Skip to main content

All by myself

How do I study chess in the most effective way? This is a question most chess players ask themselves at some point. Once in a while there comes a book that promises to deliver the definitive answer. And just a few months ago, such a book came out; How to study chess on your own. With such a title, this is a book that I just had to read. Should you read it too? In order to answer that, I think you should read this review and figure it out for yourself.

If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details.
Become a Patron! 

What can you expect from this book?

Like many other books, the first time I heard about How to study chess on your own was on the perpetual chess podcast that featured an interview with author Davorin Kuljasevic. The interview made me curious about the book, so I decided to get it.

How to study chess on your own is a big book. It has 380 pages that spans 9 chapters (plus solutions), 71 annotated games and 34 tests of different kinds. As is customary for new books, the publisher has provided some sample pages where you will find the table of contents and a small taste to give you an impression of the book.

According to Kuljasevic, the core of your chess studies should be analysis. He argues that you should analyze your own games carefully and list your mistakes.  This is an idea that is also recommended by Axel Smith in his book Pump up your rating. However, Kuljasevic goes a bit further and suggests that you can do the same with other people's games. For instance, you could look up a few of Alekhine's games and analyze them on your own, and then compare your analyses to what Alekhine writes in his collection of best games.

Based on the mistakes that you find (in your playing and/or your analytical work), you should identify the areas of your game that are in need of improvement, and this should be the basis for your study plan. For instance, if you find that your calculation is off, you should do some calculation/visualization training. Or if you make tactical mistakes, focus on tactics. For me, personally, the main problem is positional evaluation.

For most club players, we will identify mistakes in all parts of the game. This means that the list of areas that need improvement will be quite long.  As I discussed in my previous post on chess improvement, a study plan can cover all parts of the game (opening, middlegames, endgames, tactics, calculation, visualization etc.) or it can be focused on one or a few areas. As I indicate in that post, distributing your study time over all areas that require improvement will lead to a sort of Bilbo Baggins effect - "like butter scraped over too much bread". If you spend 30 minutes per week on a certain area, your improvements will probably not be very substantial. And this is where the usefulness of the book starts to decrease.

The study plans recommended in the book require about 30-40 hours per week. That's the equivalent of a full-time job. For mere mortals like us, for whom chess is a hobby, this is simply not realistic. He does address this fact, and suggests that if time is very restricted, you should stick to a more focused plan. The problem is that with such an approach, a large proportion of his advice will not be very relevant.

Kuljasevic defines five different categories in his book. 

Intermediate:1500-1800 Elo
Advanced:1800-2100 Elo
Improving youngster: 1900-2200 Elo
Master-level player:2100-2400 Elo
Strong titled player:2400+ Elo

Most of the advice in the book presumes that the reader is at the higher rating levels. So as a reader in the "intermediate" category, I felt a bit neglected at times. For instance, how realistic is it for a player at my level to study openings and trying to find novelties? Not very likely at all.

Despite the fact that I felt that the book wasn't written for me, there are a few suggestions that I take with me in my further chess studies:
  1. Create your own personal study plan based on your goals and improvement areas.
  2. Study openings deeply, all the way through the endgame. (Also recommended by JJ Lang)
  3. Gradually build your personal databases for each part of the game (openings, middlegames, endgames). Each database should include things like:
    • Themes
    • Interesting positions
    • Model games
  4. Don't study tactics only through puzzles. Also study dynamic play and learn how to generate tactical opportunities.
  5. Analyze games,  your own and other people's. Study critical moments and important variations, and conclude each line with an evaluation.
Richard James reviewed the book in British Chess News, and he essentially captured my impressions in the following quote:
There’s a lot of great – and highly instructive – chess in the book as well, so you might enjoy it for that alone. Much of it, though, I felt, was aimed more at the higher end of the rating scale. It would also be good to read a book on how to study chess written more for average players with limited study time.
This is a "talky" chess book, almost philosophical at times. Those who are familiar with my reviews will recognize that as the kind of book that appeals to me. And while I did enjoy it, I will not recommend it to everyone.

When I picked up this book, I hoped that it would provide the guidance that I need in my studies as an amateur player. But I realized that complex plans are probably only relevant for advanced players with high ambitions. So for the time being, I’ll stick to my own plan.

