Skip to main content

Let’s Go!

Now it's time for something completely different. As you probably know, I usually review chess books. But during summer I have spent some time reading my first ever books on the game of Go. So I would like to share some thoughts on that with you.

If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details.
Become a Patron!

What can you expect from these books?

I first came across Go about ten years ago, when a friend of mine introduced me to the game. He was also fairly new to the game, but he kicked my behind every time we played. So I don't consider myself to be very talented, but I was still very fascinated by the game. And the fact that I took such a beating from my friend is something that has stuck with me over the years and made me curious about what it is I need to learn in order to play the game at a half decent level. And finally, I decided to take a look at some basic books on the topic.

After a quick search on the web, I found several recommendations of the book Go - a complete introduction to the game and a series of books called Graded Go problems for beginners. The latter is a series of four volumes that range from basic through intermediate to advanced, and I have worked through the first volume.

Some people refer to Go as a Chinese (or Japanese) version of chess. This is a gross simplification. There are some similarities between the games, but the differences are considerable. Cho Chikun writes about this in the introduction to his book:

Both require high-level strategic thinking and provide players with many opportunities to exercise their tactical skills. Both are challenging, intellectually stimulating, and inexhaustibly interesting for millions of people of all ages all over the world. But the similarities end there. 
    Go starts with an empty board, chess with a full one. The objective of go is to surround more territory than your opponent; the objective of chess, to capture your opponent's king. Go stones all have the same value; chessmen have different values. (...) Most, if not all, of the moves of a go game remain on the board until it ends, providing its players with continuously developing shapes and patterns of black and white stones. (pp. 1-2)

As the quote above indicates, the objective of the game is to control as much territory as possible. It is also possible to capture the opponent's stones, but this is not the primary objective. This is something that I didn't understand when I first started playing; I tried to capture as many stones as possible - and lost. Furthermore, it is not always possible to logically deduce the best move. As in chess, there are of course certain tactical patterns and forced sequences. But in many cases, finding the best move is more about intuition and judgement rather than logic. This is perhaps one of the reasons why it has been difficult to develop Go software that can challenge professional players. (Until AlphaGo, that is) 

The two books that I have chosen for this review are a good combo for beginners. Although I did not know before I started reading, both books refer to one another, and suggest that they should be read in parallel.

Go - a complete introduction to the game by Cho Chikun is a textbook that provides explanations and descriptions of the fundamental concepts of the game. As the title indicates, it is a complete introduction - not only to the game itself, but also to the world of Go overall. The book has a rather interesting structure; every other chapter presents various techniques of game play, and every other chapter covers historical and cultural aspects of the game. This book covers everything that you need to know in order to play your first game. However, as in chess, it is a good idea to learn (and drill) some basic playing techniques and tactics. This is where the second book comes in.

Graded go problems for beginners can only be described as a basic tactics book. Here, you will also get an introduction to the game, albeit considerably shorter (only 10 pages). The main body of the book is exercises that will provide opportunities to practice basic techniques, tactics and calculation. The book has a total of 239 problems at the very basic level. Although I do not consider myself an able player, I managed to get most of them correct. So for any fairly experienced chess player who is getting into Go, it could be a good idea to get at least the first two volumes in the series.

Go has a ranking system that many will recognize from martial arts. Beginners have kyu ranks, ranging from high to low numbers. Advanced players have dan ranks (black belts in martial arts), ranging from 1 to 7 dan. And professionals have a separate set of dan ranks, from 1 to 9 dan.

After reading these books, I realized that the world of Go has a lot to offer. The literature seems to be just as vast as in chess, with game collections, opening theory, tactics and endgame books. It is also possible to play Go online, for instance on the Go KGS server. I gave this a try, and played a few games. I managed to beat a bot at the beginner level, so now I have a provisional rank of 24 kyu. It's not worth anything, but it's kinda cool.

Who should read these books?

These books are at the most fundamental level, so they are best suited for absolute beginners. The text book (Go - a complete introduction to the game) is a great introductory book. So if you want to know the basics of Go and what it is about, I can warmly recommend it. If you want to get a bit more practical (and serious?), I recommend getting the puzzle book as well. The first two volumes of the Graded go problems series are designed for players in the ranges 30 to 25 kyu and 25 to 12 kyu, respectively. My understanding is that the first book roughly corresponds to a 1200 playing strength in chess, which should be an achievable goal for someone who is completely new to the game. The second volume would be slightly more advanced, perhaps corresponding to a 1400 level. If you want to become a Go player, I suggest you get these first two volumes, maybe even all four. I plan to get the second volume soon. 

