Skip to main content

The match of all time

Fifty years have passed since the famous match that made Bobby Fischer the World Champion. Many books have been written about Firscher in general, and this match in particular. And recently, a new book was published in which one of the match organizers tells the inside story of the match and what happened behind the scenes, before, during and after the match. I was very excited to read this book, and I am ready to share my impressions with you.

If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details.
Become a Patron!

What can you expect from this book?

As mentioned above, The Match of All Time is a book about the World championship between Bobby Fischer and Boris Spassky in 1972. The match was played in Reykjavik, Iceland between July 11 and August 31. So this week, 50 years ago, Bobby Fischer became the 11th world chess champion.

The Match of All Time is written by Gudmundur Thorarinsson, who was the chairman of the Icelandic Chess Federation in 1972, and responsible for the team that was organizing the match between Fischer and Spassky. So he is in an excellent position to provide an inside account of the match.

The book has six chapters in all. The first chapter is a short introduction to the book itself. In chapter 2, Thorarinsson provides a short history of chess and its origins. And in chapter 3, we get a short presentation of the lives and careers of the official and unofficial world champions that came before Spassky, from the 1700s to the 1960s. While these chapters may be interesting for many readers, I do not really see their place in this book.

Chapter 4 is focused mainly on the events before the match. However, the chapter does only focus on the match itself, but also the candidates tournament. And we also get a more detailed presentation of the players (Fischer and Spassky). I find the structure of the chapter a bit confusing. It starts with a short presentation of the state of the chess world around 1970. We then get into a semi-detailed account of Fischer's participation in the candidates match, followed by a few pages on the bids for the world championship match. Only after all this do we get a presentation of the players. And then we return to the bidding process.

Chapter 5 is the main event of the book. This is where we learn about the match itself and all the drama that took place during and between the rounds. This is where most of the 'inside story' is told. Thorarinsson was in an excellent position to tell us about details that are likely unknown to the general public (I say likely because I do not have sufficient knowledge about what has been documented in other sources). Once again, the structure of the chapter is a bit confusing, jumping back and forth between various negotiations, letters from different people, match preparations, conditions and events surrounding the rounds. 

Chapter 6 concludes the book with a summary of the events that transpired after the match. The chapter gives a brief summary of how Fischer refused to defend his title against Karpov, the 1992 match against Spassky and Fischer's arrest and subsequent move to Iceland where he spent the rest of his life.

In my opinion, the author should have given more attention to the structure of the book. The lack of chronology is sometimes confusing, and there are examples stories and anecdotes that are presented several times and in slightly different versions. This detracts from the reading experience, and should have been weeded out during the editing process.

The match betwen Fischer and Spassky has been dubbed 'the match of the century', and not without reason. It's probably the most fascinating match in chess history, which is one of the reasons why Thorarinsson calls it 'the match of all time'. Overall, I think this is an interesting book, but I get the impression that 'the inside story' part of the book is rather limited. Most of the book covers topics that are well known, even to people who haven't studied the match in detail. 

I had big expectations on this book, but do not feel that it delivered. Perhaps my expectations were unrealistic, I don't know. But you should know that this is the first book I read about the match, so for readers who are well versed in the history and details of this famous match, you may assess the book differently. So if you're curious, read the book and find out for yourself.

Who should read this book?

Unlike many chess books, this book does not require any particular knowledge of chess. It's simply a story of the famous world championship match of 1972. My impression is that this book gives a good introduction to the events of the match, but if you are looking for the book on the match, this is probably not the book you're looking for.

About this book

Author:Gudmundur G. Thorarinsson
Title:The Match of All Time
Type of book:Biography
Level:Any
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular reviews

Judgement and planning

Some books "fly under the radar" and do not get the same attention as the evergreen classics. But sometimes, there is gold in old mines. And I found a little golden nugget while shopping for used books. A book written for amateurs, by (arguably) the best amateur of all time; former world champion Max Euwe. Sounds promising, right? If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from this book? In my previous review of Chess Fundamentals , said that few world champions have written books for beginners and intermediate players. Capablanca is, of course, one exception. And another is Max Euwe. Euwe is not the most well-known world champion. He was in his prime in the 1930s and 1940s, most notably in 1935 when he dethroned none other than the great Alexander Alekhine. Although many have suggested that Alekhine only lost because of heavy use of alcohol, beating him is no small feat (rega...
Post a Comment
Read more

Nunn’s secrets

Let me tell you a secret. There is no such thing as 'the best chess books'. It all depends on the preferences and expectations of the reader and of course the work s/he puts in when working with the book. So just because someone else claims that a certain book belongs in the 'best books of all time' category, it does not necessarily mean that it is a book that you will appreciate. This little intro may have given away the content of this review, but that's ok. Secrets of practical chess is an example of a book that has gotten a lot of praise on a more than one occasion. So let's dig in and see what the fuss is all about. What can you expect from this book? Secrets of practical chess has seemingly been well received in the chess world. Overall, the opinions are very positive. John Watson gave it a very positive review , and Jacob Aagaard has listed it among the top 10 books of the 20th century . It is also mentioned in another list of 'best' books ....
Post a Comment
Read more

Thoughts on chess improvement

I was recently interviewed by Kevin Scull  for his podcast  Chess Journeys: Tales of Adult Improvement . When I got the request, I started thinking about what I have to contribute with in terms of improvement advice for chess players. I ended up creating a mindmap of it all, and thought I would share it with you along with an elaboration of what it means. Three questions for you In my opinion, there are three main questions that you need to ask yourself in order to find your  path to chess improvement: Why am I doing this? What will I focus on? How will I study? I have tried (and failed) myself, many times. And what I've realized is that you cannot copy other people's plans for improvement; you need to create a personalized plan that is adapted to your goals, your needs and your general life situation. Don't copy other people's improvement plans Start with WHY I've seen a lot of adult players describe their chess goals. Almost all of them are defined in...
2 comments
Read more

Lessons from a legend

What if you could get chess lessons from a former world champion? Would you say yes? This is a question that Kostya Kavutskiy asked in a recent video . I decided to accept that offer, and during the past few weeks, I've spent some quality time with the third world champion, José Capablanca. In his 100 year old book, he outlines some of the most important principles of chess. If you haven't already read this book, maybe you should? Hopefully, this review will help to decide if this book is for you. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron!   What can you expect from this book? Several world champions (most of them?) have written books for advanced players. Capablanca is one of the few who have written chess books for beginners and intermediate players. And his book Chess Fundamentals  is a classic introductory book. Many people have recommended it, and I've had it on my reading list for a long time...
Post a Comment
Read more

My system should be your system?

One of the greates classics of chess literature. That's at least what it says on the cover. But let's not judge a book by the cover. Instead, we could listen to what others have said about this book. In his review of My system , John Watson writes: "We no longer consider many classics to be essential to a chess education, not since the Internet; but if there’s an exception, Nimzowitch’s work is it". These are big words from a big man. Watson is an authority of chess theory, so his evaluation should not be taken too lightly. Although My system has frequently been mentioned among the greatest books of all time, and has been recommended by many players , it has also been the subject of controversy. Of course, when the book was first published (almost 100 years ago), many ideas in the book challenged many of the established principles of chess theory at the time, and other authorities dismissed the ideas. But also to this day, many people are unimpressed with the b...
Post a Comment
Read more