Skip to main content

Selling chess calculation

Chess calculation is a core skill in chess. Some say it's the most important skill, and that the ability to calculate deeply and accurately is the best predictor of playing strength. Thus, getting better at calculation should be a top priority for any improving player. So when I found the book Excelling at chess calculation, I felt that this should be a no-brainer. Let's take a look at this book!

What can you expect from this book?

Let me be upfront. When I was done reading this book, I was quite upset. The content does not fulfil the promise of the title - not even close. Upon writing this review, I went through the book again, just to check if I got a different impression. In one way, I didn't, but in another way I did. Let me explain.

"A crucial guide to the skill of chess calculation. Ideal for both club and tournament players." That's what the back cover says, and I had heard people recommending the book. My expectations were high and I was excited when the book arrived in the mail. Unfortunately, after getting halfway through the book, I came to the conclusion at least one of these statements is incorrect. As a club player, I felt that I did not learn much about chess calculation from this book. So either it's not for club players like me, or it simply isn't a guide to the skill of chess calculation. Either way, if you are a club player and want to develop your calculation, I would recommend other books.
It is important to develop our feeling for the critical moments in chess
The quote above is an example of the many truisms in the book. It is difficult to disagree with this statement. Another example is Aagaards answer to one of the most common questions from chess players: "How much should I calculate?" And his answer? "Not more than the position requires". Well, this would perhaps be a helpful comment if the reader was given some tools to determine the amount of calculation that is required by a given position. The same goes for developing a "feeling for the critical moments". But here, the book fails to deliver.

Each of the eight chapters in the book tease the reader into thinking that s/he will learn something profound about the topic that is indicated by the header, but after a page or so of general introduction, the realization slowly dawns that the promise will be left unfulfilled. For example chapter 8 is titled "How to train calculation" - arguably a central topic for this kind of book. The chapter outlines five main options: (1) Work out candidate moves, (2) do combinations, (3) work on pawn endgames, (4) solve studies and (5) analyze complicated positions. And that's about it! The chapters provides argumentation for why these types of exercises are useful, but gives little to no guidance for how to do them.

By now, my disappointment with this book should be all too clear. But I was not disappointed because it is a bad book. Rather, my objection is that it simply does not cover the topic of calculation training - at least not to the extent that one would expect. Instead, it is really a collection of annotated games. This being said, the annotations are great, and the games are interesting. So although the book does not fulfil its promise, it is still well worth reading.

Who should read this book?

As stated above, if you are looking to improve your calculation skills, this is probably not the best book for you. However, if you are looking for a book with interesting and well annotated games, this is an excellent choice. I believe that readers of all levels may get something out of the book, but the content is probably best suited for readers with a playing strength above 1700 Elo.

About this book

Author:Jacob Aagaard
Title:Excelling at chess calculation
Type of book:Game collection
Level:Intermediate/Advanced
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular reviews

Under the surface

I did something different. I bought a chess book without doing any research. I decided to reward myself with a new book after having written ten reviews. So I asked my friends on Twitter for suggestions, and someone suggested that I take a look at the book Under the surface by Jan Markos. Since the book is quite new, I couldn't find much information about it, so I decided to blindly trust the recommendation. Luckily, I was not let down. What can you expect from this book? I am not the only one who has done something different. Jan Markos did the same when he wrote Under the surface . He takes a quite philosophical approach to chess, which should probably be expected from a former student of philosophy. This comes across quite clearly in his choice of chapter titles. The names "Magnetic Skin", "Anatoly Karpov's Billiard Balls" and "On the Breaking Ice" are not the most transparent chapter titles in the world. But once you get under the surfa...
Post a Comment
Read more

Learn chess tactics

Where should you turn for tactics training? This is a frequently occuring question, not only from beginners, but also from intermediate players. Which books are suitable for your specific level, and which ones should you get? In this review, I take on a book that I suggest you do get - at least if you're at or near the beginning of your chess development. This was actually my first tactics book back in the day, and I recently reread it in order to give a proper review. I remember that I liked it the first time around and that my tactical skills improved. Although rereading it didn't contribute all that much to my learning, I still have a good impression of it. Please read on for more details. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from this book? Learn Chess Tactics is written by the one and only John Nunn, and (as the name implies) it is a tactics book. I would go as f...
Post a Comment
Read more

Understanding middlegames

Have you ever found yourself unable to find a move in the middlegame? Of course you have. We all have. About ten years ago, this was a recurring problem for me, which led to a lot of frustration. My conclusion was that I needed to learn how understand middlegames. So what better way than to read a book with the title Understanding Chess Middlegames ? Sound like the perfect remedy, right? Ok, let's find out. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron!   What can you expect from this book? I first read this book when I was just starting to study chess seriously. I bought it after reading a recommendation in an online forum. I would say this was ten years ago, but the book came out 2011, so it couldn't have been before that. Anyhow, my playing strength was probably around 1200 (I was unrated at the time) and I was having trouble choosing moves in non-tactical positions. Basically, I was playing without ...
1 comment
Read more

Think like a Super-GM

In my previous review I mentioned how I would like to see an improved version of The Improving Chess Thinker , and that a book had recently come out that seemed to be perfectly in line with my ideas. A few months later, I have bought the book, worked through the exercises and read the prose. And finally, I am ready to give my complete review of the new book Think like a Super-GM . And I can tell you, I was not disappointed by this book. Read on to find out why you should probably get the book too. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from this book? As the title indicates, Think like a Super-GM is a book about thinking in chess. At its core, it is a puzzle book. But it is more than that. In the chapters surrounding the puzzles, the book digs into the challenges of thinking in chess and how the thinking process differs between players of different levels. The first chapter ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Estimating playing strength

Have you ever felt like your chess rating doesn't represent your actual playing strength? Sometimes we want to be able to estimate playing strength based on individual games rather than rating (which changes more slowly). During the past few months, I've been taking a number of online courses and learning python for data analysis. In one of the courses, the final project allowed me to choose my own dataset. So surprise surprise! I chose something chess related. (Not really surprised, are you?) When we play games online, getting a computer evaluation is just a few clicks away. And a commonly used statistic is the average centipawn loss, or simply the average deviation from the computer's best move. Many of us tend to think that centipawn loss (CPL) is a good estimate of playing strength. And, of course, it gives some indication, but it's far from a perfect predictor. Fellow chess/statistics blogger Patrick Coulombe has investigated the correlation between rating and CPL ...
Post a Comment
Read more