Skip to main content

Dynamize your chess

Some books are worth waiting for, and this one is exceptional in terms of waiting. When I ordered the book, it took over 6 months before it was delivered. When I finally got around to reading it, I realized that I should probably read more basic books on chess strategy in order to get more context on this one. So I put it away for a while. The result is that it has taken almost two years from when I ordered the book until this review was done. Is it worth the wait? Read on to find out.

If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details.
Become a Patron! 

What can you expect from this book?

In How to study chess on your own, Davorin Kuljasevic recommends that you should "dynamize" your tactical training. Dynamic chess strategy is a good book to get you started on that track. And it is also one of the books that Kuljasevic references repeatedly throughout his book. But what exactly does it mean? Well, that's one of the main questions that this book aims to answer.

In this book, the term dynamic is used to describe the mobility, or potential energy, of the pieces. Plainly put, this means putting the pieces on squares where they can "do" something. Dynamic chess is thereby a matter of maximizing the pieces' potential, and dynamic chess strategy is a general approach for playing in this way. Suba describes the aim of dynamic chess strategy as "promoting fighting and uncompromising chess" (p. 60). 

According to Suba, the discourse around chess strategy is biased towards static factors such as key files and squares, space, and "good" vs "bad" pieces. In his opinion, the dynamic elements of chess strategy has been neglected. And according to Suba, the most important element of chess strategy is mobility. (Side note: This is, in fact, the same message that Michael Stean gave in his book Simple ChessIt's nice to see that there is agreement between books written for beginners and for advanced players.)

An indication of this bias is the somewhat artificial distinction between strategy and tactics. With a dynamic perspective on chess strategy, this line is blurred. Tactics is an important part of dynamic play, and could thus be seen as a part of strategy. Or as Suba phrases it (p. 94):
Strategy is not the opposite of tactics, it is the theory of tactics. (...) It gives pointers for discovering plans, and plans, in their turn, direct the moves in given positions.
In practical terms, dynamic chess means that we aim for positions with elastic and non-symmetrical structures and central control. Because of the sharp positions that tend to arise in dynamic chess, evaluation of time is also very important. This is an example of how the distinction between strategy and tactics can be blurry.

Although Suba questions a lot of the traditional texts on chess strategy, he does not criticize the principles that are presented by authors such as Steinitz, Nimzowitsch and Watson. He emphasizes that these principles are still valid and an important part of chess strategy, but that dynamic elements need to be added to the mix. The table below gives a few examples of dynamic vs static elements of strategy.

Dynamic elements Static elements
Development Material
Activity
Structure
Concentration of pieces
Weaknesses

In How to reassess your chess, Silman has brought dynamics and statics together as one of several imbalances that need to be considered. This is one example of how the discussion of chess strategy has (hopefully) evolved since Suba first wrote this book.

Suba also argues that chess strategy can easily be perceived as something abstract and difficult to grasp. His opinion is that strategy must be made more practical and concrete (p. 63):
Chess strategy must lose some of its grandness, some of its sentential character, must come back to earth and become practical, so that we can make it work for us move by move.
Suba's suggestion for achieving this is to see strategy as a continuous process rather than some mystical concept that involves the unbroken execution of a deep plan that is laid before the game starts. Suba describes three major functions of chess strategy:
  1. Positional evaluation
  2. Understanding plans and "weapons"; your own and your opponent's
  3. Establish a plan
This is a quite advanced book. Although I enjoyed it, I feel that I probably did not understand all of it to the extent Suba had intended. In the foreword, he writes that the book is aimed at player rated 1900 or above, but that it could be relevant for somewhat lower rated players if they have sufficient "chess culture".

Dynamic chess strategy is not a very big book. It has 195 pages distributed over 7 chapters (plus one with solutions). The book contains a mix of stories, 36 annotated games and a lot of philosophical discussions about chess strategy. In my opinion, the latter is what makes this a great book. Personally, I found chapters 3 and 4 to be the most interesting parts. Don't get me wrong, the rest is also interesting, but not more than any average games collection.

If you are looking for more details on this book, please take a look at the sample pages from the publisher.

