Skip to main content

Learn from mistakes - part 2

Study your own games and learn from your mistakes! This is an age-old piece of advice that is thrown around in the chess community all the time. But how do you actually learn from your mistakes? This is a tricky question that rarely gets the same level of attention. So when you come across a book with the title Learn from your chess mistakes, it has to be a good sign - right? A friend of mine had this book in his collection and suggested I read it. It took me some time to get around to it, but finally I went through it. And let me just warn you at the get-go; this book has very little to do with your chess mistakes. But anywho, let's dive in!

If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details.
Become a Patron!

What can you expect from this book?

Chris Baker (author of this book) is a British IM, and as far as I can determine, this is the only chess book he's written. However, he is also the writer of the column "How bad is your chess?" in Chess Magazine, which seems to be a sort of inspiration for this book.

According to the back cover Learn from your chess mistakes aims to present typical mistakes of average players and help them identify and avoid these mistakes in future games. However, I am not entirely sure this statement is correct.

First of all, the book contains examples from master level games, and not your typical amateur player in the 1400-1800 range. This is a minor issue, as illustrative mistakes can be made at all levels. Instead, my main objections go directly to the core of the book: Learning from your mistakes. Does it help you do that? Instead of me telling you, let me give you a chapter-by-chapter summary so that you can make up your own mind.

The book has three "parts" which cover (1) openings, (2) middlegame and (3) endgames. These are in divided into sections that are numbered continuously throughout the book. This is a bit unconventional, but does not detract from the reading experience.

The openings part contains six subsections. These cover opening preparation, choice of openings, opponent's preparation, move orders and traspositions, and standard themes. Some key learning points from these sections are:
  1. Don't fall for traps!
  2. Don't get rigid. Try new ideas from time to time.
  3. Good preparation = deep preparation. Also: Don't forget your lines!
  4. Practice your openings in real games.
  5. Understand the theme of the opening and know more than your opponent!
  6. Try to predict what opening variation your oppenent is aiming for.
All of these points seem valid - at least for play at higher levels. However, I am having some difficulty seeing the relevance at lower levels. Also, I don't really see how all this relates to the topic of the book. Of course, you could turn everything around and say that there's a typical (?) mistake behind every point (e.g. failing to choose the right opening, not understanding the opening theme or forgetting lines). But even so, the book does not help you correct these mistakes.

Part 2 of the book is about the middlegame. This part also has six subsections, and these discuss problems related to losing the thread of the position, miscalculation, confidence (too much or too little), judgement, initiative, and missing opportunities. Here, I found what I think is the best piece of advice in the book (at least pertaining to the topic of learning from your mistakes). The following quote illustrates the point (p. 49):
Before you write off a mistake as just a tactical oversight, be sure that's what it really was. (...) Then try to root out the real cause of the defect in your position and correct it.
The remainder of the part (what's wrong with the term 'chapter'?) has some other learning points that may be more or less useful:
  1. Think in terms of concepts rather than heavy analysis.
  2. Check the position and do a new analysis every time your opponent has made a move. (Contradicts point 1?)
  3. Don't have too much or too little confidence! (Paging Goldilocks...)
  4. Be good at judging 'quiet' positions! (Easy peasy!)
  5. Try to gain/keep the initiative!
  6. Be mindful of critical moves. Don't miss your shot!
Once again, all of these point seem valid. But simply showing a few game examples does not help me as a reader improve any of this. Maybe I could improve my middle game judgement a tiny bit by studying the three games in section 10. But somehow I doubt that will suffice. Let me know if I am being overly critical here.

Finally, part 3 of the book is about the endgame. Unlike the first two, this part has only five subsections. The topics at hand are endgame technique, planning, spotting tricks, good and bad pieces, and control. Once again, we have some key learning points:
  1. Know your theoretical endgames!
  2. Be good at planning!
  3. Always look for tricks!
  4. Beware of good pieces turning bad!
  5. Control the game if you can!
The book ends with a puzzle section of sorts. The header is 'Spot the mistake'. Here, we are given ten positions and prompted to find the 'worst' move in each of them. The objective is not to find the absolute worst move, but rather a bad move that seems viable. Also, you should aim to find the correct move in each position. I found this a bit confusing and gave up after the first two. However, I found it amusing that you get a score from 1 to 100 on a 'Patzer Scale'. Bonus points for the name!

