Skip to main content

Think first or think later? - part 1

This is a different kind of review. It's not just a review of one book, but two (actually three). Therefore, it's written in two parts, and this is part 1. I have chosen the book Move first, think later by Willy Hendriks and Understanding before moving by Herman Grooten (which is actually a series, with two books so far). The main reason I chose these books is that the titles indicate completely opposite views of how to approach chess: Think before you move or just move and think later. So how should a patzer like me make sense of this?

I read the book on Forward Chess, which was a new experience for me. The service is available for various operative systems. I used the app on my iPad. One advantage is that it allows you to click through the variations instead of just visualizing them in your head. You can of course skip this, if you want to train your visualization skills. Another good thing is that you can try out various moves that are not in the book and switch on an engine to get a computer evaluation. Very handy if you come across a tricky tactic that is over your head. That being said, the reading experience is different on a screen, and it is probably not for everyone. I wouldn't recommend it for a "talky" book like this.

What can you expect from this book?

Move first, think later has received a lot of praise, and even an award! Hendriks indicates that he aims to provoke and challenge conventional wisdom. I am sure that he will succeed in provoking just about any reader. As the title indicates, Hendriks proposes a quite "loose" approach to learning chess, based on developing your intuition. However, for a patzer like me, Hendriks' advice is meaningless. I cannot trust my intuition, because it is often wrong! And how am I supposed to improve my intuition unless I have something to hold on to?

Jeremy Silman wrote a quite critical review of this book. This is probably no surprise, as the two gentlemen have quite opposite views of how to teach and learn chess. (Edit: Silman has written another post, in which he expresses both praise and critique of Hendriks’ book) Silman is a strong proponent of a systematic approach to chess based on analyses of imbalances (see my review of The Amateur's Mind for a short summary). Hendriks takes on just about every chess author who is even remotely suggesting a such a systematic approach, and seems to think that this is pure nonsense and a complete waste of time. Instead, you should trust your instincts and just play good moves. This is illustrated by the quote below.
The narrative in middlegame manuals is not of great importance – putting your hope in them and skipping the actual chess is a sure way of learning nothing. (...) Put some trust in the chess knowledge you bring to the board.
I am not even sure what Hendriks means by "skipping the actual chess". He seems to be of the opinion that chess itself and how we think about it is too complex to describe in a clear and systematic way, so every attempt to do so is futile.
To questions like: Ê»How do I create a weakness?’ and Ê»How do I counter my opponent’s initiative?’ no answers are possible except one: play good moves!
This quote reminds me of this one time, at the chess club... A strong player at my club looked at one of my games, and he complained that I insisted on making bad moves all the time. Although this is obviously true, it is an absolutely useless comment. How do you improve? Just play better chess! Gee, thanks, that's really good advice! #sarcasm

Of course, Hendriks does have a point; every attempt to create a "protocol" for playing chess will need to be a simplification and therefore, by definition, not entirely correct. I often say that "every model is incorrect" (since it is a simplification of reality), but that doesn't keep it from being useful. This point is also made in another critical review by John Watson. A "protocol" or "checklist" from a middle game book is like a safety net; if you are already a strong player, you don't need it. But for weaker players, it can prevent a lot of pain.

I have to admit that the book is entertaining at times, and there are actually a few interesting puzzles. However, although I would like to, I cannot recommend this book. First of all, it seems more like a draft than a finished book. Furthermore, the text is a mix of anecdotes and general rants with the occasional reference to prominent researchers and philosophers. The chess seems to be inserted in a rather random fashion, and has only a marginal connection to the overall text. The book's main message can be summarized in one simple exhortation: Just play better moves!

Who should read this book?

It is very difficult to identify the target audience for Move first, think later. Since it is a book on chess improvement, one should think it is for improvers (i.e. patzers). However, the suggestions in the the book are probably only valid for strong players, which reduces the value for the rest of us. My conclusion is that this is a book to read if you want a light read and tend to enjoy philosophical discussions and random anecdotes about chess. It is a book about chess improvement (sort of), but if you are looking for advice on how to improve your chess, you should look elsewhere.

About this book

Author:Willy Hendriks
Title:Move first, think later
Type of book:Chess improvement
Level:Intermediate/Advanced

Comments

  1. I think the important idea from this book (which may not be clearly expressed), is that chess is mostly about patterns, and no verbal guidelines can substitute themselves for the reality of the chessboard. Although it's possible to express some of these patterns through words, you can't reverse-engineer the process and find the patterns (and the moves) from the words of wisdom. So all teachings should proceed from the positions.

