Skip to main content

Amateurs at large

If you can't learn something from a game, you're doing something wrong. These are the words of adult improver extraordinaire Neal Bruce in an interview on Chess Dojo. For most people, learning from games means studying master games. But what about games played by amateurs? This review covers a book that aims to extract important lessons from amateur games.

If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details.
Become a Patron!

What can you expect from this book?

I first came across Dan Heisman's writing through his blog on chess.com. This must have been about 5 years ago. I was impressed by the large number of suggestions that are relevant for amateur players (patzers like us). And when I started to explore his bibliography, there was one book that quickly made it to my wishlist: The World's Most Instructive Amateur Game Book. (a.k.a the chess book with the longest title ever). And after several years, I finally got around to reading it.

The basic principle of the book is that you take a number of games played between amateurs and add some comments and suggestions from an instructor's perspective. Heisman highlights the mistakes that are made and aims to turn each of them into a small lesson that the reader (hopefully) will learn something from.

The book has five chapters with separate themes:
  1. Playing too fast
  2. Playing too slow
  3. Misplaying the endgame
  4. "Variety of instructive play"
  5. Decisive tactical mistakes
As usual, the publisher has put out an excerpt from the book, where you can see the table of contents (with proper chapter titles) along with a sample game.

This is a quite large book. It covers 30 games and has more than 300 pages. This means that each game is given about 10 pages on average, which is quite extensive. There are several reasons for the large number of pages per game.

The annotations obviously account for the majority of the contents, and they contain many different things. Obviously, the moves are presented along with the usual annotation symbols you would expect from any book (?? ! +- etc.) . You also get alternative lines for the substandard moves. Quite ordinary, so far. However, in addition to this, the time stamps from the games are included, which allows you to see how much time is spent for each move. Heisman uses this quite extensively, along with comments on whether or not the time management is reasonable. Spoiler alert: Usually it is not (which is indicated by the names of the two first chapters). Finally, the annotations also include computer evaluations and comments on the computer moves.

It seems that Heisman tries to cover it all in this book; openings, middlegames, endings, tactics, general principles etc. In my opinion, the combination of ordinary annotations along with comments on time management and computer evaluations makes it a bit too much. My impression is that the main message tends to be a bit muffled because of the large amount of information. Also, I feel that Heisman is a bit too heavy on the computer evaluations at times. In several games, he presents the computer's top moves without even attempting an explanation. I am having a hard time seeing the value of this.

This being said, the book has its fair share of upsides. You will find numerous examples of established principles and rules of thumb that can guide your decision making (but only in chess, not IRL). If you've read other publications by Heisman (books and articles), you'll probably recognize a great deal. The principles and recommendations are the same as you will find in his book A guide to chess improvement. What sets the game collection book apart from his other work is that you get a presentation of established principles (e.g. "move your rooks to open files") in a game context, and usually with a clear example of what happens when you don't follow said principles. The principles are often presented in italics or a grey text box, which makes them stick out from the rest of the text and thereby easy to find if you're just flipping through the pages or looking for something you've already read. Heisman also gives reading recommendations in conjunction with the game annotations, which can make it easier to find the books that correspond to your particular needs. For me, this is the main takeaway from the book.

Heisman has put up av youtube video where he goes through one of the games in the book. I think the video gives a fairly good idea about what the book is all about and how the games are presented. So if you like the video, you'll probably enjoy the book as well.

Who should read this book?

This is a book that is mainly geared towards beginners. It can also be useful for some intermediate players, if you want to sure up your foundation. In the video referenced above, Heisman says the book should be useful for players in the range 1100 to 2200. In my opinion, that may be a bit high. I think that most players rated 1800 and above will already be familiar with most of the stuff in the book.