Although I have tried (not very hard) to stay relatively neutral in my presentation of the book, I think my sarcasm and disappointment in the book shines through. So as you probably have realized by now, this is not a book I would recommend as a resource for correcting your mistakes. However, the examples in the book are overall rather entertaining. Also, the games are well annotated and could definitely be used for learning purposes. But I think the book fails miserably in terms of its main objective.

Who should read this book?

As stated above, I wouldn't recommend this book to anyone. But the book happens to be available for whatever reason, you can definitely read it like any other game collection. But don't go out of your way to get it.

About this book

Author:Chris Baker
Title:Learn from your chess mistakes
Type of book:Game collection
Level:Beginner, Intermediate
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular reviews

Under the surface

I did something different. I bought a chess book without doing any research. I decided to reward myself with a new book after having written ten reviews. So I asked my friends on Twitter for suggestions, and someone suggested that I take a look at the book Under the surface by Jan Markos. Since the book is quite new, I couldn't find much information about it, so I decided to blindly trust the recommendation. Luckily, I was not let down. What can you expect from this book? I am not the only one who has done something different. Jan Markos did the same when he wrote Under the surface . He takes a quite philosophical approach to chess, which should probably be expected from a former student of philosophy. This comes across quite clearly in his choice of chapter titles. The names "Magnetic Skin", "Anatoly Karpov's Billiard Balls" and "On the Breaking Ice" are not the most transparent chapter titles in the world. But once you get under the surfa...
Post a Comment
Read more

Learn chess tactics

Where should you turn for tactics training? This is a frequently occuring question, not only from beginners, but also from intermediate players. Which books are suitable for your specific level, and which ones should you get? In this review, I take on a book that I suggest you do get - at least if you're at or near the beginning of your chess development. This was actually my first tactics book back in the day, and I recently reread it in order to give a proper review. I remember that I liked it the first time around and that my tactical skills improved. Although rereading it didn't contribute all that much to my learning, I still have a good impression of it. Please read on for more details. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from this book? Learn Chess Tactics is written by the one and only John Nunn, and (as the name implies) it is a tactics book. I would go as f...
Post a Comment
Read more

Master of strategy

During the past two years, I’ve been working on improving my strategic/positional play. In this process, I have read a number of books, and two books that have long been on my reading list are the strategy books by Johan Hellsten. So when the Swedish chess federation requested reviewers for two of these books, I didn’t hesitate. I am happy that I was given the opportunity to review these books, and hope this review can be of help to you as a reader. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from these books? Johan Hellsten has created a name for himself as one of the leading experts of chess strategy in modern times. His series of strategy books ( Mastering Opening Strategy , Mastering Chess Strategy and Mastering Endgame Strategy ) have received glowing reviews from many parts of the chess world. So it feels good to finally dig into these nuggets. His endgame book is still in my boo...
Post a Comment
Read more

The best book for patzers?

I have been playing chess since I was a kid, but until about 10 years ago (2009), I had not even considered reading chess books. For some reason, this changed. I cannot remember why, but I decided I wanted to learn more about chess and probably pick up a book or two. I searched the Internet and consulted a few online chess forums, and was recommended the book The Amateur's Mind by Jeremy Silman. I bought the book, and that was the start of my growing collection of chess books. The Amateur's Mind has had a tremendous impact on my understanding of the game. Prior to Reading this book, I had no idea about how to evaluate a position or how to play the opening properly (or any other phase of the game, for that matter). I saw my results improving dramatically, and gained a couple of hundred rating points in just a few months. At this point, I only played online, so I did not have a "proper" rating. But regardless, I learned a lot from reading the book. What can y...
3 comments
Read more

Think first or think later? - part 1

This is a different kind of review. It's not just a review of one book, but two (actually three). Therefore, it's written in two parts, and this is part 1. I have chosen the book Move first, think later by Willy Hendriks and Understanding before moving by Herman Grooten (which is actually a series, with two books so far). The main reason I chose these books is that the titles indicate completely opposite views of how to approach chess: Think before you move or just move and think later. So how should a patzer like me make sense of this? I read the book on Forward Chess , which was a new experience for me. The service is available for various operative systems. I used the app on my iPad. One advantage is that it allows you to click through the variations instead of just visualizing them in your head. You can of course skip this, if you want to train your visualization skills. Another good thing is that you can try out various moves that are not in the book and switch on an ...
2 comments
Read more