Skip to main content

Learn chess tactics

Where should you turn for tactics training? This is a frequently occuring question, not only from beginners, but also from intermediate players. Which books are suitable for your specific level, and which ones should you get? In this review, I take on a book that I suggest you do get - at least if you're at or near the beginning of your chess development.

This was actually my first tactics book back in the day, and I recently reread it in order to give a proper review. I remember that I liked it the first time around and that my tactical skills improved. Although rereading it didn't contribute all that much to my learning, I still have a good impression of it. Please read on for more details.

If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details.
Become a Patron!

What can you expect from this book?

Learn Chess Tactics is written by the one and only John Nunn, and (as the name implies) it is a tactics book. I would go as far as to say it is a very typical tactics book; the chapters are based on various tactical themes and the book finishes off with a collection of combinations.

The book has 14 chapters, 12 of which are 'themed' and two that are a bit different. We'll get back to those.

Chapter
No. puzzles
1Fork46
2Discovered attack26
3Pin31
4Skewer6
5Deflection27
6Trapped piece16
7Removing the Guard8
8Opening and Closing Lines6
9Back-Rank Mate12
10Pawn Promotion14
11In-Between Moves4
12Defensive Tactics16
13Combinations36
14Miscellaneous Exercises66


Each chapter begins with a short introduction that defines the tactical theme and gives a few examples. After that, it's on to the puzzles.

John Nunn is a former world champion of chess problem and well-known for his complex and deep analyses. But although this book is written by him, the puzzles are not super hard. My guess is that players within the indicated rating range should be able to solve most puzzles in 5 min or less. At least for the first 12 chapters, since you know which tactical theme to look for. Chapter 13 is a bit harder, as you are expected to combine themes, which makes solving somewhat more complex. And in the final chapter, you get a mix of puzzles, which also increases the challenge. This being said, this is an introductory tactics book, so you should not be afraid.

A good quality of the book is that the puzzle difficulty is fairly consistent. Some other tactics books combine super-simple one-move tactics that you find in a heartbeat and insanely complicated ones that you spend 15 minutes trying to solve and end up with a severe headache. I am glad to say that this is not one of those books.

Another thing I like about this book is that the puzzles are from actual games, and sometimes the 'victim' is a renowned grandmaster. So if you at some point feel bad about falling for a tactic, the book gives examples of players such as Anatoly Karpov, Garry Kasparov, Sergei Karjakin and Nigel Short. As Nunn put it (p. 91):
If Kasparov can fall victim to this sort of oversight, then anybody can!
I don't know about you, but when I see a world-class player blunder I feel a bit better about my own chess. It's a small consolation, but still.

As the title suggests, this is an basic tactics book. For me, it was my very first one, and I feel good about that choice.  I had no experience playing over the board or competing seriously, and I had an online rating of about 1400. At that level, the book was really right for me. Nunn writes in the introduction that aim of the book is to "provide a basic course in chess tactics". He defines the prerequisites, which is knowin the rules. That's it! He does say that you need to know algebraic notation, but then he goes on to explain it, so it's not really a prerequisite. In other words, if you know the rules and want to learn the basics of chess tactics, then this should be a good book to get you started.

Who should read this book?

This is an excellent introduction to chess tactics. It may be a bit challenging for absolute beginners, but I believe it would be a good first tactics book for many aspiring players. In terms of rating, it is probably best for players in the 1000-1500 range. Stronger players can also benefit from it by using the "woodpecker method" and cement their tactical foundation. I enjoyed reading this book as a beginner, and I enjoyed it again as an intermediate(ish) player, so I am happy to give this book a wholehearted recommendation.

About this book

Author:John Nunn
Title:Learn Chess Tactics
Type of book:Tactics
Level:Beginner, (Intermediate)

Comments

Popular reviews

Understanding middlegames

Have you ever found yourself unable to find a move in the middlegame? Of course you have. We all have. About ten years ago, this was a recurring problem for me, which led to a lot of frustration. My conclusion was that I needed to learn how understand middlegames. So what better way than to read a book with the title Understanding Chess Middlegames ? Sound like the perfect remedy, right? Ok, let's find out. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron!   What can you expect from this book? I first read this book when I was just starting to study chess seriously. I bought it after reading a recommendation in an online forum. I would say this was ten years ago, but the book came out 2011, so it couldn't have been before that. Anyhow, my playing strength was probably around 1200 (I was unrated at the time) and I was having trouble choosing moves in non-tactical positions. Basically, I was playing without ...

Chaos on the board

Have you ever felt tired of chess? Maybe you’ve been uninspired or perhaps you think it’s too much work. To paraphrase a famous movie: All work and no play makes you a dull person. If that is the case, I may have a cure. You need a fun chess book. Something that will rekindle your joy for the game and inspire you to play creatively. I give you Tiger’s Chaos Theory ! This book found me at a time when I needed it the most. My inspiration and motivation to study chess was way down. And like a bolt from the blue, the Swedish Chess Federation approached me and wanted me to review this book. And the kind people at Quality Chess agreed to send me a review copy. An offer I couldn't refuse. So after this happy turn of events, I have a new review for you. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from this book? Grandmaster Tiger Hillarp Persson, a multi-time Swedish chess champion, has al...

My system should be your system?

One of the greates classics of chess literature. That's at least what it says on the cover. But let's not judge a book by the cover. Instead, we could listen to what others have said about this book. In his review of My system , John Watson writes: "We no longer consider many classics to be essential to a chess education, not since the Internet; but if there’s an exception, Nimzowitch’s work is it". These are big words from a big man. Watson is an authority of chess theory, so his evaluation should not be taken too lightly. Although My system has frequently been mentioned among the greatest books of all time, and has been recommended by many players , it has also been the subject of controversy. Of course, when the book was first published (almost 100 years ago), many ideas in the book challenged many of the established principles of chess theory at the time, and other authorities dismissed the ideas. But also to this day, many people are unimpressed with the b...

Under the surface

I did something different. I bought a chess book without doing any research. I decided to reward myself with a new book after having written ten reviews. So I asked my friends on Twitter for suggestions, and someone suggested that I take a look at the book Under the surface by Jan Markos. Since the book is quite new, I couldn't find much information about it, so I decided to blindly trust the recommendation. Luckily, I was not let down. What can you expect from this book? I am not the only one who has done something different. Jan Markos did the same when he wrote Under the surface . He takes a quite philosophical approach to chess, which should probably be expected from a former student of philosophy. This comes across quite clearly in his choice of chapter titles. The names "Magnetic Skin", "Anatoly Karpov's Billiard Balls" and "On the Breaking Ice" are not the most transparent chapter titles in the world. But once you get under the surfa...

Estimating playing strength

Have you ever felt like your chess rating doesn't represent your actual playing strength? Sometimes we want to be able to estimate playing strength based on individual games rather than rating (which changes more slowly). During the past few months, I've been taking a number of online courses and learning python for data analysis. In one of the courses, the final project allowed me to choose my own dataset. So surprise surprise! I chose something chess related. (Not really surprised, are you?) When we play games online, getting a computer evaluation is just a few clicks away. And a commonly used statistic is the average centipawn loss, or simply the average deviation from the computer's best move. Many of us tend to think that centipawn loss (CPL) is a good estimate of playing strength. And, of course, it gives some indication, but it's far from a perfect predictor. Fellow chess/statistics blogger Patrick Coulombe has investigated the correlation between rating and CPL ...