Skip to main content

Next level patzer

I have a new goal. I am going to become a Grandpatzer. You read that correctly; it's not a typo. As you probably know, Grandpatzer is not an official title, and the term is actually not very established at all. But there is a very entertaining and enlightening book by the title Secrets of a Grandpatzer by Kenneth Mark Colby. When I saw it, I fell for it directly and bought it without hesitation. If you are as enticed by this book as I was, please read on for my full review.

What can you expect from this book?

Kenneth Mark Colby (1920-2001) was a professor in psychiatry and an amateur chess player. In the introduction of the book, he describes how he 'floundered around' as a 1600-patzer for several years before deciding to do something about it. He did something about it, and achieved a 1800+ rating within a year. This book describes the his 'secret' method so that you and I can do the same.

The book was first released in 1979. My copy is a reprint from 2011 with a foreword by Michael Stewart, who explains that he raised his rating from 1990 to 2308 by following the advice in the book. So there is probably something to be learned here.

The book is divided into five sections: (1) Introduction, (2), How to study, (3) How to play, (4) How to play against other types of players and (5) Computer chess. So when I first picked up the book and read the table of contents, I expected that the final section would be completely outdated and irrelevant. But I was wrong. The entire book is highly entertaining and written by a man with a great ability to separate the essentials from nonsense. Even the section on computer chess is very relevant, except from the simple fact that you shouldn't expect to beat many computer programs today.

According to Colby there are about 130 patterns that you need to know in order to reach the ranks of a Grandpatzer. These include some basic endgames, such as blockading, creating passed pawns and battle of minor pieces (hello mr. Silman).

Colby also argues that you should know your openings. Play a limited number of openings, e.g. one system with white and the King's Indian or Modern with black. Much like Dan Heisman, Colby recommends that you should learn your openings at least one move deeper for each game (when you review it). He also recommends that you go through master games, but only the ones that feature your openings. Study the games and try to guess the next move for the side that you usually play and compare your ideas to the choices of the master(s). Finally, you should learn the endgames that your openings tend to lead to. This approach is basically what is recommended by JJ Lang on the Perpetual Chess podcast (Have a listen!).

Of course, you also need to work on your tactics. However, Colby doesn't give much details here. But he does provide a simplified thinking process that he calls the 'Grandpatzer 3-step', which is basically checking for tactics, choosing a move and visualizing it. Then you check for tactics again in the new position and repeat the steps until you reach a 'quiescent' position.

One thing that I really like about this book is that it is written by someone who has a full-time job outside of chess - just like most of us. He truly understands that time is a limited resource, so his advice is geared towards making the most of the little time you have. Therefore, refreshingly, he challenges much of the study advice that you may see from top-level Grandmasters. The principles that apply to masters are not necessarily relevant for the aspiring Grandpatzer. If your goal is to become a Grandmaster it's a different story. I think Colby summarizes this nicely in the following quote (p. 47).
Well-meaning master annotations can be infelicitous for the non-master player. It does little good to mechanically play through master games move by move while reading off the annotations. It does not rub off on you. Often the most puzzling parts of the game are not commented on at all.
Someone who has a full-time job and perhaps also a few kids simply does not have the luxury of spending entire days delving into the intricacies of the Grünfeld or to play through all the games from the My Great Predecessors series (however great they may be). We're on a tight time budget. The struggle is real. This book provides some comfort in that area. Aaaah!

Who should read this book?

Secrets of a Grandpatzer is an inspiring little book. It is a fun and easy read, and has a lot of practical tips for how to reach the highest heights of patzerdom. I would say the target audience is in the 1400-1800 rating range. However, the book is clearly written with an adult audience in mind. That doesn't mean it cannot be read by kids, but the language and some references may be a bit off key for the younger readers. I really enjoyed it, and recommend that you check it out.

About this book

Author:Kenneth Mark Colby
Title:Secrets of a Grandpatzer 
Type of book:Chess improvement
Level:Intermediate

Comments

Popular reviews

Judgement and planning

Some books "fly under the radar" and do not get the same attention as the evergreen classics. But sometimes, there is gold in old mines. And I found a little golden nugget while shopping for used books. A book written for amateurs, by (arguably) the best amateur of all time; former world champion Max Euwe. Sounds promising, right? If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from this book? In my previous review of Chess Fundamentals , said that few world champions have written books for beginners and intermediate players. Capablanca is, of course, one exception. And another is Max Euwe. Euwe is not the most well-known world champion. He was in his prime in the 1930s and 1940s, most notably in 1935 when he dethroned none other than the great Alexander Alekhine. Although many have suggested that Alekhine only lost because of heavy use of alcohol, beating him is no small feat (rega...

Nunn’s secrets

Let me tell you a secret. There is no such thing as 'the best chess books'. It all depends on the preferences and expectations of the reader and of course the work s/he puts in when working with the book. So just because someone else claims that a certain book belongs in the 'best books of all time' category, it does not necessarily mean that it is a book that you will appreciate. This little intro may have given away the content of this review, but that's ok. Secrets of practical chess is an example of a book that has gotten a lot of praise on a more than one occasion. So let's dig in and see what the fuss is all about. What can you expect from this book? Secrets of practical chess has seemingly been well received in the chess world. Overall, the opinions are very positive. John Watson gave it a very positive review , and Jacob Aagaard has listed it among the top 10 books of the 20th century . It is also mentioned in another list of 'best' books ....

Understanding middlegames

Have you ever found yourself unable to find a move in the middlegame? Of course you have. We all have. About ten years ago, this was a recurring problem for me, which led to a lot of frustration. My conclusion was that I needed to learn how understand middlegames. So what better way than to read a book with the title Understanding Chess Middlegames ? Sound like the perfect remedy, right? Ok, let's find out. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron!   What can you expect from this book? I first read this book when I was just starting to study chess seriously. I bought it after reading a recommendation in an online forum. I would say this was ten years ago, but the book came out 2011, so it couldn't have been before that. Anyhow, my playing strength was probably around 1200 (I was unrated at the time) and I was having trouble choosing moves in non-tactical positions. Basically, I was playing without ...

Estimating playing strength

Have you ever felt like your chess rating doesn't represent your actual playing strength? Sometimes we want to be able to estimate playing strength based on individual games rather than rating (which changes more slowly). During the past few months, I've been taking a number of online courses and learning python for data analysis. In one of the courses, the final project allowed me to choose my own dataset. So surprise surprise! I chose something chess related. (Not really surprised, are you?) When we play games online, getting a computer evaluation is just a few clicks away. And a commonly used statistic is the average centipawn loss, or simply the average deviation from the computer's best move. Many of us tend to think that centipawn loss (CPL) is a good estimate of playing strength. And, of course, it gives some indication, but it's far from a perfect predictor. Fellow chess/statistics blogger Patrick Coulombe has investigated the correlation between rating and CPL ...

Questions of modern chess theory

A Soviet classic - that's what it says on the front cover. And for good reason, I think. At the beginning of this year, I decided I would invest some time studying strategy books. I already had a number of them in my collection, and then I stumbled upon a thread in the facebook group ”chess book collectors”. The post contained some controversial claims about the book Question of modern chess theory , which was unfamiliar to me at the time. The post and the ensuing discussions piqued my interest, and I decided to check it out. After some research, I realized that this was a stepping stone for many other books, so I put it at the top of my reading list. I read it during the summer, but haven't got around to writing a review before now. So I actually had to read it again. Anywho, I am finally ready to share my thoughts with the world. Hope you enjoy it. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! Wha...