Skip to main content

A guide to chess improvement

During the past years, I have sporadically read Dan Heisman's old Novice nook articles. And they are really great. When I realized that Dan had put together the best of Novice Nook in a book called A guide to chess improvement, I felt I had to read it. This review is based on a post on my previous blog on chess.com. And I thought it was a good article to include here.

What can you expect from this book?

This book is really good, but it also hurts to read. Because reading the book made me realize that I have some fundamental issues that I need to iron out in order to become a better player. According to Dan, there are three skills that must be mastered before going for more advanced studies.
  1. Play slowly enough to identify and properly evaluate candidate moves.
  2. Ensure that the selected move is safe, which means checking for your opponent's tactics.
  3. Develop the pieces to squares where they have activity and can do something constructive.
Why is this important? The simple reason is that if you (like me) make unsafe moves that lose material or allow your opponent to checkmate you, nothing else matters. You can play like a grandmaster for 25 moves, but if your 26th move is unsafe and hangs a queen, you will still lose the game. Or, as Dan puts it:
All the chess knowledge in the world won't help you if, each time you move, you don't take your time and use the information that is applicable to your current position.
This has been my problem. I have spent countless hours doing tactics and developing my knowledge of openings, positional play and endgames. But I don't have the results to show for it. The explanation is as clear as day: I play too quickly, and make unsafe moves. More often than not, these moves lead to bad or simply lost positions. This means that my studies do not produce the results that I expect them to. I have known for some time that I often lose due to unsafe moves, but I have not really embraced the fact. Instead, I have focused on other parts of the game and tried to boost ego and tell myself that "I played quite well apart from that one stupid blunder". And from this, I have concluded that there is not really anything wrong with my chess. I just make the occasional bad move. Right?

After reading Dan's book, I see this in a new light. I realize that I make a lot of the basic mistakes that Dan comes back to again and again. I do not play slow enough, I do not play safely, and I often place my pieces passively. As long as I keep making these basic mistakes, my chess performance will not increase, regardless of how much opening theory or endgame knowledge I gain.

The book is divided into nine different sections: General improvement, thought process, time management, skills and psychology, tactics and safety, openings, endgame and technique, strategy and positional play, and a collection of shorter lesson material. Each section is divided into between 2 and 8 chapters

Since most of the content is available through Dan's webpage, you can check it out and see if you like his writing. That's what I did, and I felt that this was a book I needed on my shelf. I have read the book several times, and I come back to it again and again, hence the multiple book marks.

Who should read this book?

This is a book that should be interesting for a wide audience. It mainly targets beginners and club players, but should also be interesting for chess coaches and parents of budding chess masters. The book provides excellent tips for chess training, recommended books and which order to read them and a lot more. If you are a patzer like me, I urge you to read this book!

About this book

Author:Dan Heisman
Title:A guide to chess improvement
Type of book:Chess improvement
Level:Beginner/Intermediate

Comments

Popular reviews

Under the surface

I did something different. I bought a chess book without doing any research. I decided to reward myself with a new book after having written ten reviews. So I asked my friends on Twitter for suggestions, and someone suggested that I take a look at the book Under the surface by Jan Markos. Since the book is quite new, I couldn't find much information about it, so I decided to blindly trust the recommendation. Luckily, I was not let down. What can you expect from this book? I am not the only one who has done something different. Jan Markos did the same when he wrote Under the surface . He takes a quite philosophical approach to chess, which should probably be expected from a former student of philosophy. This comes across quite clearly in his choice of chapter titles. The names "Magnetic Skin", "Anatoly Karpov's Billiard Balls" and "On the Breaking Ice" are not the most transparent chapter titles in the world. But once you get under the surfa...

Master of strategy

During the past two years, I’ve been working on improving my strategic/positional play. In this process, I have read a number of books, and two books that have long been on my reading list are the strategy books by Johan Hellsten. So when the Swedish chess federation requested reviewers for two of these books, I didn’t hesitate. I am happy that I was given the opportunity to review these books, and hope this review can be of help to you as a reader. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from these books? Johan Hellsten has created a name for himself as one of the leading experts of chess strategy in modern times. His series of strategy books ( Mastering Opening Strategy , Mastering Chess Strategy and Mastering Endgame Strategy ) have received glowing reviews from many parts of the chess world. So it feels good to finally dig into these nuggets. His endgame book is still in my boo...

My system should be your system?

One of the greates classics of chess literature. That's at least what it says on the cover. But let's not judge a book by the cover. Instead, we could listen to what others have said about this book. In his review of My system , John Watson writes: "We no longer consider many classics to be essential to a chess education, not since the Internet; but if there’s an exception, Nimzowitch’s work is it". These are big words from a big man. Watson is an authority of chess theory, so his evaluation should not be taken too lightly. Although My system has frequently been mentioned among the greatest books of all time, and has been recommended by many players , it has also been the subject of controversy. Of course, when the book was first published (almost 100 years ago), many ideas in the book challenged many of the established principles of chess theory at the time, and other authorities dismissed the ideas. But also to this day, many people are unimpressed with the b...

Judgement and planning

Some books "fly under the radar" and do not get the same attention as the evergreen classics. But sometimes, there is gold in old mines. And I found a little golden nugget while shopping for used books. A book written for amateurs, by (arguably) the best amateur of all time; former world champion Max Euwe. Sounds promising, right? If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from this book? In my previous review of Chess Fundamentals , said that few world champions have written books for beginners and intermediate players. Capablanca is, of course, one exception. And another is Max Euwe. Euwe is not the most well-known world champion. He was in his prime in the 1930s and 1940s, most notably in 1935 when he dethroned none other than the great Alexander Alekhine. Although many have suggested that Alekhine only lost because of heavy use of alcohol, beating him is no small feat (rega...

Think first or think later? - part 1

This is a different kind of review. It's not just a review of one book, but two (actually three). Therefore, it's written in two parts, and this is part 1. I have chosen the book Move first, think later by Willy Hendriks and Understanding before moving by Herman Grooten (which is actually a series, with two books so far). The main reason I chose these books is that the titles indicate completely opposite views of how to approach chess: Think before you move or just move and think later. So how should a patzer like me make sense of this? I read the book on Forward Chess , which was a new experience for me. The service is available for various operative systems. I used the app on my iPad. One advantage is that it allows you to click through the variations instead of just visualizing them in your head. You can of course skip this, if you want to train your visualization skills. Another good thing is that you can try out various moves that are not in the book and switch on an ...