Skip to main content

Out of tune?

Have you ever missed a tactic in your games? Of course you have. We all have. Wouldn't it be good if someone wrote a book that could help you get better at spotting tactics? Well, there is such a book. Actually, there are many such books. And one example is Tune your chess tactics antenna by Emmanuel Neiman.

I'd like to warn sensitive readers, as this review may contain sarcasm. You have been warned.

What can you expect from this book?

As you probably know, there are hundreds and hundreds of tactics books out there, and most of them are pretty similar. Usually, a tactics book is divided into themes (pins, forks, skewers etc.), and the author explains each theme and then there are a bunch of puzzles for you to solve. Sound familiar?

In Tune your chess tactics antenna, you will find a similar component, but that is not all. In the first part of the book, the author presents seven signals that a tactic might be present.
  1. Weak king position
  2. Unprotected piece(s)
  3. Alignment (pieces on the same rank, file or diagonal)
  4. Knight fork distance
  5. Trapped piece(s)
  6. Crucial or overloaded defender
  7. Impotent defence, or defence too far away
So far, so good. A similar construct is presented by Dan Heisman in his Novice Nook article Seeds of tactical destruction (also found in A guide to chess improvement). Heisman gives a list that largely overlaps Neiman's seven signals: 
  1. Open enemy lines for Rooks, Queens, and Bishops to your King
  2. Loose (unguarded) pieces - "Loose Pieces Drop Off" = LPDO
  3. Pinned or "skewerable" pieces along the same rank, file, or diagonal
  4. Pieces (or squares) vulnerable to Knight forks
  5. Pieces that have little mobility and might easily be trapped if attacked
  6. Overworked pieces (pieces guarding more than one piece or square)
  7. A large domination of one side's forces in one area of the board
  8. Pieces that can easily be attacked by enemy pieces of less value
  9. One or more pieces than can be attacked via a "discovered attack"
  10. Weak back rank
  11. Inadequately guarded pieces
  12. Falling way behind in development (overwhelming opponent forces)
  13. Pawns nearing promotion
  14. King uncastled or lost pawn protection with Queens on the board

The fact that the two authors agree is a good sign. Points 1-7 are more or less the same as above, but Heisman's list goes on to mention seven additional points. He also says that it is possible to come up with even more. Although Heisman presents a more exhaustive list of "signals" or "seeds", I think that seven is a reasonable number for a book like this. It is difficult enough to remember all seven, not to mention 14 or more! So far, I like the book.

Another aspect of of the book that sets it apart from others on the market is that the examples and puzzles are presented in context. That is, the author presents the entire game up to the puzzle position, and the solution (for the most part) presents all the remaining moves. The rationale for this approach is "to get closer to the actual game situation" (p. 23). While this may be a good ambition, I doubt that very many readers will play through all the moves. One example gives 118 (!) moves before we arrive at the puzzle position. For the most part, this will not necessarily yield much more than simply studying the diagram. But for the ambitious reader, it may be a useful addition.

I have one major issue with this book. And it has to do with the pedagogical orientation. Some explanations are quite difficult to follow, such as the "swing door" tactic, which I will not even try to describe. Furthermore, I feel that the choice of examples/puzzles is quite off at times. For examples under the theme/signal knight fork distance, there are examples in which there is no knight fork! Wait, what? How does that help me understand the concept??

Also, some tactics are a bit over the top, and at least for me personally, the point is lost. Let me show one example. The theme here is weak king position.

White to move
The weak king position allows you to deflect a crucial defender (f6-knight) which allows a double bishop sacrifice that leads to mate - almost. The problem is the queen can interpose, leading to a position in which white is down a rook and two pieces for a queen. But there is a queen fork at the end, which wins a bishop. Basic stuff. The king position should tip you off, right? And now, of course, you see the whole solution. In case you don't, the whole line is presented below.

1. Nh5 Nxh5 2. Bxh7+ Kxh7 3. Qxh5+ Kg8 4. Bxg7 Kxg7 5. Qg4+ Kh7 6. Rf3 e5 7. Rh3+ Qh6 8. Rxh6+ Kxh6 9. Qd7

There are several examples like this in the book. To my mind, it is a rather unpedagogical way to present the ideas that the author wants to get across. Sure, these may be good exercises, but they are not the most illustrative examples.

My impression of the book is summarized quite well by a reviewer on Amazon: "It's a great idea: train your brain to recognize clues in chess positions that will alert you to various tactical possibilities. But I was very disappointed in the examples used. The tactical clues being illustrated are hidden so deep inside the games that they would never jump out at you. And there are other tactical signals hidden in the same games which aren't pointed out at all."

Another Amazon reviewer wrote: "The people who are giving this two stars either didn't read it right or are brain dead when it comes to chess."

