Skip to main content

The art of winning

A while back, I decided I would do a series of reviews of middle game books. Upon doing this, I realized that I simply had too few middle game books. So of course I had to expand my book collection (oh no!). One book that was missing from my collection was the classic The art of the middle game by Paul Keres and Alexander Kotov. So what better way to start this series of middle game book reviews than to discuss the art of the middle game, or as the Swedish title says: The art of winning in chess. Let's dive in!

If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details.
Become a Patron!

What can you expect from this book?

The art of the middle game was published in 1964, and is of course considered a classic of the middle game genre. I found a copy of the Swedish version on ebay, and decided to go with that. I was surprised to learn that this was published three years earlier, and that the English version was actually translated from Swedish.

One thing that separates the English edition from the "original" Swedish version, is that it has an additional chapter on planning, written by the translator, Harry Golombek. I haven't read it myself, but it is available via Google books.

Before going into the details of the book, I think it is important to give some context. At the time the book was written, there were not that many books on chess strategy and middle games. Most books were either opening theory or game collections. So Keres and Kotov were breaking some new ground and did not have a proper benchmark for this kind of book. If the book had been written today, it would probably have been very different.

The art of the middle game is a quite small book, both in terms of size (pocket format) and number of pages. The Swedish edition has just under 140 pages (excluding the foreword, table of contents etc.). So it would be naive to think that the book covers everything you need to know about middle games. Rather, it should be seen as an introduction to middle game analysis and strategic planning.

The book has four chapters that cover various middle game themes:
  1. Attacking the king (Kotov)
  2. Defending difficult positions (Keres)
  3. Central pawn formations (Kotov)
  4. The art of analysis (Keres)
Each chapter begins with a short presentation of the main principles that the authors want to focus on, and continues with a number of games to illustrate the main points. The games are well annotated and at times quite heavy on the analysis. This is especially the case in the final chapter. While the chapter title indicates that the theme is chess analysis in general, this is not the case. Rather, Keres focuses on the specific art of analyzing adjourned games. Of course, his approach can be applied to more general analysis, but that is not really the aim of the chapter. In Keres words:

"My examples above are not intended to provide any systematic guidelines for how to analyze an adjourned game. I have only wanted to demonstrate the work that awaits a chess master at home when his game has been adjourned."
(Swedish edition, p. 146, my translation)

In contrast to modern middle game books, the description of principles and methods are quite limited. The few principles that are mentioned will be well-known to most players beyond the basic level. Some examples: Attack if you have an advantage, play on the flanks if the center is closed, look for counterplay in worse positions. In other words, this should not be your go-to book for general advice on middle games.

The main selling point of the book is the analyses and annotations, and mainly the chapters by Keres. In his review of the book, Jeremy Silman mentions these two chapters as the reason that this book is a "must buy". Especially the final chapter has been lauded by several people, including translator/editor of the English edition Harry Golombek:

"It is the final chapter which I believe the reader will find most difficult to comprehend and yet most rewarding to study. It (...) reveals how a master's mind works and how a chess-player should set about the task of analysing any given position. (...) One can marvel at the collossal thoroughness with which Keres treats his analyses, without necessarily wishing to emulate him. And yet something of the spirit with which he approaches the game of chess will communicate itself to the reader if he is prepared to work through the examples with Keres as his guide."
(Editorial foreword, English edition, p. 10)

To summarize, this is not a book that you simply read and gather general advice. You can of course do that, but if you want to get something out of it, you should be prepared to play through the games and analyze alongside the authors. So perhaps it should be seen as a workbook rather than just a textbook.

Who should read this book?

This is a book for chess enthusiasts of all levels. The back cover of the Swedish edition states that the book can be read by anyone from beginners to elite players. Some parts are rather basic (e.g. chapter 1), and some parts are very advanced (e.g. chapter 4). But there is something for everyone here. If you are prepared to put in some work, you will surely be able to get something out of this book.

About this book

Author:Paul Keres & Alexander Kotov
Title:The art of the middle game (swe: Konsten att vinna i schack)
Type of book:Middlegame
Level:Any

Comments

Popular reviews

Lessons with a Grandmaster

If you had actual lessons with a grandmaster, would you be brave enough to publish the transcripts? Well, someone did. And that someone wrote about it in book form — three books, to be precise. In this review, I present my thoughts on the first book in the book series Lessons with a Grandmaster . If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron!   What can you expect from this book? Lessons with a GM  is written in collaboration between Boris Gulko and Joel Sneed. Gulko is a grandmaster who emigrated from the Soviet Union in the 1980s. According to Wikipedia, he is the only player to win the Soviet as well as US Chess championships. Sneed is a professor of psychology at Queens College in New York as well as an amateur player.  In essence, this book is a game collection. There are 25 games in the book, all played by Gulko. There are some real heavyweights among his opponents, such as Kasparov, Karpov,...

Master of strategy

During the past two years, I’ve been working on improving my strategic/positional play. In this process, I have read a number of books, and two books that have long been on my reading list are the strategy books by Johan Hellsten. So when the Swedish chess federation requested reviewers for two of these books, I didn’t hesitate. I am happy that I was given the opportunity to review these books, and hope this review can be of help to you as a reader. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from these books? Johan Hellsten has created a name for himself as one of the leading experts of chess strategy in modern times. His series of strategy books ( Mastering Opening Strategy , Mastering Chess Strategy and Mastering Endgame Strategy ) have received glowing reviews from many parts of the chess world. So it feels good to finally dig into these nuggets. His endgame book is still in my boo...

Think like a Super-GM

In my previous review I mentioned how I would like to see an improved version of The Improving Chess Thinker , and that a book had recently come out that seemed to be perfectly in line with my ideas. A few months later, I have bought the book, worked through the exercises and read the prose. And finally, I am ready to give my complete review of the new book Think like a Super-GM . And I can tell you, I was not disappointed by this book. Read on to find out why you should probably get the book too. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from this book? As the title indicates, Think like a Super-GM is a book about thinking in chess. At its core, it is a puzzle book. But it is more than that. In the chapters surrounding the puzzles, the book digs into the challenges of thinking in chess and how the thinking process differs between players of different levels. The first chapter ...

Chaos on the board

Have you ever felt tired of chess? Maybe you’ve been uninspired or perhaps you think it’s too much work. To paraphrase a famous movie: All work and no play makes you a dull person. If that is the case, I may have a cure. You need a fun chess book. Something that will rekindle your joy for the game and inspire you to play creatively. I give you Tiger’s Chaos Theory ! This book found me at a time when I needed it the most. My inspiration and motivation to study chess was way down. And like a bolt from the blue, the Swedish Chess Federation approached me and wanted me to review this book. And the kind people at Quality Chess agreed to send me a review copy. An offer I couldn't refuse. So after this happy turn of events, I have a new review for you. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from this book? Grandmaster Tiger Hillarp Persson, a multi-time Swedish chess champion, has al...

My system should be your system?

One of the greates classics of chess literature. That's at least what it says on the cover. But let's not judge a book by the cover. Instead, we could listen to what others have said about this book. In his review of My system , John Watson writes: "We no longer consider many classics to be essential to a chess education, not since the Internet; but if there’s an exception, Nimzowitch’s work is it". These are big words from a big man. Watson is an authority of chess theory, so his evaluation should not be taken too lightly. Although My system has frequently been mentioned among the greatest books of all time, and has been recommended by many players , it has also been the subject of controversy. Of course, when the book was first published (almost 100 years ago), many ideas in the book challenged many of the established principles of chess theory at the time, and other authorities dismissed the ideas. But also to this day, many people are unimpressed with the b...