Winning chess strategies

Chess strategy is one of the most elusive and difficult parts of chess. Compared to the direct and transparent world of chess tactics, strategy can be confusing and opaque. At the patzer level, tactical strikes that gain material or lead to checkmate can be obvious (provided that one understands the tactic). However, in many cases, strong players claim that a move is obvious although it doesn't result in material gain or even a semblance of an attack. We, the patzers of the world, scratch our heads and wonder how on earth anyone can find such moves obvious. How can we take steps towards this deeper level of chess understanding? Picking up a basic strategy book is a good first step. And that's what I did here.

If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details.
Become a Patron!

What can you expect from this book?

As a part of my ambition to deepen my understanding of chess strategy, I took on a mission of reading (and reviewing) some classics of chess strategy. Fellow chess enthusiast and Twitter personality Neal Bruce seems to be on a similar mission and has worked through many of the same books that I have in my collection. After his review and warm recommendations, I decided to take a closer look at Yasser Seirawan's Winning chess strategies. Anyone vaguely interested in chess books will sooner or later come across Yasser Seirawan and his "Winning chess" series. I have certainly known about the books for many years, but knew little to nothing about their contents. And to be honest, my decision to get this book was entirely based on Neal's recommendation. If he says it's the best basic strategy book, it has to be good. And that means I have to read it. That simple.

Neal has been on The perpetual chess podcast a few times, and during his latest visit, he and Ben did a recap of Winning chess strategies. If you are curious about the book, I suggest you take a listen do that episode.

Winning chess strategies is a part of a "starter pack" of chess books for patzers. It starts with the overall introduction Play winning chess and continues with six separate volumes on tactics, opening, strategies, endings, combinations and brilliancies. All of these books are fairly accessible and range about 250 pages.

When I dug into this book, the text felt very familiar. The content and the writing style has many similarities with one of my first chess books, and my very first review; The amateur's mind. There are several reasonable explanations for this. First of all, both are introductory books on chess strategy. Secondly, Seirawan shares Silman's humorous approach to writing. And finally (and possibly most importantly), Jeremy Silman co-authored this book. I have no idea much of the actual writing Silman has done in Winning chess strategies, but the text feels quite familiar to me.

The most apparent difference between Winning chess strategies and The amateur's mind is the number of pages. The latter is about 200 pages bigger, but both books cover more or less the same ground. The main difference is that The amateur's mind is largely aimed at the faulty thinking processes of amateur players, and provides many examples of how chess positions are evaluated by players at different levels. But in terms of pure chess strategy, the books are fairly similar. And both of them are excellent introductions to this difficult topic.

I was surprised that the publisher has not provided a preview of the book on their webpage. But, fortunately, this is available through Amazon. If you want to take a look at the contents of the book, you can find a preview and a number of reviews here.

Who should read this book?

If you are looking for a no-nonsense introduction to chess strategy, look no further. I think this is an excellent choice for several reasons. It is compact and to the point, it is well written, and examples are presented and explained in a direct and accessible manner. If you are fairly new to chess, or have had little or no formal chess training, this is an excellent starting point. Perhaps you are completely new to chess strategy, or a post-beginner with holes in your positional understanding. In terms of playing strength, I would expect your rating is below 1600 FIDE. If this sounds like you, I can warmly recommend this book.

About this book

Author:	Yasser Seirawan (and Jeremy Silman)
Title:	Winning chess strategies
Type of book:	Middlegame
Level:	Beginner/Intermediate

Comments

Popular reviews

Estimating playing strength

Have you ever felt like your chess rating doesn't represent your actual playing strength? Sometimes we want to be able to estimate playing strength based on individual games rather than rating (which changes more slowly). During the past few months, I've been taking a number of online courses and learning python for data analysis. In one of the courses, the final project allowed me to choose my own dataset. So surprise surprise! I chose something chess related. (Not really surprised, are you?) When we play games online, getting a computer evaluation is just a few clicks away. And a commonly used statistic is the average centipawn loss, or simply the average deviation from the computer's best move. Many of us tend to think that centipawn loss (CPL) is a good estimate of playing strength. And, of course, it gives some indication, but it's far from a perfect predictor. Fellow chess/statistics blogger Patrick Coulombe has investigated the correlation between rating and CPL ...

Rapid chess improvement

Would you like to gain 400 rating points in 400 days? That is what Michael de la Maza did. And he wrote a book about his progress and the methods that got him there. Quite an appealing idea, and many players at the beginner and intermediate level will be enticed. I was. Are you? In 2001, Michael de la Maza wrote an article in Chess horizons called "400 points in 400 days" . In the article, he outlines the main components of his training program and gives a short account of his own progress. He managed to to get from about 1300 to 2000 in just two years, which is quite an accomplishment. His ideas were later elaborated upon and presented in the book Rapid chess improvement. This book was published quite a few years ago, and can be difficult to find. But it has been republished in a new form, together with two other books in A chess course: from beginner to winner . If you decide you want to buy Rapid chess improvement , this three-in-one volume may be a good option. ...

Master of strategy

During the past two years, I’ve been working on improving my strategic/positional play. In this process, I have read a number of books, and two books that have long been on my reading list are the strategy books by Johan Hellsten. So when the Swedish chess federation requested reviewers for two of these books, I didn’t hesitate. I am happy that I was given the opportunity to review these books, and hope this review can be of help to you as a reader. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from these books? Johan Hellsten has created a name for himself as one of the leading experts of chess strategy in modern times. His series of strategy books ( Mastering Opening Strategy , Mastering Chess Strategy and Mastering Endgame Strategy ) have received glowing reviews from many parts of the chess world. So it feels good to finally dig into these nuggets. His endgame book is still in my boo...

Attack the king

One of the finest chess books ever written. Those are tall words from the back cover of this classic book. But The art of attack in chess is one of those books that keep popping up in lists of best chess books. It is highly regarded by many players and trainers, so the initial statement is probably not all wrong. This is a book that has been on my reading list for several years, but it has taken some time for me to actually pick it up. I've been curious about what the hype is all about, and now that I've finally found out for myself, I am ready to share that insight with you. So let's dive in! What can you expect from this book? Before we begin, let me just get one detail out of the way. One thing that struck me when I picked up the book is the title, which seems to be missing a "the". When reading about the book online, it is referred to both with and without "the". When I looked up the original book (this one is a revised edition, edited by Joh...

My system should be your system?

One of the greates classics of chess literature. That's at least what it says on the cover. But let's not judge a book by the cover. Instead, we could listen to what others have said about this book. In his review of My system , John Watson writes: "We no longer consider many classics to be essential to a chess education, not since the Internet; but if there’s an exception, Nimzowitch’s work is it". These are big words from a big man. Watson is an authority of chess theory, so his evaluation should not be taken too lightly. Although My system has frequently been mentioned among the greatest books of all time, and has been recommended by many players , it has also been the subject of controversy. Of course, when the book was first published (almost 100 years ago), many ideas in the book challenged many of the established principles of chess theory at the time, and other authorities dismissed the ideas. But also to this day, many people are unimpressed with the b...

Patzer's review

Search This Blog