I don't know which of these statements are true for me. Maybe I am braindead, but I definitely feel that this book does not quite deliver. The fundamental logic and ambition of the book is great, but the execution is off. I know that there are people out there that will disagree strongly, but I don't think it is a very good book. Something is out of tune, whether it is my reading/ability or the author's presentation of the material. As the guy said in the movie Notting Hill: There is something wrong with this yoghurt.

Who should read this book

Tune your chess tactics antenna is a book that is difficult to pin down in terms of intended audience. There is a wide range of tactics, from basic mating patterns to very advanced problems that are ten moves deep. Although this might indicate that the book is suitable for beginners (and up), I would say that it is in fact not. Sure, parts of the book are aimed at beginners, but for players at that level, there are far more suitable books out there. Instead, I would say that this is a book for fairly advanced players. In terms of rating, I would guess that you'd get the most out of the book if your playing strength is above 1700 Elo. But as indicated above, there are better tactics books out there.

About this book

Author:Emmanuel Neiman
Title:Tune your chess tactics antenna
Type of book:Tactics
Level:Intermediate/Advanced

Comments

Popular reviews

Judgement and planning

Some books "fly under the radar" and do not get the same attention as the evergreen classics. But sometimes, there is gold in old mines. And I found a little golden nugget while shopping for used books. A book written for amateurs, by (arguably) the best amateur of all time; former world champion Max Euwe. Sounds promising, right? If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from this book? In my previous review of Chess Fundamentals , said that few world champions have written books for beginners and intermediate players. Capablanca is, of course, one exception. And another is Max Euwe. Euwe is not the most well-known world champion. He was in his prime in the 1930s and 1940s, most notably in 1935 when he dethroned none other than the great Alexander Alekhine. Although many have suggested that Alekhine only lost because of heavy use of alcohol, beating him is no small feat (rega...

Nunn’s secrets

Let me tell you a secret. There is no such thing as 'the best chess books'. It all depends on the preferences and expectations of the reader and of course the work s/he puts in when working with the book. So just because someone else claims that a certain book belongs in the 'best books of all time' category, it does not necessarily mean that it is a book that you will appreciate. This little intro may have given away the content of this review, but that's ok. Secrets of practical chess is an example of a book that has gotten a lot of praise on a more than one occasion. So let's dig in and see what the fuss is all about. What can you expect from this book? Secrets of practical chess has seemingly been well received in the chess world. Overall, the opinions are very positive. John Watson gave it a very positive review , and Jacob Aagaard has listed it among the top 10 books of the 20th century . It is also mentioned in another list of 'best' books ....

Thoughts on chess improvement

I was recently interviewed by Kevin Scull  for his podcast  Chess Journeys: Tales of Adult Improvement . When I got the request, I started thinking about what I have to contribute with in terms of improvement advice for chess players. I ended up creating a mindmap of it all, and thought I would share it with you along with an elaboration of what it means. Three questions for you In my opinion, there are three main questions that you need to ask yourself in order to find your  path to chess improvement: Why am I doing this? What will I focus on? How will I study? I have tried (and failed) myself, many times. And what I've realized is that you cannot copy other people's plans for improvement; you need to create a personalized plan that is adapted to your goals, your needs and your general life situation. Don't copy other people's improvement plans Start with WHY I've seen a lot of adult players describe their chess goals. Almost all of them are defined in...

Lessons from a legend

What if you could get chess lessons from a former world champion? Would you say yes? This is a question that Kostya Kavutskiy asked in a recent video . I decided to accept that offer, and during the past few weeks, I've spent some quality time with the third world champion, José Capablanca. In his 100 year old book, he outlines some of the most important principles of chess. If you haven't already read this book, maybe you should? Hopefully, this review will help to decide if this book is for you. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron!   What can you expect from this book? Several world champions (most of them?) have written books for advanced players. Capablanca is one of the few who have written chess books for beginners and intermediate players. And his book Chess Fundamentals  is a classic introductory book. Many people have recommended it, and I've had it on my reading list for a long time...

My system should be your system?

One of the greates classics of chess literature. That's at least what it says on the cover. But let's not judge a book by the cover. Instead, we could listen to what others have said about this book. In his review of My system , John Watson writes: "We no longer consider many classics to be essential to a chess education, not since the Internet; but if there’s an exception, Nimzowitch’s work is it". These are big words from a big man. Watson is an authority of chess theory, so his evaluation should not be taken too lightly. Although My system has frequently been mentioned among the greatest books of all time, and has been recommended by many players , it has also been the subject of controversy. Of course, when the book was first published (almost 100 years ago), many ideas in the book challenged many of the established principles of chess theory at the time, and other authorities dismissed the ideas. But also to this day, many people are unimpressed with the b...