Who should read this book?

Dynamic chess strategy is a book for advanced players. Before reading it, you should have a strong foundation in chess strategy, and you have probably read quite a bit about the subject before. In terms of playing strength, you are probably well above 1800. So if you have a solid understanding of chess strategy, and you want to broaden your perspective on the subject, then this is an excellent book. For beginners, and intermediate players, I suggest you make a note of this book and pick it up once you reach the appropriate level.

About this book

Author:Mihai Suba
Title:Dynamic chess strategy
Type of book:Middlegame, Strategy
Level:Advanced

Comments

Popular reviews

Under the surface

I did something different. I bought a chess book without doing any research. I decided to reward myself with a new book after having written ten reviews. So I asked my friends on Twitter for suggestions, and someone suggested that I take a look at the book Under the surface by Jan Markos. Since the book is quite new, I couldn't find much information about it, so I decided to blindly trust the recommendation. Luckily, I was not let down. What can you expect from this book? I am not the only one who has done something different. Jan Markos did the same when he wrote Under the surface . He takes a quite philosophical approach to chess, which should probably be expected from a former student of philosophy. This comes across quite clearly in his choice of chapter titles. The names "Magnetic Skin", "Anatoly Karpov's Billiard Balls" and "On the Breaking Ice" are not the most transparent chapter titles in the world. But once you get under the surfa

Master of strategy

During the past two years, I’ve been working on improving my strategic/positional play. In this process, I have read a number of books, and two books that have long been on my reading list are the strategy books by Johan Hellsten. So when the Swedish chess federation requested reviewers for two of these books, I didn’t hesitate. I am happy that I was given the opportunity to review these books, and hope this review can be of help to you as a reader. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from these books? Johan Hellsten has created a name for himself as one of the leading experts of chess strategy in modern times. His series of strategy books ( Mastering Opening Strategy , Mastering Chess Strategy and Mastering Endgame Strategy ) have received glowing reviews from many parts of the chess world. So it feels good to finally dig into these nuggets. His endgame book is still in my boo

Understanding middlegames

Have you ever found yourself unable to find a move in the middlegame? Of course you have. We all have. About ten years ago, this was a recurring problem for me, which led to a lot of frustration. My conclusion was that I needed to learn how understand middlegames. So what better way than to read a book with the title Understanding Chess Middlegames ? Sound like the perfect remedy, right? Ok, let's find out. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron!   What can you expect from this book? I first read this book when I was just starting to study chess seriously. I bought it after reading a recommendation in an online forum. I would say this was ten years ago, but the book came out 2011, so it couldn't have been before that. Anyhow, my playing strength was probably around 1200 (I was unrated at the time) and I was having trouble choosing moves in non-tactical positions. Basically, I was playing without

Judgement and planning

Some books "fly under the radar" and do not get the same attention as the evergreen classics. But sometimes, there is gold in old mines. And I found a little golden nugget while shopping for used books. A book written for amateurs, by (arguably) the best amateur of all time; former world champion Max Euwe. Sounds promising, right? If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from this book? In my previous review of Chess Fundamentals , said that few world champions have written books for beginners and intermediate players. Capablanca is, of course, one exception. And another is Max Euwe. Euwe is not the most well-known world champion. He was in his prime in the 1930s and 1940s, most notably in 1935 when he dethroned none other than the great Alexander Alekhine. Although many have suggested that Alekhine only lost because of heavy use of alcohol, beating him is no small feat (rega

Learn chess tactics

Where should you turn for tactics training? This is a frequently occuring question, not only from beginners, but also from intermediate players. Which books are suitable for your specific level, and which ones should you get? In this review, I take on a book that I suggest you do get - at least if you're at or near the beginning of your chess development. This was actually my first tactics book back in the day, and I recently reread it in order to give a proper review. I remember that I liked it the first time around and that my tactical skills improved. Although rereading it didn't contribute all that much to my learning, I still have a good impression of it. Please read on for more details. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from this book? Learn Chess Tactics is written by the one and only John Nunn, and (as the name implies) it is a tactics book. I would go as f