Skip to main content

Learn chess tactics

Where should you turn for tactics training? This is a frequently occuring question, not only from beginners, but also from intermediate players. Which books are suitable for your specific level, and which ones should you get? In this review, I take on a book that I suggest you do get - at least if you're at or near the beginning of your chess development.

This was actually my first tactics book back in the day, and I recently reread it in order to give a proper review. I remember that I liked it the first time around and that my tactical skills improved. Although rereading it didn't contribute all that much to my learning, I still have a good impression of it. Please read on for more details.

If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details.
Become a Patron!

What can you expect from this book?

Learn Chess Tactics is written by the one and only John Nunn, and (as the name implies) it is a tactics book. I would go as far as to say it is a very typical tactics book; the chapters are based on various tactical themes and the book finishes off with a collection of combinations.

The book has 14 chapters, 12 of which are 'themed' and two that are a bit different. We'll get back to those.

Chapter
No. puzzles
1Fork46
2Discovered attack26
3Pin31
4Skewer6
5Deflection27
6Trapped piece16
7Removing the Guard8
8Opening and Closing Lines6
9Back-Rank Mate12
10Pawn Promotion14
11In-Between Moves4
12Defensive Tactics16
13Combinations36
14Miscellaneous Exercises66


Each chapter begins with a short introduction that defines the tactical theme and gives a few examples. After that, it's on to the puzzles.

John Nunn is a former world champion of chess problem and well-known for his complex and deep analyses. But although this book is written by him, the puzzles are not super hard. My guess is that players within the indicated rating range should be able to solve most puzzles in 5 min or less. At least for the first 12 chapters, since you know which tactical theme to look for. Chapter 13 is a bit harder, as you are expected to combine themes, which makes solving somewhat more complex. And in the final chapter, you get a mix of puzzles, which also increases the challenge. This being said, this is an introductory tactics book, so you should not be afraid.

A good quality of the book is that the puzzle difficulty is fairly consistent. Some other tactics books combine super-simple one-move tactics that you find in a heartbeat and insanely complicated ones that you spend 15 minutes trying to solve and end up with a severe headache. I am glad to say that this is not one of those books.

Another thing I like about this book is that the puzzles are from actual games, and sometimes the 'victim' is a renowned grandmaster. So if you at some point feel bad about falling for a tactic, the book gives examples of players such as Anatoly Karpov, Garry Kasparov, Sergei Karjakin and Nigel Short. As Nunn put it (p. 91):
If Kasparov can fall victim to this sort of oversight, then anybody can!
I don't know about you, but when I see a world-class player blunder I feel a bit better about my own chess. It's a small consolation, but still.

As the title suggests, this is an basic tactics book. For me, it was my very first one, and I feel good about that choice.  I had no experience playing over the board or competing seriously, and I had an online rating of about 1400. At that level, the book was really right for me. Nunn writes in the introduction that aim of the book is to "provide a basic course in chess tactics". He defines the prerequisites, which is knowin the rules. That's it! He does say that you need to know algebraic notation, but then he goes on to explain it, so it's not really a prerequisite. In other words, if you know the rules and want to learn the basics of chess tactics, then this should be a good book to get you started.

Who should read this book?

This is an excellent introduction to chess tactics. It may be a bit challenging for absolute beginners, but I believe it would be a good first tactics book for many aspiring players. In terms of rating, it is probably best for players in the 1000-1500 range. Stronger players can also benefit from it by using the "woodpecker method" and cement their tactical foundation. I enjoyed reading this book as a beginner, and I enjoyed it again as an intermediate(ish) player, so I am happy to give this book a wholehearted recommendation.

About this book

Author:John Nunn
Title:Learn Chess Tactics
Type of book:Tactics
Level:Beginner, (Intermediate)

Comments

Popular reviews

Judgement and planning

Some books "fly under the radar" and do not get the same attention as the evergreen classics. But sometimes, there is gold in old mines. And I found a little golden nugget while shopping for used books. A book written for amateurs, by (arguably) the best amateur of all time; former world champion Max Euwe. Sounds promising, right? If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from this book? In my previous review of Chess Fundamentals , said that few world champions have written books for beginners and intermediate players. Capablanca is, of course, one exception. And another is Max Euwe. Euwe is not the most well-known world champion. He was in his prime in the 1930s and 1940s, most notably in 1935 when he dethroned none other than the great Alexander Alekhine. Although many have suggested that Alekhine only lost because of heavy use of alcohol, beating him is no small feat (rega...

Nunn’s secrets

Let me tell you a secret. There is no such thing as 'the best chess books'. It all depends on the preferences and expectations of the reader and of course the work s/he puts in when working with the book. So just because someone else claims that a certain book belongs in the 'best books of all time' category, it does not necessarily mean that it is a book that you will appreciate. This little intro may have given away the content of this review, but that's ok. Secrets of practical chess is an example of a book that has gotten a lot of praise on a more than one occasion. So let's dig in and see what the fuss is all about. What can you expect from this book? Secrets of practical chess has seemingly been well received in the chess world. Overall, the opinions are very positive. John Watson gave it a very positive review , and Jacob Aagaard has listed it among the top 10 books of the 20th century . It is also mentioned in another list of 'best' books ....

Understanding middlegames

Have you ever found yourself unable to find a move in the middlegame? Of course you have. We all have. About ten years ago, this was a recurring problem for me, which led to a lot of frustration. My conclusion was that I needed to learn how understand middlegames. So what better way than to read a book with the title Understanding Chess Middlegames ? Sound like the perfect remedy, right? Ok, let's find out. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron!   What can you expect from this book? I first read this book when I was just starting to study chess seriously. I bought it after reading a recommendation in an online forum. I would say this was ten years ago, but the book came out 2011, so it couldn't have been before that. Anyhow, my playing strength was probably around 1200 (I was unrated at the time) and I was having trouble choosing moves in non-tactical positions. Basically, I was playing without ...

Estimating playing strength

Have you ever felt like your chess rating doesn't represent your actual playing strength? Sometimes we want to be able to estimate playing strength based on individual games rather than rating (which changes more slowly). During the past few months, I've been taking a number of online courses and learning python for data analysis. In one of the courses, the final project allowed me to choose my own dataset. So surprise surprise! I chose something chess related. (Not really surprised, are you?) When we play games online, getting a computer evaluation is just a few clicks away. And a commonly used statistic is the average centipawn loss, or simply the average deviation from the computer's best move. Many of us tend to think that centipawn loss (CPL) is a good estimate of playing strength. And, of course, it gives some indication, but it's far from a perfect predictor. Fellow chess/statistics blogger Patrick Coulombe has investigated the correlation between rating and CPL ...

Questions of modern chess theory

A Soviet classic - that's what it says on the front cover. And for good reason, I think. At the beginning of this year, I decided I would invest some time studying strategy books. I already had a number of them in my collection, and then I stumbled upon a thread in the facebook group ”chess book collectors”. The post contained some controversial claims about the book Question of modern chess theory , which was unfamiliar to me at the time. The post and the ensuing discussions piqued my interest, and I decided to check it out. After some research, I realized that this was a stepping stone for many other books, so I put it at the top of my reading list. I read it during the summer, but haven't got around to writing a review before now. So I actually had to read it again. Anywho, I am finally ready to share my thoughts with the world. Hope you enjoy it. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! Wha...