Skip to main content

An incomplete bible

A few months ago, I was planning an endgame course at my local club. I based my course almost entirely on Silman's endgame course, but I wanted to include a bishop+knight mate, which Silman doesn't cover. And accidentally, I stumbled across a book which does cover this endgame. So I decided to take a closer look at the rest of it as well. What I found out is that the book has many other interesting topics, but I have some quibbles about the title. Read on to see why.
 
If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details.
Become a Patron!

What can you expect from this book?

The tactics bible is not your typical tactics book. Most tactics books are very heavy on puzzles, and only contain short descriptions of tactical themes. This book is the diametrical opposite. There are no traditional puzzles in the book. Instead, the book puts emphasis on examples and explanations.

In the first two chapters, Grivas presents 133 examples of games where tactics play an important role. The book starts off with the most famous games, such as the 'immortal game' (Anderssen - Kieseritzky 1851) and the 'evergreen game' (Anderssen - Dufresne 1852). The second chapter contains the majority of the games. These are sorted by – in my opinion – quite arbitrary themes, such as "the king hunt" and "defence & counter attack". The games are instructive an well annotated. But the author could just as well have used the same number of pages to present "traditional" tactics and puzzles. I am not sure if this decision is brilliant or questionable. Either way, it is decision that puts this book apart from other books.

The remaining chapters focus entirely on checkmate patterns. Chapter 3 describes the proper execution of "theoretical" checkmates (e.g. two rooks, king+queen, king+rook, two bishops, bishop+knight). Chapter 4 and 5 don't describe methods as such, but rather presents various checkmate patterns. The chapters contain about 30 named checkmate themes (e.g. Arabian mate, Greco's mate, hook mate etc).  For some reason, the presentation is divided into two chapters (Ch 4: mates with heavy pieces, Ch 5: mates with minor pieces and pawns). The mating patterns are presented one by one in subsequent sections. They are first given a brief presentation followed by a few examples from games and studies. For me, these two chapters make up the best part of the book. I find it quite useful to be able to look up the name of a mating pattern and find a number of examples. However — as the author states — the names do not really matter. But I find that it can knowing the names can sometimes help the conversation about mating patterns and assist memory.

With a book title like this, expectations will be high. For me personally, I expect 'the bible' to be the definitive resource on the topic at hand. So when picking up this book, I expect it to be a one-stop guide to tactics. Unfortunately, this is not the case. The book does discuss a lot of tactics, but not the most common tactical patterns that most of us are used to (e.g. pins, forks and skewers). For me, this seems like a major omission for a book with such a bold title. Some may argue that showing tactical games (which the book does) is a better idea. I am a bit undecided on this question.

Also, for a book with such emphasis on sample games, I find it peculiar that there is no reference section or a list of players/games. So if you're looking for a particular game, you'll have to flip through the entire chapter. This is not a major issue, but another unusual decision.

What I like about this book is that it describes the proper methods for basic checkmates such as the infamous bishop+knight checkmate. Also, I like having access to more or less all known checkmate patterns collected in one volume.

Who should read this book?

If you are looking for the ultimate book on tactics, this is not what you are looking for. Instead, this book is great for getting acquainted with common mating patterns. The book is probably best for beginners, but it can also be used by intermediate players who feel the need to brush up on these issues. 

About this book

Author:Efstratios Grivas
Title:The Tactics Bible
Type of book:Tactics
Level:Beginner, Intermediate

Comments

Popular reviews

Master of strategy

During the past two years, I’ve been working on improving my strategic/positional play. In this process, I have read a number of books, and two books that have long been on my reading list are the strategy books by Johan Hellsten. So when the Swedish chess federation requested reviewers for two of these books, I didn’t hesitate. I am happy that I was given the opportunity to review these books, and hope this review can be of help to you as a reader. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from these books? Johan Hellsten has created a name for himself as one of the leading experts of chess strategy in modern times. His series of strategy books ( Mastering Opening Strategy , Mastering Chess Strategy and Mastering Endgame Strategy ) have received glowing reviews from many parts of the chess world. So it feels good to finally dig into these nuggets. His endgame book is still in my boo...

Winning chess strategies

Chess strategy is one of the most elusive and difficult parts of chess. Compared to the direct and transparent world of chess tactics, strategy can be confusing and opaque. At the patzer level, tactical strikes that gain material or lead to checkmate can be obvious (provided that one understands the tactic). However, in many cases, strong players claim that a move is obvious although it doesn't result in material gain or even a semblance of an attack. We, the patzers of the world, scratch our heads and wonder how on earth anyone can find such moves obvious. How can we take steps towards this deeper level of chess understanding? Picking up a basic strategy book is a good first step. And that's what I did here. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from this book? As a part of my ambition to deepen my understanding of chess strategy, I took on a mission of reading (and rev...

Stop and reassess!

In my very first post on this blog, I reviewed The Amateur's Mind by Jeremy Silman. That was my first step to understand chess strategy. And I actually bought another one of Silman's book at the same time, but for some reason, it took me more than ten years to read. I finally decided to go through it and now I am ready to share my thoughts with you. (It feels like I've written this before.) If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from this book? Before writing this review, I had a few candidates. I am always reading several books in parallel, and I have a number that I'm about to finish. So I asked the Twitter community for input on which book they would like me to review as number 50. And this came out on top. So far I have reviewed 49 books on #patzersreview . Which one should be number 50? My candidates are: - Silman: Reassess your chess workbook - Nunn: Solving in...

My system should be your system?

One of the greates classics of chess literature. That's at least what it says on the cover. But let's not judge a book by the cover. Instead, we could listen to what others have said about this book. In his review of My system , John Watson writes: "We no longer consider many classics to be essential to a chess education, not since the Internet; but if there’s an exception, Nimzowitch’s work is it". These are big words from a big man. Watson is an authority of chess theory, so his evaluation should not be taken too lightly. Although My system has frequently been mentioned among the greatest books of all time, and has been recommended by many players , it has also been the subject of controversy. Of course, when the book was first published (almost 100 years ago), many ideas in the book challenged many of the established principles of chess theory at the time, and other authorities dismissed the ideas. But also to this day, many people are unimpressed with the b...

Not only for kids

Do you read children's books? If you're and adult, you will probably steer clear of any book that has the phrase "for kids" in it. Since it's for kids, and you're not a kid. Right? Well there are some exceptions, and this is one of them. Author Jeff Coakley has written a number of books "for kids": Winning chess strategy for kids , Winning chess exercises for kids and Winning chess puzzles for kids (vol 1 and 2). Although the titles suggest otherwise, these books are highly instructive and useful for players of all ages. In this review, I have chosen to focus on the first book in his series, Winning chess strategy for kids . What can you expect from this book? Immediately when seeing this book, you will realize that there is one major feature that is "for kids", and that is the artwork. Apart from that, there is no reason to assume that this book cannot be used for adult improvers. I used this book as a part of my tactics training p...