Skip to main content

The match of all time

Fifty years have passed since the famous match that made Bobby Fischer the World Champion. Many books have been written about Firscher in general, and this match in particular. And recently, a new book was published in which one of the match organizers tells the inside story of the match and what happened behind the scenes, before, during and after the match. I was very excited to read this book, and I am ready to share my impressions with you.

If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details.
Become a Patron!

What can you expect from this book?

As mentioned above, The Match of All Time is a book about the World championship between Bobby Fischer and Boris Spassky in 1972. The match was played in Reykjavik, Iceland between July 11 and August 31. So this week, 50 years ago, Bobby Fischer became the 11th world chess champion.

The Match of All Time is written by Gudmundur Thorarinsson, who was the chairman of the Icelandic Chess Federation in 1972, and responsible for the team that was organizing the match between Fischer and Spassky. So he is in an excellent position to provide an inside account of the match.

The book has six chapters in all. The first chapter is a short introduction to the book itself. In chapter 2, Thorarinsson provides a short history of chess and its origins. And in chapter 3, we get a short presentation of the lives and careers of the official and unofficial world champions that came before Spassky, from the 1700s to the 1960s. While these chapters may be interesting for many readers, I do not really see their place in this book.

Chapter 4 is focused mainly on the events before the match. However, the chapter does only focus on the match itself, but also the candidates tournament. And we also get a more detailed presentation of the players (Fischer and Spassky). I find the structure of the chapter a bit confusing. It starts with a short presentation of the state of the chess world around 1970. We then get into a semi-detailed account of Fischer's participation in the candidates match, followed by a few pages on the bids for the world championship match. Only after all this do we get a presentation of the players. And then we return to the bidding process.

Chapter 5 is the main event of the book. This is where we learn about the match itself and all the drama that took place during and between the rounds. This is where most of the 'inside story' is told. Thorarinsson was in an excellent position to tell us about details that are likely unknown to the general public (I say likely because I do not have sufficient knowledge about what has been documented in other sources). Once again, the structure of the chapter is a bit confusing, jumping back and forth between various negotiations, letters from different people, match preparations, conditions and events surrounding the rounds. 

Chapter 6 concludes the book with a summary of the events that transpired after the match. The chapter gives a brief summary of how Fischer refused to defend his title against Karpov, the 1992 match against Spassky and Fischer's arrest and subsequent move to Iceland where he spent the rest of his life.

In my opinion, the author should have given more attention to the structure of the book. The lack of chronology is sometimes confusing, and there are examples stories and anecdotes that are presented several times and in slightly different versions. This detracts from the reading experience, and should have been weeded out during the editing process.

The match betwen Fischer and Spassky has been dubbed 'the match of the century', and not without reason. It's probably the most fascinating match in chess history, which is one of the reasons why Thorarinsson calls it 'the match of all time'. Overall, I think this is an interesting book, but I get the impression that 'the inside story' part of the book is rather limited. Most of the book covers topics that are well known, even to people who haven't studied the match in detail. 

I had big expectations on this book, but do not feel that it delivered. Perhaps my expectations were unrealistic, I don't know. But you should know that this is the first book I read about the match, so for readers who are well versed in the history and details of this famous match, you may assess the book differently. So if you're curious, read the book and find out for yourself.

Who should read this book?

Unlike many chess books, this book does not require any particular knowledge of chess. It's simply a story of the famous world championship match of 1972. My impression is that this book gives a good introduction to the events of the match, but if you are looking for the book on the match, this is probably not the book you're looking for.

About this book

Author:Gudmundur G. Thorarinsson
Title:The Match of All Time
Type of book:Biography
Level:Any

Comments

Popular reviews

Under the surface

I did something different. I bought a chess book without doing any research. I decided to reward myself with a new book after having written ten reviews. So I asked my friends on Twitter for suggestions, and someone suggested that I take a look at the book Under the surface by Jan Markos. Since the book is quite new, I couldn't find much information about it, so I decided to blindly trust the recommendation. Luckily, I was not let down. What can you expect from this book? I am not the only one who has done something different. Jan Markos did the same when he wrote Under the surface . He takes a quite philosophical approach to chess, which should probably be expected from a former student of philosophy. This comes across quite clearly in his choice of chapter titles. The names "Magnetic Skin", "Anatoly Karpov's Billiard Balls" and "On the Breaking Ice" are not the most transparent chapter titles in the world. But once you get under the surfa

Master of strategy

During the past two years, I’ve been working on improving my strategic/positional play. In this process, I have read a number of books, and two books that have long been on my reading list are the strategy books by Johan Hellsten. So when the Swedish chess federation requested reviewers for two of these books, I didn’t hesitate. I am happy that I was given the opportunity to review these books, and hope this review can be of help to you as a reader. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from these books? Johan Hellsten has created a name for himself as one of the leading experts of chess strategy in modern times. His series of strategy books ( Mastering Opening Strategy , Mastering Chess Strategy and Mastering Endgame Strategy ) have received glowing reviews from many parts of the chess world. So it feels good to finally dig into these nuggets. His endgame book is still in my boo

Understanding middlegames

Have you ever found yourself unable to find a move in the middlegame? Of course you have. We all have. About ten years ago, this was a recurring problem for me, which led to a lot of frustration. My conclusion was that I needed to learn how understand middlegames. So what better way than to read a book with the title Understanding Chess Middlegames ? Sound like the perfect remedy, right? Ok, let's find out. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron!   What can you expect from this book? I first read this book when I was just starting to study chess seriously. I bought it after reading a recommendation in an online forum. I would say this was ten years ago, but the book came out 2011, so it couldn't have been before that. Anyhow, my playing strength was probably around 1200 (I was unrated at the time) and I was having trouble choosing moves in non-tactical positions. Basically, I was playing without

Learn chess tactics

Where should you turn for tactics training? This is a frequently occuring question, not only from beginners, but also from intermediate players. Which books are suitable for your specific level, and which ones should you get? In this review, I take on a book that I suggest you do get - at least if you're at or near the beginning of your chess development. This was actually my first tactics book back in the day, and I recently reread it in order to give a proper review. I remember that I liked it the first time around and that my tactical skills improved. Although rereading it didn't contribute all that much to my learning, I still have a good impression of it. Please read on for more details. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from this book? Learn Chess Tactics is written by the one and only John Nunn, and (as the name implies) it is a tactics book. I would go as f

Judgement and planning

Some books "fly under the radar" and do not get the same attention as the evergreen classics. But sometimes, there is gold in old mines. And I found a little golden nugget while shopping for used books. A book written for amateurs, by (arguably) the best amateur of all time; former world champion Max Euwe. Sounds promising, right? If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from this book? In my previous review of Chess Fundamentals , said that few world champions have written books for beginners and intermediate players. Capablanca is, of course, one exception. And another is Max Euwe. Euwe is not the most well-known world champion. He was in his prime in the 1930s and 1940s, most notably in 1935 when he dethroned none other than the great Alexander Alekhine. Although many have suggested that Alekhine only lost because of heavy use of alcohol, beating him is no small feat (rega