Skip to main content

Disaster strikes

Chess can be brutal. It seems that at any given moment your position can go from playable (or even winning) to completely lost. I am sure it hasn't happened to you, but I have certainly found myself in this uncomfortable situation many times. Even the most experienced players fall victim to this every now and then. This is but a small consolation for the suffering amateur. But the true upside is that there is something to be learned here. This is especially true when a player loses right out of the opening due to an incorrect plan or other mistakes. Danish/American trainer and author Carsten Hansen has collected a number of games in this category and put them together in no less than ten books. I have had the opportunity to read one of them and would like to share my thoughts on it with you.

What can you expect from this book?

A chess miniature is a chess game that ends quickly. This is perhaps a somewhat simplistic definition, but it is probably as close to a "true" definition as one can come. The exact number of moves and nature of the game is subject to discussion. Some books set a limit around 20-25 moves. However, in Carsten Hansen's ten volume series on catastrophes and tactics in the opening, the games are very short (as indicated by the title) - 15 moves or less! Interestingly, the games are all at master level, which means the mistakes are far from trivial.

Now, you may think that these are only run-of-the-mill masters that nobody has heard of, but that is not the case. Among the victims, you will find some of the most prominent heavyweights of the chessboard, such as Yasser Seirawan, Alexei Shirov, Jacob Aagaard, and the World champion's wingman Peter Heine Nielsen. So if they play the occasional blunder, we shouldn't feel too bad about our own.

Hansen has collected a large number of games based on these criteria, sorted them by opening and published nine different books. Wait, the introduction says ten books, and now it's nine? Yes and no. The nine first volumes contains miniature games played in the same "families" of openings.
  • Vol 1: Indian defenses
  • Vol 2: 1.d4 d5 openings
  • Vol 3: Flank openings
  • Vol 4: Dutch, Benonis & d-pawn "specials"
  • Vol 5: Anti-Sicilians
  • Vol 6: Open Sicilians
  • Vol 7: Minor Semi-Open Games
  • Vol 8: 1.e4 e5
  • Vol 9: Caro-Kann & French
The tenth and final volume contains selected games from the original nine, and is thereby a sort of best of the best (or worst?) from the original nine volumes. What I like about this book is that it is a sort of "teaser" for the other books, giving the reader a small taste of what the contents of the first nine volumes. This is in fact exactly how Hansen presents the book in the introduction:
This book is a representation of the previous nine volumes, picking something of the best from each chapter in the preceding volumes, to give you an opportunity to look through the window and see if those other books are something for you.
The selection of games in this volume has its advantages and disadvantages. On the plus side, the large variety of openings gives the reader a lot of different examples of how things can go wrong in the early stages of the game. However, to paraphrase Bilbo Baggins, this variety of openings can feel like butter scraped over too much bread. The reader will get a lot of examples from different openings, but will not get an overview of the most common mistakes in specific openings. Luckily there is a remedy, namely the original nine volumes. So, for instance, if you are a Sicilian player - go get volume 6 and possibly even number 5. Then you will have a ton of examples from "your" openings and probably get a better understanding of the mistakes and traps to avoid.

As you may have realized from my previous reviews, I prefer chess books that contain a fair bit of prose. I find it much more interesting and entertaining to read the author's thoughts about the game as a whole as well as individual moves. For a patzer like myself, a bit of explanation is usually necessary in order to get a full grasp of the intricacies of the game at hand.

In this particular book (and most likely the rest of the books in the series), the prose is quite scarce. Usually, Hansen provides some comments at the critical points of each game, but apart from that he mostly just gives variations. In some cases, there are even multiple variations that can also be quite long. This will be a big plus for some readers, but personally, I like it when the author serves me the best bits on a platter. (Ok, I'm lazy. There, I said it!)

You can read more about Carsten Hansen and his books on his website. There, you can also register to get a free copy (e-book) of the first volume of the "catastrophe and tactics" series. So this may be a good option if you want to form your own opinion about these books.

Who should read this book?

