Skip to main content

Chaos on the board

Have you ever felt tired of chess? Maybe you’ve been uninspired or perhaps you think it’s too much work. To paraphrase a famous movie: All work and no play makes you a dull person. If that is the case, I may have a cure. You need a fun chess book. Something that will rekindle your joy for the game and inspire you to play creatively. I give you Tiger’s Chaos Theory!

This book found me at a time when I needed it the most. My inspiration and motivation to study chess was way down. And like a bolt from the blue, the Swedish Chess Federation approached me and wanted me to review this book. And the kind people at Quality Chess agreed to send me a review copy. An offer I couldn't refuse. So after this happy turn of events, I have a new review for you.

If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details.
Become a Patron!

What can you expect from this book?

Grandmaster Tiger Hillarp Persson, a multi-time Swedish chess champion, has already made his mark as an author with two books on his favorite opening, the Modern. But in Tiger’s Chaos Theory, he breaks away from opening theory entirely to challenge how we think about chess itself. This isn’t your typical training manual – it’s more of an invitation to rethink the rules and get inspired.

At its core, Tiger’s Chaos Theory is about chess improvement, but it defies tradition. There’s no walkthrough of openings, strategies, or endgames here, and definitely no puzzles. Instead, Tiger leads us through ten chapters of pure chess inspiration, packed with games featuring everything from dubious sacrifices to tactical and positional brilliance. With a selection of elite-level games—split between his own and his peers’—Tiger gives us a front-row seat to both creativity and chaos on the board.

What started out as a book about creativity ended up as something else – but not quite.
As far as I understand, Tiger was requested to write a book about creativity in chess, but the book ended up as something far more than that. In the book, Tiger questions many of the received “truths” about chess. Unlike the masters of the past, he argues that the game cannot be reduced to something strictly logical. He also claims that chess principles often contradict one another and can be more of a hindrance than a help if you follow them too rigidly. A simple example is that rooks belong on open files, but also behind passed pawns, and on the seventh rank. All good advice, but they can’t all apply at once. This, Tiger argues, is why we need to use these principles as rough guidelines, allowing intuition to take the lead when necessary. Breaking the rules, he suggests, is often the way forward.

In many ways, Tiger’s Chaos Theory has the same feel as Under the Surface by Jan Markos. If these two authors were to team up, they’d either create a masterpiece or get so lost in philosophy they’d never make it to print. But if you enjoy books that make you think as much as they improve your play, this one will be right up your alley. Among other things, Tiger suggests that every player keep a collection of intriguing games – this book itself is a great start, filled with examples that will inspire you to play more creatively. I have enjoyed this book a lot, and recommend it wholeheartedly.

Who should read this book?

Tiger’s Chaos Theory is an engaging, enjoyable read – one best taken in by a fireside, perhaps with a favorite drink in hand. But don’t let the laid-back tone fool you; this book demands focus. It’s aimed at advanced players, ideally those with a solid grasp of tactics and strategy. The analysis is detailed, and keeping up with the nuances will challenge even seasoned players. To get the most out of it, a rating of 2000 or higher is recommended, but ambitious players with lower ratings will still find much to enjoy – if they’re ready to take on a challenge. So, if you’re looking to push the boundaries of your game, this book might just be your ticket.

About this book

Author:Tiger Hillarp Persson
Title:Tiger's Chaos Theory
Type of book:Chess improvement, Miscellaneous
Level:Advanced
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular reviews

Winning chess strategies

Chess strategy is one of the most elusive and difficult parts of chess. Compared to the direct and transparent world of chess tactics, strategy can be confusing and opaque. At the patzer level, tactical strikes that gain material or lead to checkmate can be obvious (provided that one understands the tactic). However, in many cases, strong players claim that a move is obvious although it doesn't result in material gain or even a semblance of an attack. We, the patzers of the world, scratch our heads and wonder how on earth anyone can find such moves obvious. How can we take steps towards this deeper level of chess understanding? Picking up a basic strategy book is a good first step. And that's what I did here. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from this book? As a part of my ambition to deepen my understanding of chess strategy, I took on a mission of reading (and rev...
Post a Comment
Read more

My system should be your system?

One of the greates classics of chess literature. That's at least what it says on the cover. But let's not judge a book by the cover. Instead, we could listen to what others have said about this book. In his review of My system , John Watson writes: "We no longer consider many classics to be essential to a chess education, not since the Internet; but if there’s an exception, Nimzowitch’s work is it". These are big words from a big man. Watson is an authority of chess theory, so his evaluation should not be taken too lightly. Although My system has frequently been mentioned among the greatest books of all time, and has been recommended by many players , it has also been the subject of controversy. Of course, when the book was first published (almost 100 years ago), many ideas in the book challenged many of the established principles of chess theory at the time, and other authorities dismissed the ideas. But also to this day, many people are unimpressed with the b...
Post a Comment
Read more

Estimating playing strength

Have you ever felt like your chess rating doesn't represent your actual playing strength? Sometimes we want to be able to estimate playing strength based on individual games rather than rating (which changes more slowly). During the past few months, I've been taking a number of online courses and learning python for data analysis. In one of the courses, the final project allowed me to choose my own dataset. So surprise surprise! I chose something chess related. (Not really surprised, are you?) When we play games online, getting a computer evaluation is just a few clicks away. And a commonly used statistic is the average centipawn loss, or simply the average deviation from the computer's best move. Many of us tend to think that centipawn loss (CPL) is a good estimate of playing strength. And, of course, it gives some indication, but it's far from a perfect predictor. Fellow chess/statistics blogger Patrick Coulombe has investigated the correlation between rating and CPL ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Understanding middlegames

Have you ever found yourself unable to find a move in the middlegame? Of course you have. We all have. About ten years ago, this was a recurring problem for me, which led to a lot of frustration. My conclusion was that I needed to learn how understand middlegames. So what better way than to read a book with the title Understanding Chess Middlegames ? Sound like the perfect remedy, right? Ok, let's find out. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron!   What can you expect from this book? I first read this book when I was just starting to study chess seriously. I bought it after reading a recommendation in an online forum. I would say this was ten years ago, but the book came out 2011, so it couldn't have been before that. Anyhow, my playing strength was probably around 1200 (I was unrated at the time) and I was having trouble choosing moves in non-tactical positions. Basically, I was playing without ...
1 comment
Read more