David vs Goliath

What is it that separates chess masters from amateur players? That is a question that many people have asked. A simplistic answer is that the master is simply better at all parts of the game; openings, middlegame, endgame, calculation, tactics - you name it! On the other hand, this question has a quite complex answer. Former world champion, Max Euwe (together with Walter Meiden), has written a book that aims to illustrate the differences in how masters and amateurs approach the game. I have been curious about this book for a long time, and I have finally had the opportunity to read it and share my thougths on it with you.

If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details.
Become a Patron!

What can you expect from this book?

Chess master vs chess amateur is a book that for some reason does not get as much attention as other books. After reading it, I cannot see why. This is a book that has a lot to offer. It is full of practical tips for how to approach the game, and it is very well-written.

Before we get into the details of the book, let's begin with a description of its structure. And what better way to do that than through the authors' own words:

This book consists of a series of twenty-five games played between master and amateur. The early games of the book were played against beginners; later games, against coffeehouse players of various types; the last games against amateur book players.
Each game has been chosen to study certain aspects of chess.The introduction of the game lists the important points illustrated in the course of the game and discusses in detail one or two aspects of chess which are exemplified in the game.
As far as possible, the games are presented in order of their degree of amateurishness, but this order has occasionally been varied so as to present openings as a group or in some advantegous sequence. (p. xxix)

As indicated by the quote above, the games that are presented in order of "difficulty", beginning with quite elementary tactical mistakes and loss of tempo in the opening, progressing through more subtle positional details and the exploitation of weaknesses.

It is hard to imagine that this book is written by a world champion. Unlike many other books written by prominent grandmasters, this book has no examples whatsoever of "of-course-isms" (e.g. "Bh4 is of course bad in this position"). Rather, the reader is guided carefully through each example and each move.

The 25 games that are featured in the book seem to have been selected carefully in order to illustrate important principles and maximize the educational value. Here are some examples of principles and themes in the book:

The importance of time in the opening
Bringing the queen out too early
Central control - directly and indirectly
Passive play
Positional exchange sacrifice
Preventing castling
Using open files
Initiative
When to trade queens
Isolated pawns
Double pawns
The "Greek gift" sacrifice (Bxh7)
Focusing on a weak square

There are, of course, many other principles that are highlighted in the book, and all of them are explained through illustrative examples from complete games. There is even a little bit of opening theory for common openings, such as the queen's gambit and the Spanish/Ruy Lopez.

The book has a lot to offer in all parts of the game, but for the most part it highlights typical mistakes and misconceptions in the middlegame, which is why I have chosen to put it in the middlegame category as well as chess improvement.

The annotations are quite detailed and the main points are thoroughly explained. Overall, the content is presented in a very accessible and pedagogical way, which makes it very easy to follow the logic and extract the essence from each game.

Who should read this book?

One of the main chess book stores in Sweden describes this as a perfect continuation for players that have just passed the beginner stage and want to continue. I think this perfectly captures the spirit of the book. In my opinion, the book is very much readable for players who have come a bit further in their development. As stated above, it is very well-written and nicely presented, which makes it a delight to read. I would recommend it for all players up to about 1800 strength. Chess master vs chess amateur is a wonderful book in all aspects. So if you haven't already read it, I suggest you put it on your reading list. It will be well worth your time.

About this book

Author:	Max Euwe & Walter Meiden
Title:	Chess master vs chess amateur
Type of book:	Chess improvement, Middlegame
Level:	Beginner, Intermediate

Comments

Popular reviews

Under the surface

I did something different. I bought a chess book without doing any research. I decided to reward myself with a new book after having written ten reviews. So I asked my friends on Twitter for suggestions, and someone suggested that I take a look at the book Under the surface by Jan Markos. Since the book is quite new, I couldn't find much information about it, so I decided to blindly trust the recommendation. Luckily, I was not let down. What can you expect from this book? I am not the only one who has done something different. Jan Markos did the same when he wrote Under the surface . He takes a quite philosophical approach to chess, which should probably be expected from a former student of philosophy. This comes across quite clearly in his choice of chapter titles. The names "Magnetic Skin", "Anatoly Karpov's Billiard Balls" and "On the Breaking Ice" are not the most transparent chapter titles in the world. But once you get under the surfa...

Learn chess tactics

Where should you turn for tactics training? This is a frequently occuring question, not only from beginners, but also from intermediate players. Which books are suitable for your specific level, and which ones should you get? In this review, I take on a book that I suggest you do get - at least if you're at or near the beginning of your chess development. This was actually my first tactics book back in the day, and I recently reread it in order to give a proper review. I remember that I liked it the first time around and that my tactical skills improved. Although rereading it didn't contribute all that much to my learning, I still have a good impression of it. Please read on for more details. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from this book? Learn Chess Tactics is written by the one and only John Nunn, and (as the name implies) it is a tactics book. I would go as f...

Master of strategy

During the past two years, I’ve been working on improving my strategic/positional play. In this process, I have read a number of books, and two books that have long been on my reading list are the strategy books by Johan Hellsten. So when the Swedish chess federation requested reviewers for two of these books, I didn’t hesitate. I am happy that I was given the opportunity to review these books, and hope this review can be of help to you as a reader. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from these books? Johan Hellsten has created a name for himself as one of the leading experts of chess strategy in modern times. His series of strategy books ( Mastering Opening Strategy , Mastering Chess Strategy and Mastering Endgame Strategy ) have received glowing reviews from many parts of the chess world. So it feels good to finally dig into these nuggets. His endgame book is still in my boo...

The best book for patzers?

I have been playing chess since I was a kid, but until about 10 years ago (2009), I had not even considered reading chess books. For some reason, this changed. I cannot remember why, but I decided I wanted to learn more about chess and probably pick up a book or two. I searched the Internet and consulted a few online chess forums, and was recommended the book The Amateur's Mind by Jeremy Silman. I bought the book, and that was the start of my growing collection of chess books. The Amateur's Mind has had a tremendous impact on my understanding of the game. Prior to Reading this book, I had no idea about how to evaluate a position or how to play the opening properly (or any other phase of the game, for that matter). I saw my results improving dramatically, and gained a couple of hundred rating points in just a few months. At this point, I only played online, so I did not have a "proper" rating. But regardless, I learned a lot from reading the book. What can y...

Think first or think later? - part 1

This is a different kind of review. It's not just a review of one book, but two (actually three). Therefore, it's written in two parts, and this is part 1. I have chosen the book Move first, think later by Willy Hendriks and Understanding before moving by Herman Grooten (which is actually a series, with two books so far). The main reason I chose these books is that the titles indicate completely opposite views of how to approach chess: Think before you move or just move and think later. So how should a patzer like me make sense of this? I read the book on Forward Chess , which was a new experience for me. The service is available for various operative systems. I used the app on my iPad. One advantage is that it allows you to click through the variations instead of just visualizing them in your head. You can of course skip this, if you want to train your visualization skills. Another good thing is that you can try out various moves that are not in the book and switch on an ...

Patzer's review

Search This Blog