About this book

Author:Dan Heisman
Title:The World's Most Instructive Amateur Game Book
Type of book:Chess improvement, Game collection
Level:Beginner/Intermediate
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular reviews

Chaos on the board

Have you ever felt tired of chess? Maybe you’ve been uninspired or perhaps you think it’s too much work. To paraphrase a famous movie: All work and no play makes you a dull person. If that is the case, I may have a cure. You need a fun chess book. Something that will rekindle your joy for the game and inspire you to play creatively. I give you Tiger’s Chaos Theory ! This book found me at a time when I needed it the most. My inspiration and motivation to study chess was way down. And like a bolt from the blue, the Swedish Chess Federation approached me and wanted me to review this book. And the kind people at Quality Chess agreed to send me a review copy. An offer I couldn't refuse. So after this happy turn of events, I have a new review for you. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from this book? Grandmaster Tiger Hillarp Persson, a multi-time Swedish chess champion, has al...
Post a Comment
Read more

Understanding middlegames

Have you ever found yourself unable to find a move in the middlegame? Of course you have. We all have. About ten years ago, this was a recurring problem for me, which led to a lot of frustration. My conclusion was that I needed to learn how understand middlegames. So what better way than to read a book with the title Understanding Chess Middlegames ? Sound like the perfect remedy, right? Ok, let's find out. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron!   What can you expect from this book? I first read this book when I was just starting to study chess seriously. I bought it after reading a recommendation in an online forum. I would say this was ten years ago, but the book came out 2011, so it couldn't have been before that. Anyhow, my playing strength was probably around 1200 (I was unrated at the time) and I was having trouble choosing moves in non-tactical positions. Basically, I was playing without ...
1 comment
Read more

My system should be your system?

One of the greates classics of chess literature. That's at least what it says on the cover. But let's not judge a book by the cover. Instead, we could listen to what others have said about this book. In his review of My system , John Watson writes: "We no longer consider many classics to be essential to a chess education, not since the Internet; but if there’s an exception, Nimzowitch’s work is it". These are big words from a big man. Watson is an authority of chess theory, so his evaluation should not be taken too lightly. Although My system has frequently been mentioned among the greatest books of all time, and has been recommended by many players , it has also been the subject of controversy. Of course, when the book was first published (almost 100 years ago), many ideas in the book challenged many of the established principles of chess theory at the time, and other authorities dismissed the ideas. But also to this day, many people are unimpressed with the b...
Post a Comment
Read more

Under the surface

I did something different. I bought a chess book without doing any research. I decided to reward myself with a new book after having written ten reviews. So I asked my friends on Twitter for suggestions, and someone suggested that I take a look at the book Under the surface by Jan Markos. Since the book is quite new, I couldn't find much information about it, so I decided to blindly trust the recommendation. Luckily, I was not let down. What can you expect from this book? I am not the only one who has done something different. Jan Markos did the same when he wrote Under the surface . He takes a quite philosophical approach to chess, which should probably be expected from a former student of philosophy. This comes across quite clearly in his choice of chapter titles. The names "Magnetic Skin", "Anatoly Karpov's Billiard Balls" and "On the Breaking Ice" are not the most transparent chapter titles in the world. But once you get under the surfa...
Post a Comment
Read more

Estimating playing strength

Have you ever felt like your chess rating doesn't represent your actual playing strength? Sometimes we want to be able to estimate playing strength based on individual games rather than rating (which changes more slowly). During the past few months, I've been taking a number of online courses and learning python for data analysis. In one of the courses, the final project allowed me to choose my own dataset. So surprise surprise! I chose something chess related. (Not really surprised, are you?) When we play games online, getting a computer evaluation is just a few clicks away. And a commonly used statistic is the average centipawn loss, or simply the average deviation from the computer's best move. Many of us tend to think that centipawn loss (CPL) is a good estimate of playing strength. And, of course, it gives some indication, but it's far from a perfect predictor. Fellow chess/statistics blogger Patrick Coulombe has investigated the correlation between rating and CPL ...
Post a Comment
Read more