A guide to chess improvement

During the past years, I have sporadically read Dan Heisman's old Novice nook articles. And they are really great. When I realized that Dan had put together the best of Novice Nook in a book called A guide to chess improvement, I felt I had to read it. This review is based on a post on my previous blog on chess.com. And I thought it was a good article to include here.

What can you expect from this book?

This book is really good, but it also hurts to read. Because reading the book made me realize that I have some fundamental issues that I need to iron out in order to become a better player. According to Dan, there are three skills that must be mastered before going for more advanced studies.

Play slowly enough to identify and properly evaluate candidate moves.
Ensure that the selected move is safe, which means checking for your opponent's tactics.
Develop the pieces to squares where they have activity and can do something constructive.

Why is this important? The simple reason is that if you (like me) make unsafe moves that lose material or allow your opponent to checkmate you, nothing else matters. You can play like a grandmaster for 25 moves, but if your 26th move is unsafe and hangs a queen, you will still lose the game. Or, as Dan puts it:

All the chess knowledge in the world won't help you if, each time you move, you don't take your time and use the information that is applicable to your current position.

This has been my problem. I have spent countless hours doing tactics and developing my knowledge of openings, positional play and endgames. But I don't have the results to show for it. The explanation is as clear as day: I play too quickly, and make unsafe moves. More often than not, these moves lead to bad or simply lost positions. This means that my studies do not produce the results that I expect them to. I have known for some time that I often lose due to unsafe moves, but I have not really embraced the fact. Instead, I have focused on other parts of the game and tried to boost ego and tell myself that "I played quite well apart from that one stupid blunder". And from this, I have concluded that there is not really anything wrong with my chess. I just make the occasional bad move. Right?

After reading Dan's book, I see this in a new light. I realize that I make a lot of the basic mistakes that Dan comes back to again and again. I do not play slow enough, I do not play safely, and I often place my pieces passively. As long as I keep making these basic mistakes, my chess performance will not increase, regardless of how much opening theory or endgame knowledge I gain.

The book is divided into nine different sections: General improvement, thought process, time management, skills and psychology, tactics and safety, openings, endgame and technique, strategy and positional play, and a collection of shorter lesson material. Each section is divided into between 2 and 8 chapters

Since most of the content is available through Dan's webpage, you can check it out and see if you like his writing. That's what I did, and I felt that this was a book I needed on my shelf. I have read the book several times, and I come back to it again and again, hence the multiple book marks.

Who should read this book?

This is a book that should be interesting for a wide audience. It mainly targets beginners and club players, but should also be interesting for chess coaches and parents of budding chess masters. The book provides excellent tips for chess training, recommended books and which order to read them and a lot more. If you are a patzer like me, I urge you to read this book!

About this book

Author:	Dan Heisman
Title:	A guide to chess improvement
Type of book:	Chess improvement
Level:	Beginner/Intermediate

Comments

Popular reviews

Chaos on the board

Have you ever felt tired of chess? Maybe you’ve been uninspired or perhaps you think it’s too much work. To paraphrase a famous movie: All work and no play makes you a dull person. If that is the case, I may have a cure. You need a fun chess book. Something that will rekindle your joy for the game and inspire you to play creatively. I give you Tiger’s Chaos Theory ! This book found me at a time when I needed it the most. My inspiration and motivation to study chess was way down. And like a bolt from the blue, the Swedish Chess Federation approached me and wanted me to review this book. And the kind people at Quality Chess agreed to send me a review copy. An offer I couldn't refuse. So after this happy turn of events, I have a new review for you. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from this book? Grandmaster Tiger Hillarp Persson, a multi-time Swedish chess champion, has al...

Understanding middlegames

Have you ever found yourself unable to find a move in the middlegame? Of course you have. We all have. About ten years ago, this was a recurring problem for me, which led to a lot of frustration. My conclusion was that I needed to learn how understand middlegames. So what better way than to read a book with the title Understanding Chess Middlegames ? Sound like the perfect remedy, right? Ok, let's find out. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from this book? I first read this book when I was just starting to study chess seriously. I bought it after reading a recommendation in an online forum. I would say this was ten years ago, but the book came out 2011, so it couldn't have been before that. Anyhow, my playing strength was probably around 1200 (I was unrated at the time) and I was having trouble choosing moves in non-tactical positions. Basically, I was playing without ...

My system should be your system?

One of the greates classics of chess literature. That's at least what it says on the cover. But let's not judge a book by the cover. Instead, we could listen to what others have said about this book. In his review of My system , John Watson writes: "We no longer consider many classics to be essential to a chess education, not since the Internet; but if there’s an exception, Nimzowitch’s work is it". These are big words from a big man. Watson is an authority of chess theory, so his evaluation should not be taken too lightly. Although My system has frequently been mentioned among the greatest books of all time, and has been recommended by many players , it has also been the subject of controversy. Of course, when the book was first published (almost 100 years ago), many ideas in the book challenged many of the established principles of chess theory at the time, and other authorities dismissed the ideas. But also to this day, many people are unimpressed with the b...

Estimating playing strength

Have you ever felt like your chess rating doesn't represent your actual playing strength? Sometimes we want to be able to estimate playing strength based on individual games rather than rating (which changes more slowly). During the past few months, I've been taking a number of online courses and learning python for data analysis. In one of the courses, the final project allowed me to choose my own dataset. So surprise surprise! I chose something chess related. (Not really surprised, are you?) When we play games online, getting a computer evaluation is just a few clicks away. And a commonly used statistic is the average centipawn loss, or simply the average deviation from the computer's best move. Many of us tend to think that centipawn loss (CPL) is a good estimate of playing strength. And, of course, it gives some indication, but it's far from a perfect predictor. Fellow chess/statistics blogger Patrick Coulombe has investigated the correlation between rating and CPL ...

Winning chess strategies

Chess strategy is one of the most elusive and difficult parts of chess. Compared to the direct and transparent world of chess tactics, strategy can be confusing and opaque. At the patzer level, tactical strikes that gain material or lead to checkmate can be obvious (provided that one understands the tactic). However, in many cases, strong players claim that a move is obvious although it doesn't result in material gain or even a semblance of an attack. We, the patzers of the world, scratch our heads and wonder how on earth anyone can find such moves obvious. How can we take steps towards this deeper level of chess understanding? Picking up a basic strategy book is a good first step. And that's what I did here. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from this book? As a part of my ambition to deepen my understanding of chess strategy, I took on a mission of reading (and rev...

Patzer's review

Search This Blog