Skip to main content

1001 Checkmates

Modern Chess is too much concerned with things like Pawn structure. Forget it, Checkmate ends the game. This statement by Nigel Short may trigger different reactions in the chess experts of the world. Some may argue that it oversimplifies the game, since it is not possible to play for checkmate in all positions. On the other hand, it quite correctly pinpoints a major problem for beginning players in that they simply don't know how to end the game. I've seen this in our kids classes at my local club. The kids can be up a ton of material, but they don't know how to checkmate their opponent. A common piece of advice served to beginners is "do a lot of tactics". And I agree that this is a good idea. But I think we should expand on that advice and suggest that beginners (and stronger players) "do a lot of checkmates". And what better way to do this than go through a checkmate puzzle book?

If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details.
Become a Patron!

What can you expect from this book?

I don't remember where or when I first heard about this book, but it was probably highly recommended. So I bought it and put it in my bookshelf together with dozens of other books that I am planning to read. And it has probably been sitting there for several years. When planning a family trip over the holidays, I wanted to bring a book that I could probably finish over the two weeks we were going away. And the choice fell on John Nunn's 1001 Deadly Checkmates. So after all this time, sitting unread in my bookshelf, the book finally got to become a part of my chess training. 

1001 Deadly Checkmates is exactly what you'd expect from a puzzle book. As the title suggests, the book contains 1001 puzzles for you to solve. And the solution is always checkmate. If you simply find a way to win material, that is not the solution you should be looking for.

Each puzzle is assigned a certain amount of points, ranging from 1 to 5. The number of points reflects the difficulty of the puzzle, and you can note your score at the end of each chapter. 

When preparing this post, I found another review on a lichess blog. The lichess user Numerot has written a review in which he gives his opinion on this book. He summarizes the difficulty levels as follows:

1 — Entirely trivial, solved-at-a-glance puzzles.
2 — Fine pattern recognition building fodder.
3 — Just right: some difficulty solving, but usually fairly brisk solves.
4 — Very difficult; some I couldn't solve.
5 — Just barely solvable, many I couldn't solve.   

This rating will of course differ depending on your strength and tactical skills. Numerot seems to be a quite strong player, with ratings over 2000 in most time controls. His tactics rating is also quite high, just shy of 2300. If you are a beginner, you will probably not agree with his assessment of the difficulty.
My tactics rating is around the same level as his, and I agree with his assessment of the 1-point puzzles. But for me personally, I would categorize the rest as "pattern recognition building fodder" or "just right". When working through the book, I solved about 95 % of the puzzles correctly. 

I have used puzzles from this book when teaching kids at my club. I think their strenght corresponds to ratings around 800–1000, and the level seems just right for them. The one-pointers take them about 3 minutes to solve. They usually manage to solve the five-pointers if they work together; sometimes I need to give them a little hint.

The book has 17 chapters, of which the first 14 cover various themes, such as back-rank mates, queen sacrifices, pawn-promotion mates and so on. The remaining three chapters present mixed puzzles without a particular theme. Chapter 16 is called "Mate revision test" and gives you 60 puzzles you can use to test your skills. The final chapter ("Extreme mate challenge") has about 50 difficult puzzles, all of which are worth five points.

Although I had read recommendations of this book before picking it up, I hadn't looked into the target audience or level of difficulty. If I had done that, I would have found descriptions such as the following from the leading Swedish chess reseller Schackbutiken
When you have read your first beginners book on combination and want to move on, Nunn's 1001 Deadly Checkmates is a good choice.
If I had read this description, I would probably not have bought the book; simply because it is too easy for players at my level. But I am still glad I have read it, because it's a very good book, and drilling checkmate patterns – even if some are fairly simple – is a good way to strenghten your tactical vision. And I found a lot of good training material for my chess classes at the club.

My only quibble with this book is that I don't really see the point (pun intended) of the scoring system. Some books have a table that allows you to "translate" your scores to an approximate rating level. I haven't found anything like this in Nunn's book. But it doesn't really matter anyway. If you want to, I guess you could use the book to compete against your friends to see who can score the most points. But the points are probably most useful for indicating the level of difficulty of the puzzles.