Miniature games is often presented as a good option for beginners to study chess. In many cases, this may be true, but in this particular case, I think that the games are a bit too advanced and the explanations too limited for beginners. Therefore, I would say that this series is probably best for intermediate and advanced players. Personally, I would recommend getting one of the books that are specific to your openings. But you should be prepared to put in some work to get the most out of the books.

About this book

Author:Carsten Hansen
Title:Catastrophes and tactics in the chess opening
Type of book:Tactics
Level:Intermediate/Advanced

Comments

Popular reviews

Judgement and planning

Some books "fly under the radar" and do not get the same attention as the evergreen classics. But sometimes, there is gold in old mines. And I found a little golden nugget while shopping for used books. A book written for amateurs, by (arguably) the best amateur of all time; former world champion Max Euwe. Sounds promising, right? If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from this book? In my previous review of Chess Fundamentals , said that few world champions have written books for beginners and intermediate players. Capablanca is, of course, one exception. And another is Max Euwe. Euwe is not the most well-known world champion. He was in his prime in the 1930s and 1940s, most notably in 1935 when he dethroned none other than the great Alexander Alekhine. Although many have suggested that Alekhine only lost because of heavy use of alcohol, beating him is no small feat (rega...

Nunn’s secrets

Let me tell you a secret. There is no such thing as 'the best chess books'. It all depends on the preferences and expectations of the reader and of course the work s/he puts in when working with the book. So just because someone else claims that a certain book belongs in the 'best books of all time' category, it does not necessarily mean that it is a book that you will appreciate. This little intro may have given away the content of this review, but that's ok. Secrets of practical chess is an example of a book that has gotten a lot of praise on a more than one occasion. So let's dig in and see what the fuss is all about. What can you expect from this book? Secrets of practical chess has seemingly been well received in the chess world. Overall, the opinions are very positive. John Watson gave it a very positive review , and Jacob Aagaard has listed it among the top 10 books of the 20th century . It is also mentioned in another list of 'best' books ....

Thoughts on chess improvement

I was recently interviewed by Kevin Scull  for his podcast  Chess Journeys: Tales of Adult Improvement . When I got the request, I started thinking about what I have to contribute with in terms of improvement advice for chess players. I ended up creating a mindmap of it all, and thought I would share it with you along with an elaboration of what it means. Three questions for you In my opinion, there are three main questions that you need to ask yourself in order to find your  path to chess improvement: Why am I doing this? What will I focus on? How will I study? I have tried (and failed) myself, many times. And what I've realized is that you cannot copy other people's plans for improvement; you need to create a personalized plan that is adapted to your goals, your needs and your general life situation. Don't copy other people's improvement plans Start with WHY I've seen a lot of adult players describe their chess goals. Almost all of them are defined in...

Understanding middlegames

Have you ever found yourself unable to find a move in the middlegame? Of course you have. We all have. About ten years ago, this was a recurring problem for me, which led to a lot of frustration. My conclusion was that I needed to learn how understand middlegames. So what better way than to read a book with the title Understanding Chess Middlegames ? Sound like the perfect remedy, right? Ok, let's find out. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron!   What can you expect from this book? I first read this book when I was just starting to study chess seriously. I bought it after reading a recommendation in an online forum. I would say this was ten years ago, but the book came out 2011, so it couldn't have been before that. Anyhow, my playing strength was probably around 1200 (I was unrated at the time) and I was having trouble choosing moves in non-tactical positions. Basically, I was playing without ...

Estimating playing strength

Have you ever felt like your chess rating doesn't represent your actual playing strength? Sometimes we want to be able to estimate playing strength based on individual games rather than rating (which changes more slowly). During the past few months, I've been taking a number of online courses and learning python for data analysis. In one of the courses, the final project allowed me to choose my own dataset. So surprise surprise! I chose something chess related. (Not really surprised, are you?) When we play games online, getting a computer evaluation is just a few clicks away. And a commonly used statistic is the average centipawn loss, or simply the average deviation from the computer's best move. Many of us tend to think that centipawn loss (CPL) is a good estimate of playing strength. And, of course, it gives some indication, but it's far from a perfect predictor. Fellow chess/statistics blogger Patrick Coulombe has investigated the correlation between rating and CPL ...