Skip to main content

David vs Goliath II

What is it that separates a grandmaster from an amateur player? This is a topic of several books, and it is also a question that I've asked myself. I have long been curious about what we can learn from grandmasters and what a patzer like me can implement in my own games in order to take at least a small step towards becoming a competent chess player. And the book under review here is one that promises to do just that. 

If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details.
Become a Patron!

What can you expect from this book?

Grandmaster versus Amateur is a book that I've had in my collection for several years. I bought it back in 2015 and started reading it immediately. For some reason, I only read the first two chapters and then I put the book away. I don't remember why. During my vacation this summer, I decided to pick it up again, and now I've finally read the entire thing.

The premise of the book is to discuss what happens when a grandmaster and an amateur meet to do battle over the board. On the back cover, the book promises to "explain the differences in thinking between professional and amateur chess players, and how the amateur can bridge the gap". As mentioned in the introduction, this is a similar approach to Chess Master vs Chess Amateur by Euwe and Meiden. Surprisingly, the authors were not aware of that book, which they comment in the preface:
It was only after the project was up and running that we were alerted to the existence of this book. To avoid ripping off the Dutch World Champion we deliberately avoided reading his book, instead preferring to do our own thing, and we hope the readers will agree when we say that the results are pleasing!
Although Aagaard and Shaw have their names on the cover, they are not the only authors. Both of them have contributed with their own chapters (Shaw has one, Aagaard has two). Other authors are Peter Heine Nielsen, Pavel Eljanov, Boris Avrukh, Tiger Hillarp Persson and Mihail Marin. All authors contribute with annotated games from their own careers along with some kind of narrative frame. 

The authors have all made their own interpretations of the topic of the book. In my personal opinion, this is the single most important determinant of the quality of the book. In other words, the quality of the chapters varies quite a bit. After my initial reading back in 2015, I got a very good impression of the book. I have forgotten most of the contents, but I remember that I enjoyed reading it. When I picked up the book again this summer, I got a very different impression. It felt like any old game collection. When I read the first two chapters again, I understood why; they are written in very different styles.

In the first and final chapters, Jacob Aagaard provides many good examples that resonate well with the overall idea of the book. He explains his thought process and extracts some general principles that the reader may use to beat stronger players:
  1. Play a good solid opening
  2. Play a lot of natural moves
  3. Be ready once you get your chance
The first two principles can be found in many chess books. The third one is based on the fact that even grandmasters are human, and they will make mistakes. What we see throughout the book is that the players who push the hardest eventually lose their games. So in order to win, you need to wait for a mistake and pounce. This seems to be a recurring lesson throughout the book.

In chapter 2, Peter Heine Nielsen continues in the same style. A very entertaining detail is that one of the games he presents is against Magnus Carlsen, with Carlsen in the role of the "amateur" (the game is from 2005 when he was "only" an IM).

The remaining chapters are less interesting, in my opinion. They contain interesting games, but they do not provide the same level of quality in annotations and details on thought process as in the chapters by Aagaard and Heine Nielsen. 

As usual, the publisher has provided an excerpt of the book. As indicated above, the featured example chapter 7 is not among my favorites, so if you like what you see, you will probably also enjoy the entire book. I really enjoyed the first two chapters, but I don't think that's enough for me to recommend the book. If you're looking for a book on masters versus amateurs, I suggest you instead take a look at Chess Master vs Chess Amateur by Euwe and Meiden.

Who should read this book?

As with many books from Quality Chess, this book is not aimed at beginners. But it is not as advanced as many of the other books in their catalogue. Being a game collection, it is fairly accessible, even for a a patzer such as myself. The first chapter has a lot of instructional value and is the highlight of the book. So if you stumble across the book, please read that chapter. But I do not recommend you to go out of your way to get this book.

About this book

Author:Jacob Aagaard & John Shaw (eds.)
Title:Grandmaster versus Amateur
Type of book:Game collection
Level:Intermediate, Advanced
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular reviews

Stop and reassess!

In my very first post on this blog, I reviewed The Amateur's Mind by Jeremy Silman. That was my first step to understand chess strategy. And I actually bought another one of Silman's book at the same time, but for some reason, it took me more than ten years to read. I finally decided to go through it and now I am ready to share my thoughts with you. (It feels like I've written this before.) If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from this book? Before writing this review, I had a few candidates. I am always reading several books in parallel, and I have a number that I'm about to finish. So I asked the Twitter community for input on which book they would like me to review as number 50. And this came out on top. So far I have reviewed 49 books on #patzersreview . Which one should be number 50? My candidates are: - Silman: Reassess your chess workbook - Nunn: Solving in...
Post a Comment
Read more

Judgement and planning

Some books "fly under the radar" and do not get the same attention as the evergreen classics. But sometimes, there is gold in old mines. And I found a little golden nugget while shopping for used books. A book written for amateurs, by (arguably) the best amateur of all time; former world champion Max Euwe. Sounds promising, right? If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from this book? In my previous review of Chess Fundamentals , said that few world champions have written books for beginners and intermediate players. Capablanca is, of course, one exception. And another is Max Euwe. Euwe is not the most well-known world champion. He was in his prime in the 1930s and 1940s, most notably in 1935 when he dethroned none other than the great Alexander Alekhine. Although many have suggested that Alekhine only lost because of heavy use of alcohol, beating him is no small feat (rega...
Post a Comment
Read more

My system should be your system?

One of the greates classics of chess literature. That's at least what it says on the cover. But let's not judge a book by the cover. Instead, we could listen to what others have said about this book. In his review of My system , John Watson writes: "We no longer consider many classics to be essential to a chess education, not since the Internet; but if there’s an exception, Nimzowitch’s work is it". These are big words from a big man. Watson is an authority of chess theory, so his evaluation should not be taken too lightly. Although My system has frequently been mentioned among the greatest books of all time, and has been recommended by many players , it has also been the subject of controversy. Of course, when the book was first published (almost 100 years ago), many ideas in the book challenged many of the established principles of chess theory at the time, and other authorities dismissed the ideas. But also to this day, many people are unimpressed with the b...
Post a Comment
Read more

Chess tactics for champions

Chess is 99% tactics. At least, that’s what some people say. Whether that is correct or not does not really matter, because either way you slice it, tactics is a central aspect of chess. Especially at the patzer level, games are often decided by a missed tactic. Working through a tactics book can extend your chess vocabulary and can be great for establishing and reinforcing patterns until they become a part of your chess intuition. So for a chess player, tactics training is like going to the gym. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from this book? As many readers probably know, Susan Polgar was born in Hungary and is currently living in the USA. Susan and her younger sisters Judit and Zsofia were all famously trained by their father László Polgár as an educational experiment as kids to become chess prodigies. And, the experiment was a success. Susan is the former women’s world ch...
1 comment
Read more

Learn chess tactics

Where should you turn for tactics training? This is a frequently occuring question, not only from beginners, but also from intermediate players. Which books are suitable for your specific level, and which ones should you get? In this review, I take on a book that I suggest you do get - at least if you're at or near the beginning of your chess development. This was actually my first tactics book back in the day, and I recently reread it in order to give a proper review. I remember that I liked it the first time around and that my tactical skills improved. Although rereading it didn't contribute all that much to my learning, I still have a good impression of it. Please read on for more details. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from this book? Learn Chess Tactics is written by the one and only John Nunn, and (as the name implies) it is a tactics book. I would go as f...
Post a Comment
Read more