Skip to main content

Amateurs at large

If you can't learn something from a game, you're doing something wrong. These are the words of adult improver extraordinaire Neal Bruce in an interview on Chess Dojo. For most people, learning from games means studying master games. But what about games played by amateurs? This review covers a book that aims to extract important lessons from amateur games.

If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details.
Become a Patron!

What can you expect from this book?

I first came across Dan Heisman's writing through his blog on chess.com. This must have been about 5 years ago. I was impressed by the large number of suggestions that are relevant for amateur players (patzers like us). And when I started to explore his bibliography, there was one book that quickly made it to my wishlist: The World's Most Instructive Amateur Game Book. (a.k.a the chess book with the longest title ever). And after several years, I finally got around to reading it.

The basic principle of the book is that you take a number of games played between amateurs and add some comments and suggestions from an instructor's perspective. Heisman highlights the mistakes that are made and aims to turn each of them into a small lesson that the reader (hopefully) will learn something from.

The book has five chapters with separate themes:
  1. Playing too fast
  2. Playing too slow
  3. Misplaying the endgame
  4. "Variety of instructive play"
  5. Decisive tactical mistakes
As usual, the publisher has put out an excerpt from the book, where you can see the table of contents (with proper chapter titles) along with a sample game.

This is a quite large book. It covers 30 games and has more than 300 pages. This means that each game is given about 10 pages on average, which is quite extensive. There are several reasons for the large number of pages per game.

The annotations obviously account for the majority of the contents, and they contain many different things. Obviously, the moves are presented along with the usual annotation symbols you would expect from any book (?? ! +- etc.) . You also get alternative lines for the substandard moves. Quite ordinary, so far. However, in addition to this, the time stamps from the games are included, which allows you to see how much time is spent for each move. Heisman uses this quite extensively, along with comments on whether or not the time management is reasonable. Spoiler alert: Usually it is not (which is indicated by the names of the two first chapters). Finally, the annotations also include computer evaluations and comments on the computer moves.

It seems that Heisman tries to cover it all in this book; openings, middlegames, endings, tactics, general principles etc. In my opinion, the combination of ordinary annotations along with comments on time management and computer evaluations makes it a bit too much. My impression is that the main message tends to be a bit muffled because of the large amount of information. Also, I feel that Heisman is a bit too heavy on the computer evaluations at times. In several games, he presents the computer's top moves without even attempting an explanation. I am having a hard time seeing the value of this.

This being said, the book has its fair share of upsides. You will find numerous examples of established principles and rules of thumb that can guide your decision making (but only in chess, not IRL). If you've read other publications by Heisman (books and articles), you'll probably recognize a great deal. The principles and recommendations are the same as you will find in his book A guide to chess improvement. What sets the game collection book apart from his other work is that you get a presentation of established principles (e.g. "move your rooks to open files") in a game context, and usually with a clear example of what happens when you don't follow said principles. The principles are often presented in italics or a grey text box, which makes them stick out from the rest of the text and thereby easy to find if you're just flipping through the pages or looking for something you've already read. Heisman also gives reading recommendations in conjunction with the game annotations, which can make it easier to find the books that correspond to your particular needs. For me, this is the main takeaway from the book.

Heisman has put up av youtube video where he goes through one of the games in the book. I think the video gives a fairly good idea about what the book is all about and how the games are presented. So if you like the video, you'll probably enjoy the book as well.

Who should read this book?

This is a book that is mainly geared towards beginners. It can also be useful for some intermediate players, if you want to sure up your foundation. In the video referenced above, Heisman says the book should be useful for players in the range 1100 to 2200. In my opinion, that may be a bit high. I think that most players rated 1800 and above will already be familiar with most of the stuff in the book.

About this book

Author:Dan Heisman
Title:The World's Most Instructive Amateur Game Book
Type of book:Chess improvement, Game collection
Level:Beginner/Intermediate
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular reviews

Judgement and planning

Some books "fly under the radar" and do not get the same attention as the evergreen classics. But sometimes, there is gold in old mines. And I found a little golden nugget while shopping for used books. A book written for amateurs, by (arguably) the best amateur of all time; former world champion Max Euwe. Sounds promising, right? If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from this book? In my previous review of Chess Fundamentals , said that few world champions have written books for beginners and intermediate players. Capablanca is, of course, one exception. And another is Max Euwe. Euwe is not the most well-known world champion. He was in his prime in the 1930s and 1940s, most notably in 1935 when he dethroned none other than the great Alexander Alekhine. Although many have suggested that Alekhine only lost because of heavy use of alcohol, beating him is no small feat (rega...
Post a Comment
Read more

Nunn’s secrets

Let me tell you a secret. There is no such thing as 'the best chess books'. It all depends on the preferences and expectations of the reader and of course the work s/he puts in when working with the book. So just because someone else claims that a certain book belongs in the 'best books of all time' category, it does not necessarily mean that it is a book that you will appreciate. This little intro may have given away the content of this review, but that's ok. Secrets of practical chess is an example of a book that has gotten a lot of praise on a more than one occasion. So let's dig in and see what the fuss is all about. What can you expect from this book? Secrets of practical chess has seemingly been well received in the chess world. Overall, the opinions are very positive. John Watson gave it a very positive review , and Jacob Aagaard has listed it among the top 10 books of the 20th century . It is also mentioned in another list of 'best' books ....
Post a Comment
Read more

Understanding middlegames

Have you ever found yourself unable to find a move in the middlegame? Of course you have. We all have. About ten years ago, this was a recurring problem for me, which led to a lot of frustration. My conclusion was that I needed to learn how understand middlegames. So what better way than to read a book with the title Understanding Chess Middlegames ? Sound like the perfect remedy, right? Ok, let's find out. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron!   What can you expect from this book? I first read this book when I was just starting to study chess seriously. I bought it after reading a recommendation in an online forum. I would say this was ten years ago, but the book came out 2011, so it couldn't have been before that. Anyhow, my playing strength was probably around 1200 (I was unrated at the time) and I was having trouble choosing moves in non-tactical positions. Basically, I was playing without ...
1 comment
Read more

Estimating playing strength

Have you ever felt like your chess rating doesn't represent your actual playing strength? Sometimes we want to be able to estimate playing strength based on individual games rather than rating (which changes more slowly). During the past few months, I've been taking a number of online courses and learning python for data analysis. In one of the courses, the final project allowed me to choose my own dataset. So surprise surprise! I chose something chess related. (Not really surprised, are you?) When we play games online, getting a computer evaluation is just a few clicks away. And a commonly used statistic is the average centipawn loss, or simply the average deviation from the computer's best move. Many of us tend to think that centipawn loss (CPL) is a good estimate of playing strength. And, of course, it gives some indication, but it's far from a perfect predictor. Fellow chess/statistics blogger Patrick Coulombe has investigated the correlation between rating and CPL ...
Post a Comment
Read more

1001 Checkmates

Modern Chess is too much concerned with things like Pawn structure. Forget it, Checkmate ends the game. This statement by Nigel Short may trigger different reactions in the chess experts of the world. Some may argue that it oversimplifies the game, since it is not possible to play for checkmate in all positions. On the other hand, it quite correctly pinpoints a major problem for beginning players in that they simply don't know how to end the game. I've seen this in our kids classes at my local club. The kids can be up a ton of material, but they don't know how to checkmate their opponent. A common piece of advice served to beginners is "do a lot of tactics". And I agree that this is a good idea. But I think we should expand on that advice and suggest that beginners (and stronger players) "do a lot of checkmates". And what better way to do this than go through a checkmate puzzle book? If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visi...
Post a Comment
Read more