Who should read this book?

This is an excellent book for beginners and post beginners who need to train their familiarity with tactics patterns. In terms of rating, I think it is best for players up to 1400. It can also be used by intermediate players who want to brush up on these skills, or strengthen their pattern recognition. But if you are stronger than 1700, this is probably not the best book for you.

About this book

Author:John Nunn
Title:1001 Deadly Checkmates
Type of book:Tactics
Level:Beginner

Comments

Popular reviews

Under the surface

I did something different. I bought a chess book without doing any research. I decided to reward myself with a new book after having written ten reviews. So I asked my friends on Twitter for suggestions, and someone suggested that I take a look at the book Under the surface by Jan Markos. Since the book is quite new, I couldn't find much information about it, so I decided to blindly trust the recommendation. Luckily, I was not let down. What can you expect from this book? I am not the only one who has done something different. Jan Markos did the same when he wrote Under the surface . He takes a quite philosophical approach to chess, which should probably be expected from a former student of philosophy. This comes across quite clearly in his choice of chapter titles. The names "Magnetic Skin", "Anatoly Karpov's Billiard Balls" and "On the Breaking Ice" are not the most transparent chapter titles in the world. But once you get under the surfa...

Learn chess tactics

Where should you turn for tactics training? This is a frequently occuring question, not only from beginners, but also from intermediate players. Which books are suitable for your specific level, and which ones should you get? In this review, I take on a book that I suggest you do get - at least if you're at or near the beginning of your chess development. This was actually my first tactics book back in the day, and I recently reread it in order to give a proper review. I remember that I liked it the first time around and that my tactical skills improved. Although rereading it didn't contribute all that much to my learning, I still have a good impression of it. Please read on for more details. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from this book? Learn Chess Tactics is written by the one and only John Nunn, and (as the name implies) it is a tactics book. I would go as f...

Master of strategy

During the past two years, I’ve been working on improving my strategic/positional play. In this process, I have read a number of books, and two books that have long been on my reading list are the strategy books by Johan Hellsten. So when the Swedish chess federation requested reviewers for two of these books, I didn’t hesitate. I am happy that I was given the opportunity to review these books, and hope this review can be of help to you as a reader. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from these books? Johan Hellsten has created a name for himself as one of the leading experts of chess strategy in modern times. His series of strategy books ( Mastering Opening Strategy , Mastering Chess Strategy and Mastering Endgame Strategy ) have received glowing reviews from many parts of the chess world. So it feels good to finally dig into these nuggets. His endgame book is still in my boo...

The best book for patzers?

I have been playing chess since I was a kid, but until about 10 years ago (2009), I had not even considered reading chess books. For some reason, this changed. I cannot remember why, but I decided I wanted to learn more about chess and probably pick up a book or two. I searched the Internet and consulted a few online chess forums, and was recommended the book The Amateur's Mind by Jeremy Silman. I bought the book, and that was the start of my growing collection of chess books. The Amateur's Mind has had a tremendous impact on my understanding of the game. Prior to Reading this book, I had no idea about how to evaluate a position or how to play the opening properly (or any other phase of the game, for that matter). I saw my results improving dramatically, and gained a couple of hundred rating points in just a few months. At this point, I only played online, so I did not have a "proper" rating. But regardless, I learned a lot from reading the book. What can y...

Think first or think later? - part 1

This is a different kind of review. It's not just a review of one book, but two (actually three). Therefore, it's written in two parts, and this is part 1. I have chosen the book Move first, think later by Willy Hendriks and Understanding before moving by Herman Grooten (which is actually a series, with two books so far). The main reason I chose these books is that the titles indicate completely opposite views of how to approach chess: Think before you move or just move and think later. So how should a patzer like me make sense of this? I read the book on Forward Chess , which was a new experience for me. The service is available for various operative systems. I used the app on my iPad. One advantage is that it allows you to click through the variations instead of just visualizing them in your head. You can of course skip this, if you want to train your visualization skills. Another good thing is that you can try out various moves that are not in the book and switch on an ...