Skip to main content

Amateurs at large

If you can't learn something from a game, you're doing something wrong. These are the words of adult improver extraordinaire Neal Bruce in an interview on Chess Dojo. For most people, learning from games means studying master games. But what about games played by amateurs? This review covers a book that aims to extract important lessons from amateur games.

If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details.
Become a Patron!

What can you expect from this book?

I first came across Dan Heisman's writing through his blog on chess.com. This must have been about 5 years ago. I was impressed by the large number of suggestions that are relevant for amateur players (patzers like us). And when I started to explore his bibliography, there was one book that quickly made it to my wishlist: The World's Most Instructive Amateur Game Book. (a.k.a the chess book with the longest title ever). And after several years, I finally got around to reading it.

The basic principle of the book is that you take a number of games played between amateurs and add some comments and suggestions from an instructor's perspective. Heisman highlights the mistakes that are made and aims to turn each of them into a small lesson that the reader (hopefully) will learn something from.

The book has five chapters with separate themes:
  1. Playing too fast
  2. Playing too slow
  3. Misplaying the endgame
  4. "Variety of instructive play"
  5. Decisive tactical mistakes
As usual, the publisher has put out an excerpt from the book, where you can see the table of contents (with proper chapter titles) along with a sample game.

This is a quite large book. It covers 30 games and has more than 300 pages. This means that each game is given about 10 pages on average, which is quite extensive. There are several reasons for the large number of pages per game.

The annotations obviously account for the majority of the contents, and they contain many different things. Obviously, the moves are presented along with the usual annotation symbols you would expect from any book (?? ! +- etc.) . You also get alternative lines for the substandard moves. Quite ordinary, so far. However, in addition to this, the time stamps from the games are included, which allows you to see how much time is spent for each move. Heisman uses this quite extensively, along with comments on whether or not the time management is reasonable. Spoiler alert: Usually it is not (which is indicated by the names of the two first chapters). Finally, the annotations also include computer evaluations and comments on the computer moves.

It seems that Heisman tries to cover it all in this book; openings, middlegames, endings, tactics, general principles etc. In my opinion, the combination of ordinary annotations along with comments on time management and computer evaluations makes it a bit too much. My impression is that the main message tends to be a bit muffled because of the large amount of information. Also, I feel that Heisman is a bit too heavy on the computer evaluations at times. In several games, he presents the computer's top moves without even attempting an explanation. I am having a hard time seeing the value of this.

This being said, the book has its fair share of upsides. You will find numerous examples of established principles and rules of thumb that can guide your decision making (but only in chess, not IRL). If you've read other publications by Heisman (books and articles), you'll probably recognize a great deal. The principles and recommendations are the same as you will find in his book A guide to chess improvement. What sets the game collection book apart from his other work is that you get a presentation of established principles (e.g. "move your rooks to open files") in a game context, and usually with a clear example of what happens when you don't follow said principles. The principles are often presented in italics or a grey text box, which makes them stick out from the rest of the text and thereby easy to find if you're just flipping through the pages or looking for something you've already read. Heisman also gives reading recommendations in conjunction with the game annotations, which can make it easier to find the books that correspond to your particular needs. For me, this is the main takeaway from the book.

Heisman has put up av youtube video where he goes through one of the games in the book. I think the video gives a fairly good idea about what the book is all about and how the games are presented. So if you like the video, you'll probably enjoy the book as well.

Who should read this book?

This is a book that is mainly geared towards beginners. It can also be useful for some intermediate players, if you want to sure up your foundation. In the video referenced above, Heisman says the book should be useful for players in the range 1100 to 2200. In my opinion, that may be a bit high. I think that most players rated 1800 and above will already be familiar with most of the stuff in the book.

About this book

Author:Dan Heisman
Title:The World's Most Instructive Amateur Game Book
Type of book:Chess improvement, Game collection
Level:Beginner/Intermediate
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular reviews

Judgement and planning

Some books "fly under the radar" and do not get the same attention as the evergreen classics. But sometimes, there is gold in old mines. And I found a little golden nugget while shopping for used books. A book written for amateurs, by (arguably) the best amateur of all time; former world champion Max Euwe. Sounds promising, right? If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from this book? In my previous review of Chess Fundamentals , said that few world champions have written books for beginners and intermediate players. Capablanca is, of course, one exception. And another is Max Euwe. Euwe is not the most well-known world champion. He was in his prime in the 1930s and 1940s, most notably in 1935 when he dethroned none other than the great Alexander Alekhine. Although many have suggested that Alekhine only lost because of heavy use of alcohol, beating him is no small feat (rega...
Post a Comment
Read more

Nunn’s secrets

Let me tell you a secret. There is no such thing as 'the best chess books'. It all depends on the preferences and expectations of the reader and of course the work s/he puts in when working with the book. So just because someone else claims that a certain book belongs in the 'best books of all time' category, it does not necessarily mean that it is a book that you will appreciate. This little intro may have given away the content of this review, but that's ok. Secrets of practical chess is an example of a book that has gotten a lot of praise on a more than one occasion. So let's dig in and see what the fuss is all about. What can you expect from this book? Secrets of practical chess has seemingly been well received in the chess world. Overall, the opinions are very positive. John Watson gave it a very positive review , and Jacob Aagaard has listed it among the top 10 books of the 20th century . It is also mentioned in another list of 'best' books ....
Post a Comment
Read more

Thoughts on chess improvement

I was recently interviewed by Kevin Scull  for his podcast  Chess Journeys: Tales of Adult Improvement . When I got the request, I started thinking about what I have to contribute with in terms of improvement advice for chess players. I ended up creating a mindmap of it all, and thought I would share it with you along with an elaboration of what it means. Three questions for you In my opinion, there are three main questions that you need to ask yourself in order to find your  path to chess improvement: Why am I doing this? What will I focus on? How will I study? I have tried (and failed) myself, many times. And what I've realized is that you cannot copy other people's plans for improvement; you need to create a personalized plan that is adapted to your goals, your needs and your general life situation. Don't copy other people's improvement plans Start with WHY I've seen a lot of adult players describe their chess goals. Almost all of them are defined in...
2 comments
Read more

Lessons from a legend

What if you could get chess lessons from a former world champion? Would you say yes? This is a question that Kostya Kavutskiy asked in a recent video . I decided to accept that offer, and during the past few weeks, I've spent some quality time with the third world champion, José Capablanca. In his 100 year old book, he outlines some of the most important principles of chess. If you haven't already read this book, maybe you should? Hopefully, this review will help to decide if this book is for you. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron!   What can you expect from this book? Several world champions (most of them?) have written books for advanced players. Capablanca is one of the few who have written chess books for beginners and intermediate players. And his book Chess Fundamentals  is a classic introductory book. Many people have recommended it, and I've had it on my reading list for a long time...
Post a Comment
Read more

My system should be your system?

One of the greates classics of chess literature. That's at least what it says on the cover. But let's not judge a book by the cover. Instead, we could listen to what others have said about this book. In his review of My system , John Watson writes: "We no longer consider many classics to be essential to a chess education, not since the Internet; but if there’s an exception, Nimzowitch’s work is it". These are big words from a big man. Watson is an authority of chess theory, so his evaluation should not be taken too lightly. Although My system has frequently been mentioned among the greatest books of all time, and has been recommended by many players , it has also been the subject of controversy. Of course, when the book was first published (almost 100 years ago), many ideas in the book challenged many of the established principles of chess theory at the time, and other authorities dismissed the ideas. But also to this day, many people are unimpressed with the b...
Post a Comment
Read more