Skip to main content

It's your move

This book came to my attention when reading Dan Heisman's book A Guide to Chess Improvement.
Heisman recommends the "improvers" part of this book as one of several books that should be used for post-beginners who want to sure up their chess foundation. I have come to develop a deep respect for Heisman's recommendations, so I thought I'd give it a try. I was not disappointed.

This specific book is actually a collection of three books: It's your Move, It's your Move - Improvers and It's your move - Tough Puzzles.

What can you expect from this book?

I have labeled this as a middlegame/tactics book below. The puzzles actually cover all parts of the game, but I find that the majority of the puzzles are either direct tactics or find-the-plan type of problems.

The book has a quite original structure. Each part contains 5 "tests" that consist of 10 puzzles each. In each puzzle, you are given a position and a short description of the challenge at hand, and requested to find the best continuation. So far, nothing new. But what sets this book apart from others is that it is actually multiple choice. Ward has created five fictional characters, different ones in each book. In the third book (tough puzzles), they are Analytical Anatoly, Battling Boris, Creative Chris (Ward?), Desperate Dan and Elegant Elizabeth. As their names suggest, they have different personalities and different preferences. Each character suggests a solution to the problem. Most of the times, several suggestions seem reasonable, which can make it tricky to choose the correct one. You can of course make the puzzles slightly more difficult by trying to come up with a solution without checking the five suggestions.

The setup in the book is similar to the situation you face when playing a game. The book thereby provides examples of how the reader may generate candidate moves and plans in his or her own games. In the solutions, Ward provides detailed explanations of why some suggestions are better than others. You are awarded points for your answers; 10 points for each correct answer, and solutions that aren't outright wrong are worth points as well. You can tally up your score and see how Ward would evaluate your abilities.
Each puzzle can be seen as a small lesson, and there is not much text. This makes it a great book to pick up when you have limited time to study. If, for some reason, you are interrupted during your studies, the reset time is minimal.

One drawback of the book is that it is written with Comic Sans font. But hey, that was a thing at the time the book was written. =)

Who should read this book?

This is three books in one, with different levels of difficulty. The different parts of the book are useful for players at the beginner, intermediate and advanced level, respectively. Once you have a reasonable knowledge about fundamental tactics, the first book (improvers) should be a good choice. For somewhat more advanced players (about 1400-1600 FIDE), the second book may be useful. The final one (tough puzzles) is suitable for stronger players with ratings from about 1600 and up to 2000.

About this book

Author:Chris Ward
Title:It's Your Move x3
Type of book:Middlegame/Tactics
Level:Beginner/Intermediate/Advanced

Comments

Popular reviews

Chaos on the board

Have you ever felt tired of chess? Maybe you’ve been uninspired or perhaps you think it’s too much work. To paraphrase a famous movie: All work and no play makes you a dull person. If that is the case, I may have a cure. You need a fun chess book. Something that will rekindle your joy for the game and inspire you to play creatively. I give you Tiger’s Chaos Theory ! This book found me at a time when I needed it the most. My inspiration and motivation to study chess was way down. And like a bolt from the blue, the Swedish Chess Federation approached me and wanted me to review this book. And the kind people at Quality Chess agreed to send me a review copy. An offer I couldn't refuse. So after this happy turn of events, I have a new review for you. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from this book? Grandmaster Tiger Hillarp Persson, a multi-time Swedish chess champion, has al...

Winning chess strategies

Chess strategy is one of the most elusive and difficult parts of chess. Compared to the direct and transparent world of chess tactics, strategy can be confusing and opaque. At the patzer level, tactical strikes that gain material or lead to checkmate can be obvious (provided that one understands the tactic). However, in many cases, strong players claim that a move is obvious although it doesn't result in material gain or even a semblance of an attack. We, the patzers of the world, scratch our heads and wonder how on earth anyone can find such moves obvious. How can we take steps towards this deeper level of chess understanding? Picking up a basic strategy book is a good first step. And that's what I did here. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from this book? As a part of my ambition to deepen my understanding of chess strategy, I took on a mission of reading (and rev...

My system should be your system?

One of the greates classics of chess literature. That's at least what it says on the cover. But let's not judge a book by the cover. Instead, we could listen to what others have said about this book. In his review of My system , John Watson writes: "We no longer consider many classics to be essential to a chess education, not since the Internet; but if there’s an exception, Nimzowitch’s work is it". These are big words from a big man. Watson is an authority of chess theory, so his evaluation should not be taken too lightly. Although My system has frequently been mentioned among the greatest books of all time, and has been recommended by many players , it has also been the subject of controversy. Of course, when the book was first published (almost 100 years ago), many ideas in the book challenged many of the established principles of chess theory at the time, and other authorities dismissed the ideas. But also to this day, many people are unimpressed with the b...

Estimating playing strength

Have you ever felt like your chess rating doesn't represent your actual playing strength? Sometimes we want to be able to estimate playing strength based on individual games rather than rating (which changes more slowly). During the past few months, I've been taking a number of online courses and learning python for data analysis. In one of the courses, the final project allowed me to choose my own dataset. So surprise surprise! I chose something chess related. (Not really surprised, are you?) When we play games online, getting a computer evaluation is just a few clicks away. And a commonly used statistic is the average centipawn loss, or simply the average deviation from the computer's best move. Many of us tend to think that centipawn loss (CPL) is a good estimate of playing strength. And, of course, it gives some indication, but it's far from a perfect predictor. Fellow chess/statistics blogger Patrick Coulombe has investigated the correlation between rating and CPL ...

Understanding middlegames

Have you ever found yourself unable to find a move in the middlegame? Of course you have. We all have. About ten years ago, this was a recurring problem for me, which led to a lot of frustration. My conclusion was that I needed to learn how understand middlegames. So what better way than to read a book with the title Understanding Chess Middlegames ? Sound like the perfect remedy, right? Ok, let's find out. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron!   What can you expect from this book? I first read this book when I was just starting to study chess seriously. I bought it after reading a recommendation in an online forum. I would say this was ten years ago, but the book came out 2011, so it couldn't have been before that. Anyhow, my playing strength was probably around 1200 (I was unrated at the time) and I was having trouble choosing moves in non-tactical positions. Basically, I was playing without ...