Skip to main content

1001 Checkmates

Modern Chess is too much concerned with things like Pawn structure. Forget it, Checkmate ends the game. This statement by Nigel Short may trigger different reactions in the chess experts of the world. Some may argue that it oversimplifies the game, since it is not possible to play for checkmate in all positions. On the other hand, it quite correctly pinpoints a major problem for beginning players in that they simply don't know how to end the game. I've seen this in our kids classes at my local club. The kids can be up a ton of material, but they don't know how to checkmate their opponent. A common piece of advice served to beginners is "do a lot of tactics". And I agree that this is a good idea. But I think we should expand on that advice and suggest that beginners (and stronger players) "do a lot of checkmates". And what better way to do this than go through a checkmate puzzle book?

If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details.
Become a Patron!

What can you expect from this book?

I don't remember where or when I first heard about this book, but it was probably highly recommended. So I bought it and put it in my bookshelf together with dozens of other books that I am planning to read. And it has probably been sitting there for several years. When planning a family trip over the holidays, I wanted to bring a book that I could probably finish over the two weeks we were going away. And the choice fell on John Nunn's 1001 Deadly Checkmates. So after all this time, sitting unread in my bookshelf, the book finally got to become a part of my chess training. 

1001 Deadly Checkmates is exactly what you'd expect from a puzzle book. As the title suggests, the book contains 1001 puzzles for you to solve. And the solution is always checkmate. If you simply find a way to win material, that is not the solution you should be looking for.

Each puzzle is assigned a certain amount of points, ranging from 1 to 5. The number of points reflects the difficulty of the puzzle, and you can note your score at the end of each chapter. 

When preparing this post, I found another review on a lichess blog. The lichess user Numerot has written a review in which he gives his opinion on this book. He summarizes the difficulty levels as follows:

1 — Entirely trivial, solved-at-a-glance puzzles.
2 — Fine pattern recognition building fodder.
3 — Just right: some difficulty solving, but usually fairly brisk solves.
4 — Very difficult; some I couldn't solve.
5 — Just barely solvable, many I couldn't solve.   

This rating will of course differ depending on your strength and tactical skills. Numerot seems to be a quite strong player, with ratings over 2000 in most time controls. His tactics rating is also quite high, just shy of 2300. If you are a beginner, you will probably not agree with his assessment of the difficulty.
My tactics rating is around the same level as his, and I agree with his assessment of the 1-point puzzles. But for me personally, I would categorize the rest as "pattern recognition building fodder" or "just right". When working through the book, I solved about 95 % of the puzzles correctly. 

I have used puzzles from this book when teaching kids at my club. I think their strenght corresponds to ratings around 800–1000, and the level seems just right for them. The one-pointers take them about 3 minutes to solve. They usually manage to solve the five-pointers if they work together; sometimes I need to give them a little hint.

The book has 17 chapters, of which the first 14 cover various themes, such as back-rank mates, queen sacrifices, pawn-promotion mates and so on. The remaining three chapters present mixed puzzles without a particular theme. Chapter 16 is called "Mate revision test" and gives you 60 puzzles you can use to test your skills. The final chapter ("Extreme mate challenge") has about 50 difficult puzzles, all of which are worth five points.

Although I had read recommendations of this book before picking it up, I hadn't looked into the target audience or level of difficulty. If I had done that, I would have found descriptions such as the following from the leading Swedish chess reseller Schackbutiken: 
When you have read your first beginners book on combination and want to move on, Nunn's 1001 Deadly Checkmates is a good choice.
If I had read this description, I would probably not have bought the book; simply because it is too easy for players at my level. But I am still glad I have read it, because it's a very good book, and drilling checkmate patterns – even if some are fairly simple – is a good way to strenghten your tactical vision. And I found a lot of good training material for my chess classes at the club.

My only quibble with this book is that I don't really see the point (pun intended) of the scoring system. Some books have a table that allows you to "translate" your scores to an approximate rating level. I haven't found anything like this in Nunn's book. But it doesn't really matter anyway. If you want to, I guess you could use the book to compete against your friends to see who can score the most points. But the points are probably most useful for indicating the level of difficulty of the puzzles.