    Long time ago, I was surprised when taking a lesson with a coach from Eastern Europe, as after correcting my mistakes, he wasn't elaborating on rules and principles but simply showed variations and ended them with : "you see". At that time, I thought it was a funny language expedient, but nowadays, I think it makes a lot of sense.

    So yes, Hendricks doesn't give very clear examples of his central idea, not does he leave much room for contestation, but I think he has a point.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I only know about this book from reading reviews and other discussions, but isn't the point of the title that concrete moves should be the starting point of your thought process ("this, this and this look like good ideas - let's see which of them work..."), not that you should just blitz moves out without thinking about them?

    And as Laurent says, I think his point about "skipping the actual chess" is that we develop the ability to produce good chess ideas by seeing examples of similar ideas in action (ie seeing "actual chess") rather than by reading descriptions in the abstract of how things ought to be done. I'm not 100% sure how far you can take it, but it certainly works as a corrective to the attitude that I had before reading it, which basically was that a chess book explains a principle in words and then just gives an example to prove how well the principle works, and if you trust the author you can just learn the principle and skip the example...

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular reviews

Under the surface

I did something different. I bought a chess book without doing any research. I decided to reward myself with a new book after having written ten reviews. So I asked my friends on Twitter for suggestions, and someone suggested that I take a look at the book Under the surface by Jan Markos. Since the book is quite new, I couldn't find much information about it, so I decided to blindly trust the recommendation. Luckily, I was not let down. What can you expect from this book? I am not the only one who has done something different. Jan Markos did the same when he wrote Under the surface . He takes a quite philosophical approach to chess, which should probably be expected from a former student of philosophy. This comes across quite clearly in his choice of chapter titles. The names "Magnetic Skin", "Anatoly Karpov's Billiard Balls" and "On the Breaking Ice" are not the most transparent chapter titles in the world. But once you get under the surfa

Judgement and planning

Some books "fly under the radar" and do not get the same attention as the evergreen classics. But sometimes, there is gold in old mines. And I found a little golden nugget while shopping for used books. A book written for amateurs, by (arguably) the best amateur of all time; former world champion Max Euwe. Sounds promising, right? If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from this book? In my previous review of Chess Fundamentals , said that few world champions have written books for beginners and intermediate players. Capablanca is, of course, one exception. And another is Max Euwe. Euwe is not the most well-known world champion. He was in his prime in the 1930s and 1940s, most notably in 1935 when he dethroned none other than the great Alexander Alekhine. Although many have suggested that Alekhine only lost because of heavy use of alcohol, beating him is no small feat (rega

Learn chess tactics

Where should you turn for tactics training? This is a frequently occuring question, not only from beginners, but also from intermediate players. Which books are suitable for your specific level, and which ones should you get? In this review, I take on a book that I suggest you do get - at least if you're at or near the beginning of your chess development. This was actually my first tactics book back in the day, and I recently reread it in order to give a proper review. I remember that I liked it the first time around and that my tactical skills improved. Although rereading it didn't contribute all that much to my learning, I still have a good impression of it. Please read on for more details. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from this book? Learn Chess Tactics is written by the one and only John Nunn, and (as the name implies) it is a tactics book. I would go as f

Understanding middlegames

Have you ever found yourself unable to find a move in the middlegame? Of course you have. We all have. About ten years ago, this was a recurring problem for me, which led to a lot of frustration. My conclusion was that I needed to learn how understand middlegames. So what better way than to read a book with the title Understanding Chess Middlegames ? Sound like the perfect remedy, right? Ok, let's find out. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron!   What can you expect from this book? I first read this book when I was just starting to study chess seriously. I bought it after reading a recommendation in an online forum. I would say this was ten years ago, but the book came out 2011, so it couldn't have been before that. Anyhow, my playing strength was probably around 1200 (I was unrated at the time) and I was having trouble choosing moves in non-tactical positions. Basically, I was playing without

Master of strategy

During the past two years, I’ve been working on improving my strategic/positional play. In this process, I have read a number of books, and two books that have long been on my reading list are the strategy books by Johan Hellsten. So when the Swedish chess federation requested reviewers for two of these books, I didn’t hesitate. I am happy that I was given the opportunity to review these books, and hope this review can be of help to you as a reader. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from these books? Johan Hellsten has created a name for himself as one of the leading experts of chess strategy in modern times. His series of strategy books ( Mastering Opening Strategy , Mastering Chess Strategy and Mastering Endgame Strategy ) have received glowing reviews from many parts of the chess world. So it feels good to finally dig into these nuggets. His endgame book is still in my boo