Skip to main content

Next level patzer

I have a new goal. I am going to become a Grandpatzer. You read that correctly; it's not a typo. As you probably know, Grandpatzer is not an official title, and the term is actually not very established at all. But there is a very entertaining and enlightening book by the title Secrets of a Grandpatzer by Kenneth Mark Colby. When I saw it, I fell for it directly and bought it without hesitation. If you are as enticed by this book as I was, please read on for my full review.

What can you expect from this book?

Kenneth Mark Colby (1920-2001) was a professor in psychiatry and an amateur chess player. In the introduction of the book, he describes how he 'floundered around' as a 1600-patzer for several years before deciding to do something about it. He did something about it, and achieved a 1800+ rating within a year. This book describes the his 'secret' method so that you and I can do the same.

The book was first released in 1979. My copy is a reprint from 2011 with a foreword by Michael Stewart, who explains that he raised his rating from 1990 to 2308 by following the advice in the book. So there is probably something to be learned here.

The book is divided into five sections: (1) Introduction, (2), How to study, (3) How to play, (4) How to play against other types of players and (5) Computer chess. So when I first picked up the book and read the table of contents, I expected that the final section would be completely outdated and irrelevant. But I was wrong. The entire book is highly entertaining and written by a man with a great ability to separate the essentials from nonsense. Even the section on computer chess is very relevant, except from the simple fact that you shouldn't expect to beat many computer programs today.

According to Colby there are about 130 patterns that you need to know in order to reach the ranks of a Grandpatzer. These include some basic endgames, such as blockading, creating passed pawns and battle of minor pieces (hello mr. Silman).

Colby also argues that you should know your openings. Play a limited number of openings, e.g. one system with white and the King's Indian or Modern with black. Much like Dan Heisman, Colby recommends that you should learn your openings at least one move deeper for each game (when you review it). He also recommends that you go through master games, but only the ones that feature your openings. Study the games and try to guess the next move for the side that you usually play and compare your ideas to the choices of the master(s). Finally, you should learn the endgames that your openings tend to lead to. This approach is basically what is recommended by JJ Lang on the Perpetual Chess podcast (Have a listen!).

Of course, you also need to work on your tactics. However, Colby doesn't give much details here. But he does provide a simplified thinking process that he calls the 'Grandpatzer 3-step', which is basically checking for tactics, choosing a move and visualizing it. Then you check for tactics again in the new position and repeat the steps until you reach a 'quiescent' position.

One thing that I really like about this book is that it is written by someone who has a full-time job outside of chess - just like most of us. He truly understands that time is a limited resource, so his advice is geared towards making the most of the little time you have. Therefore, refreshingly, he challenges much of the study advice that you may see from top-level Grandmasters. The principles that apply to masters are not necessarily relevant for the aspiring Grandpatzer. If your goal is to become a Grandmaster it's a different story. I think Colby summarizes this nicely in the following quote (p. 47).
Well-meaning master annotations can be infelicitous for the non-master player. It does little good to mechanically play through master games move by move while reading off the annotations. It does not rub off on you. Often the most puzzling parts of the game are not commented on at all.
Someone who has a full-time job and perhaps also a few kids simply does not have the luxury of spending entire days delving into the intricacies of the Grünfeld or to play through all the games from the My Great Predecessors series (however great they may be). We're on a tight time budget. The struggle is real. This book provides some comfort in that area. Aaaah!

Who should read this book?

Secrets of a Grandpatzer is an inspiring little book. It is a fun and easy read, and has a lot of practical tips for how to reach the highest heights of patzerdom. I would say the target audience is in the 1400-1800 rating range. However, the book is clearly written with an adult audience in mind. That doesn't mean it cannot be read by kids, but the language and some references may be a bit off key for the younger readers. I really enjoyed it, and recommend that you check it out.

About this book

Author:Kenneth Mark Colby
Title:Secrets of a Grandpatzer 
Type of book:Chess improvement
Level:Intermediate

Comments

Popular reviews

Understanding middlegames

Have you ever found yourself unable to find a move in the middlegame? Of course you have. We all have. About ten years ago, this was a recurring problem for me, which led to a lot of frustration. My conclusion was that I needed to learn how understand middlegames. So what better way than to read a book with the title Understanding Chess Middlegames ? Sound like the perfect remedy, right? Ok, let's find out. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron!   What can you expect from this book? I first read this book when I was just starting to study chess seriously. I bought it after reading a recommendation in an online forum. I would say this was ten years ago, but the book came out 2011, so it couldn't have been before that. Anyhow, my playing strength was probably around 1200 (I was unrated at the time) and I was having trouble choosing moves in non-tactical positions. Basically, I was playing without ...

Chaos on the board

Have you ever felt tired of chess? Maybe you’ve been uninspired or perhaps you think it’s too much work. To paraphrase a famous movie: All work and no play makes you a dull person. If that is the case, I may have a cure. You need a fun chess book. Something that will rekindle your joy for the game and inspire you to play creatively. I give you Tiger’s Chaos Theory ! This book found me at a time when I needed it the most. My inspiration and motivation to study chess was way down. And like a bolt from the blue, the Swedish Chess Federation approached me and wanted me to review this book. And the kind people at Quality Chess agreed to send me a review copy. An offer I couldn't refuse. So after this happy turn of events, I have a new review for you. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from this book? Grandmaster Tiger Hillarp Persson, a multi-time Swedish chess champion, has al...

My system should be your system?

One of the greates classics of chess literature. That's at least what it says on the cover. But let's not judge a book by the cover. Instead, we could listen to what others have said about this book. In his review of My system , John Watson writes: "We no longer consider many classics to be essential to a chess education, not since the Internet; but if there’s an exception, Nimzowitch’s work is it". These are big words from a big man. Watson is an authority of chess theory, so his evaluation should not be taken too lightly. Although My system has frequently been mentioned among the greatest books of all time, and has been recommended by many players , it has also been the subject of controversy. Of course, when the book was first published (almost 100 years ago), many ideas in the book challenged many of the established principles of chess theory at the time, and other authorities dismissed the ideas. But also to this day, many people are unimpressed with the b...

Under the surface

I did something different. I bought a chess book without doing any research. I decided to reward myself with a new book after having written ten reviews. So I asked my friends on Twitter for suggestions, and someone suggested that I take a look at the book Under the surface by Jan Markos. Since the book is quite new, I couldn't find much information about it, so I decided to blindly trust the recommendation. Luckily, I was not let down. What can you expect from this book? I am not the only one who has done something different. Jan Markos did the same when he wrote Under the surface . He takes a quite philosophical approach to chess, which should probably be expected from a former student of philosophy. This comes across quite clearly in his choice of chapter titles. The names "Magnetic Skin", "Anatoly Karpov's Billiard Balls" and "On the Breaking Ice" are not the most transparent chapter titles in the world. But once you get under the surfa...

Estimating playing strength

Have you ever felt like your chess rating doesn't represent your actual playing strength? Sometimes we want to be able to estimate playing strength based on individual games rather than rating (which changes more slowly). During the past few months, I've been taking a number of online courses and learning python for data analysis. In one of the courses, the final project allowed me to choose my own dataset. So surprise surprise! I chose something chess related. (Not really surprised, are you?) When we play games online, getting a computer evaluation is just a few clicks away. And a commonly used statistic is the average centipawn loss, or simply the average deviation from the computer's best move. Many of us tend to think that centipawn loss (CPL) is a good estimate of playing strength. And, of course, it gives some indication, but it's far from a perfect predictor. Fellow chess/statistics blogger Patrick Coulombe has investigated the correlation between rating and CPL ...