Who should read this book?

This is an excellent book for beginners and post beginners who need to train their familiarity with tactics patterns. In terms of rating, I think it is best for players up to 1400. It can also be used by intermediate players who want to brush up on these skills, or strengthen their pattern recognition. But if you are stronger than 1700, this is probably not the best book for you.

About this book

Author:John Nunn
Title:1001 Deadly Checkmates
Type of book:Tactics
Level:Beginner
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular reviews

Under the surface

I did something different. I bought a chess book without doing any research. I decided to reward myself with a new book after having written ten reviews. So I asked my friends on Twitter for suggestions, and someone suggested that I take a look at the book Under the surface by Jan Markos. Since the book is quite new, I couldn't find much information about it, so I decided to blindly trust the recommendation. Luckily, I was not let down. What can you expect from this book? I am not the only one who has done something different. Jan Markos did the same when he wrote Under the surface . He takes a quite philosophical approach to chess, which should probably be expected from a former student of philosophy. This comes across quite clearly in his choice of chapter titles. The names "Magnetic Skin", "Anatoly Karpov's Billiard Balls" and "On the Breaking Ice" are not the most transparent chapter titles in the world. But once you get under the surfa...
Post a Comment
Read more

Learn chess tactics

Where should you turn for tactics training? This is a frequently occuring question, not only from beginners, but also from intermediate players. Which books are suitable for your specific level, and which ones should you get? In this review, I take on a book that I suggest you do get - at least if you're at or near the beginning of your chess development. This was actually my first tactics book back in the day, and I recently reread it in order to give a proper review. I remember that I liked it the first time around and that my tactical skills improved. Although rereading it didn't contribute all that much to my learning, I still have a good impression of it. Please read on for more details. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from this book? Learn Chess Tactics is written by the one and only John Nunn, and (as the name implies) it is a tactics book. I would go as f...
Post a Comment
Read more

Understanding middlegames

Have you ever found yourself unable to find a move in the middlegame? Of course you have. We all have. About ten years ago, this was a recurring problem for me, which led to a lot of frustration. My conclusion was that I needed to learn how understand middlegames. So what better way than to read a book with the title Understanding Chess Middlegames ? Sound like the perfect remedy, right? Ok, let's find out. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron!   What can you expect from this book? I first read this book when I was just starting to study chess seriously. I bought it after reading a recommendation in an online forum. I would say this was ten years ago, but the book came out 2011, so it couldn't have been before that. Anyhow, my playing strength was probably around 1200 (I was unrated at the time) and I was having trouble choosing moves in non-tactical positions. Basically, I was playing without ...
1 comment
Read more

Think like a Super-GM

In my previous review I mentioned how I would like to see an improved version of The Improving Chess Thinker , and that a book had recently come out that seemed to be perfectly in line with my ideas. A few months later, I have bought the book, worked through the exercises and read the prose. And finally, I am ready to give my complete review of the new book Think like a Super-GM . And I can tell you, I was not disappointed by this book. Read on to find out why you should probably get the book too. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from this book? As the title indicates, Think like a Super-GM is a book about thinking in chess. At its core, it is a puzzle book. But it is more than that. In the chapters surrounding the puzzles, the book digs into the challenges of thinking in chess and how the thinking process differs between players of different levels. The first chapter ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Estimating playing strength

Have you ever felt like your chess rating doesn't represent your actual playing strength? Sometimes we want to be able to estimate playing strength based on individual games rather than rating (which changes more slowly). During the past few months, I've been taking a number of online courses and learning python for data analysis. In one of the courses, the final project allowed me to choose my own dataset. So surprise surprise! I chose something chess related. (Not really surprised, are you?) When we play games online, getting a computer evaluation is just a few clicks away. And a commonly used statistic is the average centipawn loss, or simply the average deviation from the computer's best move. Many of us tend to think that centipawn loss (CPL) is a good estimate of playing strength. And, of course, it gives some indication, but it's far from a perfect predictor. Fellow chess/statistics blogger Patrick Coulombe has investigated the correlation between rating and CPL ...
Post a Comment
Read more