply the average deviation from the computer's best move. Many of us tend to think that centipawn loss (CPL) is a good estimate of playing strength. And, of course, it gives some indication, but it's far from a perfect predictor. Fellow chess/statistics blogger Patrick Coulombe has investigated the correlation between rating and CPL ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Understanding middlegames

Have you ever found yourself unable to find a move in the middlegame? Of course you have. We all have. About ten years ago, this was a recurring problem for me, which led to a lot of frustration. My conclusion was that I needed to learn how understand middlegames. So what better way than to read a book with the title Understanding Chess Middlegames ? Sound like the perfect remedy, right? Ok, let's find out. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron!   What can you expect from this book? I first read this book when I was just starting to study chess seriously. I bought it after reading a recommendation in an online forum. I would say this was ten years ago, but the book came out 2011, so it couldn't have been before that. Anyhow, my playing strength was probably around 1200 (I was unrated at the time) and I was having trouble choosing moves in non-tactical positions. Basically, I was playing without ...
1 comment
Read more