Skip to main content

Learn from mistakes - part 2

Study your own games and learn from your mistakes! This is an age-old piece of advice that is thrown around in the chess community all the time. But how do you actually learn from your mistakes? This is a tricky question that rarely gets the same level of attention. So when you come across a book with the title Learn from your chess mistakes, it has to be a good sign - right? A friend of mine had this book in his collection and suggested I read it. It took me some time to get around to it, but finally I went through it. And let me just warn you at the get-go; this book has very little to do with your chess mistakes. But anywho, let's dive in!

If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details.
Become a Patron!

What can you expect from this book?

Chris Baker (author of this book) is a British IM, and as far as I can determine, this is the only chess book he's written. However, he is also the writer of the column "How bad is your chess?" in Chess Magazine, which seems to be a sort of inspiration for this book.

According to the back cover Learn from your chess mistakes aims to present typical mistakes of average players and help them identify and avoid these mistakes in future games. However, I am not entirely sure this statement is correct.

First of all, the book contains examples from master level games, and not your typical amateur player in the 1400-1800 range. This is a minor issue, as illustrative mistakes can be made at all levels. Instead, my main objections go directly to the core of the book: Learning from your mistakes. Does it help you do that? Instead of me telling you, let me give you a chapter-by-chapter summary so that you can make up your own mind.

The book has three "parts" which cover (1) openings, (2) middlegame and (3) endgames. These are in divided into sections that are numbered continuously throughout the book. This is a bit unconventional, but does not detract from the reading experience.

The openings part contains six subsections. These cover opening preparation, choice of openings, opponent's preparation, move orders and traspositions, and standard themes. Some key learning points from these sections are:
  1. Don't fall for traps!
  2. Don't get rigid. Try new ideas from time to time.
  3. Good preparation = deep preparation. Also: Don't forget your lines!
  4. Practice your openings in real games.
  5. Understand the theme of the opening and know more than your opponent!
  6. Try to predict what opening variation your oppenent is aiming for.
All of these points seem valid - at least for play at higher levels. However, I am having some difficulty seeing the relevance at lower levels. Also, I don't really see how all this relates to the topic of the book. Of course, you could turn everything around and say that there's a typical (?) mistake behind every point (e.g. failing to choose the right opening, not understanding the opening theme or forgetting lines). But even so, the book does not help you correct these mistakes.

Part 2 of the book is about the middlegame. This part also has six subsections, and these discuss problems related to losing the thread of the position, miscalculation, confidence (too much or too little), judgement, initiative, and missing opportunities. Here, I found what I think is the best piece of advice in the book (at least pertaining to the topic of learning from your mistakes). The following quote illustrates the point (p. 49):
Before you write off a mistake as just a tactical oversight, be sure that's what it really was. (...) Then try to root out the real cause of the defect in your position and correct it.
The remainder of the part (what's wrong with the term 'chapter'?) has some other learning points that may be more or less useful:
  1. Think in terms of concepts rather than heavy analysis.
  2. Check the position and do a new analysis every time your opponent has made a move. (Contradicts point 1?)
  3. Don't have too much or too little confidence! (Paging Goldilocks...)
  4. Be good at judging 'quiet' positions! (Easy peasy!)
  5. Try to gain/keep the initiative!
  6. Be mindful of critical moves. Don't miss your shot!
Once again, all of these point seem valid. But simply showing a few game examples does not help me as a reader improve any of this. Maybe I could improve my middle game judgement a tiny bit by studying the three games in section 10. But somehow I doubt that will suffice. Let me know if I am being overly critical here.

Finally, part 3 of the book is about the endgame. Unlike the first two, this part has only five subsections. The topics at hand are endgame technique, planning, spotting tricks, good and bad pieces, and control. Once again, we have some key learning points:
  1. Know your theoretical endgames!
  2. Be good at planning!
  3. Always look for tricks!
  4. Beware of good pieces turning bad!
  5. Control the game if you can!
The book ends with a puzzle section of sorts. The header is 'Spot the mistake'. Here, we are given ten positions and prompted to find the 'worst' move in each of them. The objective is not to find the absolute worst move, but rather a bad move that seems viable. Also, you should aim to find the correct move in each position. I found this a bit confusing and gave up after the first two. However, I found it amusing that you get a score from 1 to 100 on a 'Patzer Scale'. Bonus points for the name!