About these books

Authors:Cho Chikun
Kano Yoshinori
Titles:Go - a complete introduction to the game
Graded Go problems for beginners, vol 1
Type of book:Chess Go improvement, Tactics
Level:Beginner
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular reviews

Judgement and planning

Some books "fly under the radar" and do not get the same attention as the evergreen classics. But sometimes, there is gold in old mines. And I found a little golden nugget while shopping for used books. A book written for amateurs, by (arguably) the best amateur of all time; former world champion Max Euwe. Sounds promising, right? If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from this book? In my previous review of Chess Fundamentals , said that few world champions have written books for beginners and intermediate players. Capablanca is, of course, one exception. And another is Max Euwe. Euwe is not the most well-known world champion. He was in his prime in the 1930s and 1940s, most notably in 1935 when he dethroned none other than the great Alexander Alekhine. Although many have suggested that Alekhine only lost because of heavy use of alcohol, beating him is no small feat (rega...
Post a Comment
Read more

Nunn’s secrets

Let me tell you a secret. There is no such thing as 'the best chess books'. It all depends on the preferences and expectations of the reader and of course the work s/he puts in when working with the book. So just because someone else claims that a certain book belongs in the 'best books of all time' category, it does not necessarily mean that it is a book that you will appreciate. This little intro may have given away the content of this review, but that's ok. Secrets of practical chess is an example of a book that has gotten a lot of praise on a more than one occasion. So let's dig in and see what the fuss is all about. What can you expect from this book? Secrets of practical chess has seemingly been well received in the chess world. Overall, the opinions are very positive. John Watson gave it a very positive review , and Jacob Aagaard has listed it among the top 10 books of the 20th century . It is also mentioned in another list of 'best' books ....
Post a Comment
Read more

Understanding middlegames

Have you ever found yourself unable to find a move in the middlegame? Of course you have. We all have. About ten years ago, this was a recurring problem for me, which led to a lot of frustration. My conclusion was that I needed to learn how understand middlegames. So what better way than to read a book with the title Understanding Chess Middlegames ? Sound like the perfect remedy, right? Ok, let's find out. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron!   What can you expect from this book? I first read this book when I was just starting to study chess seriously. I bought it after reading a recommendation in an online forum. I would say this was ten years ago, but the book came out 2011, so it couldn't have been before that. Anyhow, my playing strength was probably around 1200 (I was unrated at the time) and I was having trouble choosing moves in non-tactical positions. Basically, I was playing without ...
1 comment
Read more

Estimating playing strength

Have you ever felt like your chess rating doesn't represent your actual playing strength? Sometimes we want to be able to estimate playing strength based on individual games rather than rating (which changes more slowly). During the past few months, I've been taking a number of online courses and learning python for data analysis. In one of the courses, the final project allowed me to choose my own dataset. So surprise surprise! I chose something chess related. (Not really surprised, are you?) When we play games online, getting a computer evaluation is just a few clicks away. And a commonly used statistic is the average centipawn loss, or simply the average deviation from the computer's best move. Many of us tend to think that centipawn loss (CPL) is a good estimate of playing strength. And, of course, it gives some indication, but it's far from a perfect predictor. Fellow chess/statistics blogger Patrick Coulombe has investigated the correlation between rating and CPL ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Thoughts on chess improvement

I was recently interviewed by Kevin Scull  for his podcast  Chess Journeys: Tales of Adult Improvement . When I got the request, I started thinking about what I have to contribute with in terms of improvement advice for chess players. I ended up creating a mindmap of it all, and thought I would share it with you along with an elaboration of what it means. Three questions for you In my opinion, there are three main questions that you need to ask yourself in order to find your  path to chess improvement: Why am I doing this? What will I focus on? How will I study? I have tried (and failed) myself, many times. And what I've realized is that you cannot copy other people's plans for improvement; you need to create a personalized plan that is adapted to your goals, your needs and your general life situation. Don't copy other people's improvement plans Start with WHY I've seen a lot of adult players describe their chess goals. Almost all of them are defined in...
2 comments
Read more