The nation's gambit

There are just not enough novels with a chess theme. The nation's gambit (Original title: En nasjon i sjakk) is an exception. I heard about the book when it came out, but since I usually don't like crime novels, I paid little attention to it. During a book sale, I found the book at a very low price, and decided to give it a chance. Surprisingly, I ended up enjoying it.

If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details.
Become a Patron!

What can you expect from this book?

The nation's gambit is the debut novel by Norwegian author Johan Høst. The original title "En nasjon i sjakk" literally translates to "a nation in check", which is a play on words; being in check vs in shock. In Norwegian, the word for chess and check is the same, which puts chess directly in the title. This doesn't work as well in English, which probably explains why the English title is a bit different.

The outline of the book is that the Norwegian prime minister has been kidnapped and put in a cage in front of the parliament building. The cage is rigged with a timed bomb, and the kidnapper/terrorist challenges the government to a game of chess. But what's the catch?

This chess game has higher stakes than your normal game. Every time the terrorist captures a piece, someone dies. If the king falls (checkmate), the prime minister will be blown to bits. If the authorities don't make a move, the time will run out, and the prime minister will be blown to bits. Apart from the bomb, you'll recognize this plot from the 90's series Twin Peaks in which Windom Earle challenges agent Cooper to a game with similar premises.

When playing a chess game with stakes at this level, you need help. So the authorities turn to the strongest chess player in the country: Magnus Carlsen. Only problem is, he is not available – bummer! So they turn to the unknown (but equally famous) Sven Øen, who is also a top level player.

In the book, we follow the drama on the chess board in parallel with how the government officials and the police piece together the clues. As more pieces come off the board, more people fall victim to the terrorist, and more information is made available to reveal the identity of the terrorist.

Overall, I think this is a fun take on the crime genre. I don't think the authorities would agree to play a chess game against a terrorist – at least not with these conditions. But apart from that, it's a good story and a very entertaining read – even for someone like me who don't usually like crime novels.

Who should read this book?

This is a crime novel and not a chess book. Although the chess has a central role in the book, no chess knowledge is required. So this is a book for anyone - more or less. Being a crime story, it has a bit of violence and murder, which makes the book unsuitable for children. Apart from that, I would recommend this as a light read to anyone.

About this book

Author:	Johan Høst
Title:	The nation's gambit / En nasjon i sjakk
Type of book:	Miscellaneous
Level:	Any

Comments

Popular reviews

Judgement and planning

Some books "fly under the radar" and do not get the same attention as the evergreen classics. But sometimes, there is gold in old mines. And I found a little golden nugget while shopping for used books. A book written for amateurs, by (arguably) the best amateur of all time; former world champion Max Euwe. Sounds promising, right? If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from this book? In my previous review of Chess Fundamentals , said that few world champions have written books for beginners and intermediate players. Capablanca is, of course, one exception. And another is Max Euwe. Euwe is not the most well-known world champion. He was in his prime in the 1930s and 1940s, most notably in 1935 when he dethroned none other than the great Alexander Alekhine. Although many have suggested that Alekhine only lost because of heavy use of alcohol, beating him is no small feat (rega...

Nunn’s secrets

Let me tell you a secret. There is no such thing as 'the best chess books'. It all depends on the preferences and expectations of the reader and of course the work s/he puts in when working with the book. So just because someone else claims that a certain book belongs in the 'best books of all time' category, it does not necessarily mean that it is a book that you will appreciate. This little intro may have given away the content of this review, but that's ok. Secrets of practical chess is an example of a book that has gotten a lot of praise on a more than one occasion. So let's dig in and see what the fuss is all about. What can you expect from this book? Secrets of practical chess has seemingly been well received in the chess world. Overall, the opinions are very positive. John Watson gave it a very positive review , and Jacob Aagaard has listed it among the top 10 books of the 20th century . It is also mentioned in another list of 'best' books ....

Understanding middlegames

Have you ever found yourself unable to find a move in the middlegame? Of course you have. We all have. About ten years ago, this was a recurring problem for me, which led to a lot of frustration. My conclusion was that I needed to learn how understand middlegames. So what better way than to read a book with the title Understanding Chess Middlegames ? Sound like the perfect remedy, right? Ok, let's find out. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from this book? I first read this book when I was just starting to study chess seriously. I bought it after reading a recommendation in an online forum. I would say this was ten years ago, but the book came out 2011, so it couldn't have been before that. Anyhow, my playing strength was probably around 1200 (I was unrated at the time) and I was having trouble choosing moves in non-tactical positions. Basically, I was playing without ...

Estimating playing strength

Have you ever felt like your chess rating doesn't represent your actual playing strength? Sometimes we want to be able to estimate playing strength based on individual games rather than rating (which changes more slowly). During the past few months, I've been taking a number of online courses and learning python for data analysis. In one of the courses, the final project allowed me to choose my own dataset. So surprise surprise! I chose something chess related. (Not really surprised, are you?) When we play games online, getting a computer evaluation is just a few clicks away. And a commonly used statistic is the average centipawn loss, or simply the average deviation from the computer's best move. Many of us tend to think that centipawn loss (CPL) is a good estimate of playing strength. And, of course, it gives some indication, but it's far from a perfect predictor. Fellow chess/statistics blogger Patrick Coulombe has investigated the correlation between rating and CPL ...

Questions of modern chess theory

A Soviet classic - that's what it says on the front cover. And for good reason, I think. At the beginning of this year, I decided I would invest some time studying strategy books. I already had a number of them in my collection, and then I stumbled upon a thread in the facebook group ”chess book collectors”. The post contained some controversial claims about the book Question of modern chess theory , which was unfamiliar to me at the time. The post and the ensuing discussions piqued my interest, and I decided to check it out. After some research, I realized that this was a stepping stone for many other books, so I put it at the top of my reading list. I read it during the summer, but haven't got around to writing a review before now. So I actually had to read it again. Anywho, I am finally ready to share my thoughts with the world. Hope you enjoy it. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! Wha...

Patzer's review

Search This Blog