Skip to main content

Dynamize your chess

Some books are worth waiting for, and this one is exceptional in terms of waiting. When I ordered the book, it took over 6 months before it was delivered. When I finally got around to reading it, I realized that I should probably read more basic books on chess strategy in order to get more context on this one. So I put it away for a while. The result is that it has taken almost two years from when I ordered the book until this review was done. Is it worth the wait? Read on to find out.

If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details.
Become a Patron! 

What can you expect from this book?

In How to study chess on your own, Davorin Kuljasevic recommends that you should "dynamize" your tactical training. Dynamic chess strategy is a good book to get you started on that track. And it is also one of the books that Kuljasevic references repeatedly throughout his book. But what exactly does it mean? Well, that's one of the main questions that this book aims to answer.

In this book, the term dynamic is used to describe the mobility, or potential energy, of the pieces. Plainly put, this means putting the pieces on squares where they can "do" something. Dynamic chess is thereby a matter of maximizing the pieces' potential, and dynamic chess strategy is a general approach for playing in this way. Suba describes the aim of dynamic chess strategy as "promoting fighting and uncompromising chess" (p. 60). 

According to Suba, the discourse around chess strategy is biased towards static factors such as key files and squares, space, and "good" vs "bad" pieces. In his opinion, the dynamic elements of chess strategy has been neglected. And according to Suba, the most important element of chess strategy is mobility. (Side note: This is, in fact, the same message that Michael Stean gave in his book Simple ChessIt's nice to see that there is agreement between books written for beginners and for advanced players.)

An indication of this bias is the somewhat artificial distinction between strategy and tactics. With a dynamic perspective on chess strategy, this line is blurred. Tactics is an important part of dynamic play, and could thus be seen as a part of strategy. Or as Suba phrases it (p. 94):
Strategy is not the opposite of tactics, it is the theory of tactics. (...) It gives pointers for discovering plans, and plans, in their turn, direct the moves in given positions.
In practical terms, dynamic chess means that we aim for positions with elastic and non-symmetrical structures and central control. Because of the sharp positions that tend to arise in dynamic chess, evaluation of time is also very important. This is an example of how the distinction between strategy and tactics can be blurry.

Although Suba questions a lot of the traditional texts on chess strategy, he does not criticize the principles that are presented by authors such as Steinitz, Nimzowitsch and Watson. He emphasizes that these principles are still valid and an important part of chess strategy, but that dynamic elements need to be added to the mix. The table below gives a few examples of dynamic vs static elements of strategy.

Dynamic elements Static elements
Development Material
Activity
Structure
Concentration of pieces
Weaknesses

In How to reassess your chess, Silman has brought dynamics and statics together as one of several imbalances that need to be considered. This is one example of how the discussion of chess strategy has (hopefully) evolved since Suba first wrote this book.

Suba also argues that chess strategy can easily be perceived as something abstract and difficult to grasp. His opinion is that strategy must be made more practical and concrete (p. 63):
Chess strategy must lose some of its grandness, some of its sentential character, must come back to earth and become practical, so that we can make it work for us move by move.
Suba's suggestion for achieving this is to see strategy as a continuous process rather than some mystical concept that involves the unbroken execution of a deep plan that is laid before the game starts. Suba describes three major functions of chess strategy:
  1. Positional evaluation
  2. Understanding plans and "weapons"; your own and your opponent's
  3. Establish a plan
This is a quite advanced book. Although I enjoyed it, I feel that I probably did not understand all of it to the extent Suba had intended. In the foreword, he writes that the book is aimed at player rated 1900 or above, but that it could be relevant for somewhat lower rated players if they have sufficient "chess culture".

Dynamic chess strategy is not a very big book. It has 195 pages distributed over 7 chapters (plus one with solutions). The book contains a mix of stories, 36 annotated games and a lot of philosophical discussions about chess strategy. In my opinion, the latter is what makes this a great book. Personally, I found chapters 3 and 4 to be the most interesting parts. Don't get me wrong, the rest is also interesting, but not more than any average games collection.