Although I have tried (not very hard) to stay relatively neutral in my presentation of the book, I think my sarcasm and disappointment in the book shines through. So as you probably have realized by now, this is not a book I would recommend as a resource for correcting your mistakes. However, the examples in the book are overall rather entertaining. Also, the games are well annotated and could definitely be used for learning purposes. But I think the book fails miserably in terms of its main objective.

Who should read this book?

As stated above, I wouldn't recommend this book to anyone. But the book happens to be available for whatever reason, you can definitely read it like any other game collection. But don't go out of your way to get it.

About this book

Author:Chris Baker
Title:Learn from your chess mistakes
Type of book:Game collection
Level:Beginner, Intermediate
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular reviews

Understanding middlegames

Have you ever found yourself unable to find a move in the middlegame? Of course you have. We all have. About ten years ago, this was a recurring problem for me, which led to a lot of frustration. My conclusion was that I needed to learn how understand middlegames. So what better way than to read a book with the title Understanding Chess Middlegames ? Sound like the perfect remedy, right? Ok, let's find out. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron!   What can you expect from this book? I first read this book when I was just starting to study chess seriously. I bought it after reading a recommendation in an online forum. I would say this was ten years ago, but the book came out 2011, so it couldn't have been before that. Anyhow, my playing strength was probably around 1200 (I was unrated at the time) and I was having trouble choosing moves in non-tactical positions. Basically, I was playing without ...
1 comment
Read more

Estimating playing strength

Have you ever felt like your chess rating doesn't represent your actual playing strength? Sometimes we want to be able to estimate playing strength based on individual games rather than rating (which changes more slowly). During the past few months, I've been taking a number of online courses and learning python for data analysis. In one of the courses, the final project allowed me to choose my own dataset. So surprise surprise! I chose something chess related. (Not really surprised, are you?) When we play games online, getting a computer evaluation is just a few clicks away. And a commonly used statistic is the average centipawn loss, or simply the average deviation from the computer's best move. Many of us tend to think that centipawn loss (CPL) is a good estimate of playing strength. And, of course, it gives some indication, but it's far from a perfect predictor. Fellow chess/statistics blogger Patrick Coulombe has investigated the correlation between rating and CPL ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Questions of modern chess theory

A Soviet classic - that's what it says on the front cover. And for good reason, I think. At the beginning of this year, I decided I would invest some time studying strategy books. I already had a number of them in my collection, and then I stumbled upon a thread in the facebook group ”chess book collectors”. The post contained some controversial claims about the book Question of modern chess theory , which was unfamiliar to me at the time. The post and the ensuing discussions piqued my interest, and I decided to check it out. After some research, I realized that this was a stepping stone for many other books, so I put it at the top of my reading list. I read it during the summer, but haven't got around to writing a review before now. So I actually had to read it again. Anywho, I am finally ready to share my thoughts with the world. Hope you enjoy it. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! Wha...
Post a Comment
Read more

Blindfold chess

Are you impressed by people who can play chess without seeing the board? For the uninitiated, this is a very impressive display of skill. But it is a skill that can be learned, and you don’t need to be a grandmaster to achieve it. The trick is to start small, with few pieces on the board - or in a diagram. In this review, I will discuss a book that can help you on the way to becoming a blindfold chess wiz.   If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from this book? A few years ago, my chess club arranged a small chess display in a local shopping centre. One of the things we did was having someone playing blindfolded against one of the spectators. People around the table were completely blown away by this, and many even asked if it was a trick. (It’s not!) Although blindfold chess seems amazing, even impossible, to some people, it is a skill that is very attainable. I would even c...
Post a Comment
Read more

Lessons with a Grandmaster

If you had actual lessons with a grandmaster, would you be brave enough to publish the transcripts? Well, someone did. And that someone wrote about it in book form — three books, to be precise. In this review, I present my thoughts on the first book in the book series Lessons with a Grandmaster . If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron!   What can you expect from this book? Lessons with a GM  is written in collaboration between Boris Gulko and Joel Sneed. Gulko is a grandmaster who emigrated from the Soviet Union in the 1980s. According to Wikipedia, he is the only player to win the Soviet as well as US Chess championships. Sneed is a professor of psychology at Queens College in New York as well as an amateur player.  In essence, this book is a game collection. There are 25 games in the book, all played by Gulko. There are some real heavyweights among his opponents, such as Kasparov, Karpov,...
Post a Comment
Read more