An incomplete bible

A few months ago, I was planning an endgame course at my local club. I based my course almost entirely on Silman's endgame course, but I wanted to include a bishop+knight mate, which Silman doesn't cover. And accidentally, I stumbled across a book which does cover this endgame. So I decided to take a closer look at the rest of it as well. What I found out is that the book has many other interesting topics, but I have some quibbles about the title. Read on to see why.

If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details.
Become a Patron!

What can you expect from this book?

The tactics bible is not your typical tactics book. Most tactics books are very heavy on puzzles, and only contain short descriptions of tactical themes. This book is the diametrical opposite. There are no traditional puzzles in the book. Instead, the book puts emphasis on examples and explanations.

In the first two chapters, Grivas presents 133 examples of games where tactics play an important role. The book starts off with the most famous games, such as the 'immortal game' (Anderssen - Kieseritzky 1851) and the 'evergreen game' (Anderssen - Dufresne 1852). The second chapter contains the majority of the games. These are sorted by – in my opinion – quite arbitrary themes, such as "the king hunt" and "defence & counter attack". The games are instructive an well annotated. But the author could just as well have used the same number of pages to present "traditional" tactics and puzzles. I am not sure if this decision is brilliant or questionable. Either way, it is decision that puts this book apart from other books.

The remaining chapters focus entirely on checkmate patterns. Chapter 3 describes the proper execution of "theoretical" checkmates (e.g. two rooks, king+queen, king+rook, two bishops, bishop+knight). Chapter 4 and 5 don't describe methods as such, but rather presents various checkmate patterns. The chapters contain about 30 named checkmate themes (e.g. Arabian mate, Greco's mate, hook mate etc). For some reason, the presentation is divided into two chapters (Ch 4: mates with heavy pieces, Ch 5: mates with minor pieces and pawns). The mating patterns are presented one by one in subsequent sections. They are first given a brief presentation followed by a few examples from games and studies. For me, these two chapters make up the best part of the book. I find it quite useful to be able to look up the name of a mating pattern and find a number of examples. However — as the author states — the names do not really matter. But I find that it can knowing the names can sometimes help the conversation about mating patterns and assist memory.

With a book title like this, expectations will be high. For me personally, I expect 'the bible' to be the definitive resource on the topic at hand. So when picking up this book, I expect it to be a one-stop guide to tactics. Unfortunately, this is not the case. The book does discuss a lot of tactics, but not the most common tactical patterns that most of us are used to (e.g. pins, forks and skewers). For me, this seems like a major omission for a book with such a bold title. Some may argue that showing tactical games (which the book does) is a better idea. I am a bit undecided on this question.

Also, for a book with such emphasis on sample games, I find it peculiar that there is no reference section or a list of players/games. So if you're looking for a particular game, you'll have to flip through the entire chapter. This is not a major issue, but another unusual decision.

What I like about this book is that it describes the proper methods for basic checkmates such as the infamous bishop+knight checkmate. Also, I like having access to more or less all known checkmate patterns collected in one volume.

Who should read this book?

If you are looking for the ultimate book on tactics, this is not what you are looking for. Instead, this book is great for getting acquainted with common mating patterns. The book is probably best for beginners, but it can also be used by intermediate players who feel the need to brush up on these issues.

About this book

Author:	Efstratios Grivas
Title:	The Tactics Bible
Type of book:	Tactics
Level:	Beginner, Intermediate

Comments

Popular reviews

Under the surface

I did something different. I bought a chess book without doing any research. I decided to reward myself with a new book after having written ten reviews. So I asked my friends on Twitter for suggestions, and someone suggested that I take a look at the book Under the surface by Jan Markos. Since the book is quite new, I couldn't find much information about it, so I decided to blindly trust the recommendation. Luckily, I was not let down. What can you expect from this book? I am not the only one who has done something different. Jan Markos did the same when he wrote Under the surface . He takes a quite philosophical approach to chess, which should probably be expected from a former student of philosophy. This comes across quite clearly in his choice of chapter titles. The names "Magnetic Skin", "Anatoly Karpov's Billiard Balls" and "On the Breaking Ice" are not the most transparent chapter titles in the world. But once you get under the surfa...

Learn chess tactics

Where should you turn for tactics training? This is a frequently occuring question, not only from beginners, but also from intermediate players. Which books are suitable for your specific level, and which ones should you get? In this review, I take on a book that I suggest you do get - at least if you're at or near the beginning of your chess development. This was actually my first tactics book back in the day, and I recently reread it in order to give a proper review. I remember that I liked it the first time around and that my tactical skills improved. Although rereading it didn't contribute all that much to my learning, I still have a good impression of it. Please read on for more details. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from this book? Learn Chess Tactics is written by the one and only John Nunn, and (as the name implies) it is a tactics book. I would go as f...

Master of strategy

During the past two years, I’ve been working on improving my strategic/positional play. In this process, I have read a number of books, and two books that have long been on my reading list are the strategy books by Johan Hellsten. So when the Swedish chess federation requested reviewers for two of these books, I didn’t hesitate. I am happy that I was given the opportunity to review these books, and hope this review can be of help to you as a reader. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from these books? Johan Hellsten has created a name for himself as one of the leading experts of chess strategy in modern times. His series of strategy books ( Mastering Opening Strategy , Mastering Chess Strategy and Mastering Endgame Strategy ) have received glowing reviews from many parts of the chess world. So it feels good to finally dig into these nuggets. His endgame book is still in my boo...

The best book for patzers?

I have been playing chess since I was a kid, but until about 10 years ago (2009), I had not even considered reading chess books. For some reason, this changed. I cannot remember why, but I decided I wanted to learn more about chess and probably pick up a book or two. I searched the Internet and consulted a few online chess forums, and was recommended the book The Amateur's Mind by Jeremy Silman. I bought the book, and that was the start of my growing collection of chess books. The Amateur's Mind has had a tremendous impact on my understanding of the game. Prior to Reading this book, I had no idea about how to evaluate a position or how to play the opening properly (or any other phase of the game, for that matter). I saw my results improving dramatically, and gained a couple of hundred rating points in just a few months. At this point, I only played online, so I did not have a "proper" rating. But regardless, I learned a lot from reading the book. What can y...

Think first or think later? - part 1

This is a different kind of review. It's not just a review of one book, but two (actually three). Therefore, it's written in two parts, and this is part 1. I have chosen the book Move first, think later by Willy Hendriks and Understanding before moving by Herman Grooten (which is actually a series, with two books so far). The main reason I chose these books is that the titles indicate completely opposite views of how to approach chess: Think before you move or just move and think later. So how should a patzer like me make sense of this? I read the book on Forward Chess , which was a new experience for me. The service is available for various operative systems. I used the app on my iPad. One advantage is that it allows you to click through the variations instead of just visualizing them in your head. You can of course skip this, if you want to train your visualization skills. Another good thing is that you can try out various moves that are not in the book and switch on an ...

Patzer's review

Search This Blog