If you are looking for more details on this book, please take a look at the sample pages from the publisher.

Who should read this book?

Dynamic chess strategy is a book for advanced players. Before reading it, you should have a strong foundation in chess strategy, and you have probably read quite a bit about the subject before. In terms of playing strength, you are probably well above 1800. So if you have a solid understanding of chess strategy, and you want to broaden your perspective on the subject, then this is an excellent book. For beginners, and intermediate players, I suggest you make a note of this book and pick it up once you reach the appropriate level.

About this book

Author:Mihai Suba
Title:Dynamic chess strategy
Type of book:Middlegame, Strategy
Level:Advanced

Comments

Popular reviews

Stop and reassess!

In my very first post on this blog, I reviewed The Amateur's Mind by Jeremy Silman. That was my first step to understand chess strategy. And I actually bought another one of Silman's book at the same time, but for some reason, it took me more than ten years to read. I finally decided to go through it and now I am ready to share my thoughts with you. (It feels like I've written this before.) If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from this book? Before writing this review, I had a few candidates. I am always reading several books in parallel, and I have a number that I'm about to finish. So I asked the Twitter community for input on which book they would like me to review as number 50. And this came out on top. So far I have reviewed 49 books on #patzersreview . Which one should be number 50? My candidates are: - Silman: Reassess your chess workbook - Nunn: Solving in...

Chess tactics for champions

Chess is 99% tactics. At least, that’s what some people say. Whether that is correct or not does not really matter, because either way you slice it, tactics is a central aspect of chess. Especially at the patzer level, games are often decided by a missed tactic. Working through a tactics book can extend your chess vocabulary and can be great for establishing and reinforcing patterns until they become a part of your chess intuition. So for a chess player, tactics training is like going to the gym. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from this book? As many readers probably know, Susan Polgar was born in Hungary and is currently living in the USA. Susan and her younger sisters Judit and Zsofia were all famously trained by their father László Polgár as an educational experiment as kids to become chess prodigies. And, the experiment was a success. Susan is the former women’s world ch...

Learn chess tactics

Where should you turn for tactics training? This is a frequently occuring question, not only from beginners, but also from intermediate players. Which books are suitable for your specific level, and which ones should you get? In this review, I take on a book that I suggest you do get - at least if you're at or near the beginning of your chess development. This was actually my first tactics book back in the day, and I recently reread it in order to give a proper review. I remember that I liked it the first time around and that my tactical skills improved. Although rereading it didn't contribute all that much to my learning, I still have a good impression of it. Please read on for more details. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from this book? Learn Chess Tactics is written by the one and only John Nunn, and (as the name implies) it is a tactics book. I would go as f...

My system should be your system?

One of the greates classics of chess literature. That's at least what it says on the cover. But let's not judge a book by the cover. Instead, we could listen to what others have said about this book. In his review of My system , John Watson writes: "We no longer consider many classics to be essential to a chess education, not since the Internet; but if there’s an exception, Nimzowitch’s work is it". These are big words from a big man. Watson is an authority of chess theory, so his evaluation should not be taken too lightly. Although My system has frequently been mentioned among the greatest books of all time, and has been recommended by many players , it has also been the subject of controversy. Of course, when the book was first published (almost 100 years ago), many ideas in the book challenged many of the established principles of chess theory at the time, and other authorities dismissed the ideas. But also to this day, many people are unimpressed with the b...

Judgement and planning

Some books "fly under the radar" and do not get the same attention as the evergreen classics. But sometimes, there is gold in old mines. And I found a little golden nugget while shopping for used books. A book written for amateurs, by (arguably) the best amateur of all time; former world champion Max Euwe. Sounds promising, right? If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from this book? In my previous review of Chess Fundamentals , said that few world champions have written books for beginners and intermediate players. Capablanca is, of course, one exception. And another is Max Euwe. Euwe is not the most well-known world champion. He was in his prime in the 1930s and 1940s, most notably in 1935 when he dethroned none other than the great Alexander Alekhine. Although many have suggested that Alekhine only lost because of heavy use of alcohol, beating him is no small feat (rega...