But it was an interesting read.

Who should read this book?

This book seems to be written with advanced players or very ambitious players in mind. The average patzer without ambitions of world domination will not get the most out of the book. If you're a regular person with other things to do, it can be an interesting read, but probably not the best use of your time. This being said, it is very insightful and good. So if you are a titled player aiming to improve further, or if you're up and coming and aiming for a title (FM or higher), this book will most likely be very useful.

About this book

Author:Davorin Kuljasevic
Title:How to study chess on your own
Type of book:Book review, Chess improvement
Level:Intermediate, Advanced
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular reviews

Judgement and planning

Some books "fly under the radar" and do not get the same attention as the evergreen classics. But sometimes, there is gold in old mines. And I found a little golden nugget while shopping for used books. A book written for amateurs, by (arguably) the best amateur of all time; former world champion Max Euwe. Sounds promising, right? If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from this book? In my previous review of Chess Fundamentals , said that few world champions have written books for beginners and intermediate players. Capablanca is, of course, one exception. And another is Max Euwe. Euwe is not the most well-known world champion. He was in his prime in the 1930s and 1940s, most notably in 1935 when he dethroned none other than the great Alexander Alekhine. Although many have suggested that Alekhine only lost because of heavy use of alcohol, beating him is no small feat (rega...
Post a Comment
Read more

Thoughts on chess improvement

I was recently interviewed by Kevin Scull  for his podcast  Chess Journeys: Tales of Adult Improvement . When I got the request, I started thinking about what I have to contribute with in terms of improvement advice for chess players. I ended up creating a mindmap of it all, and thought I would share it with you along with an elaboration of what it means. Three questions for you In my opinion, there are three main questions that you need to ask yourself in order to find your  path to chess improvement: Why am I doing this? What will I focus on? How will I study? I have tried (and failed) myself, many times. And what I've realized is that you cannot copy other people's plans for improvement; you need to create a personalized plan that is adapted to your goals, your needs and your general life situation. Don't copy other people's improvement plans Start with WHY I've seen a lot of adult players describe their chess goals. Almost all of them are defined in...
2 comments
Read more

Stop and reassess!

In my very first post on this blog, I reviewed The Amateur's Mind by Jeremy Silman. That was my first step to understand chess strategy. And I actually bought another one of Silman's book at the same time, but for some reason, it took me more than ten years to read. I finally decided to go through it and now I am ready to share my thoughts with you. (It feels like I've written this before.) If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from this book? Before writing this review, I had a few candidates. I am always reading several books in parallel, and I have a number that I'm about to finish. So I asked the Twitter community for input on which book they would like me to review as number 50. And this came out on top. So far I have reviewed 49 books on #patzersreview . Which one should be number 50? My candidates are: - Silman: Reassess your chess workbook - Nunn: Solving in...
Post a Comment
Read more

Lessons from a legend

What if you could get chess lessons from a former world champion? Would you say yes? This is a question that Kostya Kavutskiy asked in a recent video . I decided to accept that offer, and during the past few weeks, I've spent some quality time with the third world champion, José Capablanca. In his 100 year old book, he outlines some of the most important principles of chess. If you haven't already read this book, maybe you should? Hopefully, this review will help to decide if this book is for you. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron!   What can you expect from this book? Several world champions (most of them?) have written books for advanced players. Capablanca is one of the few who have written chess books for beginners and intermediate players. And his book Chess Fundamentals  is a classic introductory book. Many people have recommended it, and I've had it on my reading list for a long time...
Post a Comment
Read more

My system should be your system?

One of the greates classics of chess literature. That's at least what it says on the cover. But let's not judge a book by the cover. Instead, we could listen to what others have said about this book. In his review of My system , John Watson writes: "We no longer consider many classics to be essential to a chess education, not since the Internet; but if there’s an exception, Nimzowitch’s work is it". These are big words from a big man. Watson is an authority of chess theory, so his evaluation should not be taken too lightly. Although My system has frequently been mentioned among the greatest books of all time, and has been recommended by many players , it has also been the subject of controversy. Of course, when the book was first published (almost 100 years ago), many ideas in the book challenged many of the established principles of chess theory at the time, and other authorities dismissed the ideas. But also to this day, many people are unimpressed with the b...
Post a Comment
Read more