Skip to main content

Chess for life

Would you like to know a fun fact? You know that online chess community that everyone is talking about? Back in the day, there were a few different suggestions for which hashtag we should use. As you all know, we arrived at the decision to use #ChessPunks, and the rest is history. But initially, this was not the leading suggestion. Instead, it was #Chess4Life, but for various reasons we had a new poll and got a different result. This has nothing to do with the book in this review, apart from the fact that they share the same name. But with slightly different conditions, we would have a thriving chess community with the same name as this book. That would have been a fun coincidence. So after this pointless introduction, you may have chosen to stop reading. But if, for some reason, you are still reading, I hope you enjoy this review.  

If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details.
Become a Patron!

What can you expect from this book?

Chess for life has the subtitle "Understanding how chess skills develop and change with the passage of time". When I first read this, I expected this to be a book about chess and aging in general. If you have made this same assumption, I can inform you that you would be precisely as wrong as I was. The book does cover the topic of aging related to chess skills, but in a rather narrow sense, with a focus on elite players. 

The book takes its starting point in a general discussion about how senior players maintain their playing strength and joy of playing. The book begins by stating three goals: (1) to examine how players are affected by age, (2) to identify techniques for coping with age-related changes, and (3) to demonstrate how players can "future-proof" their game.

The authors have chosen 13 players of which they paint a sort of chess portrait. They describe the players' lives and careers in chess and provide samples of their games.
  1. Pia Cramling
  2. John Nunn
  3. Jose Capablanca
  4. Judit Polgar
  5. Terry Chapman
  6. Jon Speelman
  7. Tony Miles
  8. Sergei Tiviakov
  9. Ingrid Lauterbach
  10. Nigel Short
  11. Nona Gaprindashvili
  12. Yasser Seirawan
  13. Keith Arkell
The book has a separate chapter for each player. The general structure of the chapters are similar. They start with a short biographical note that presents the player, which is then followed by an interview (of course, with the exception of the players that are no longer with us) and a recap of some of their most notable games. Some of the chapters end at that point, and others end with a short reflection and conclusion. 

The final chapter of the book gives a summary of all the conclusions from the interviews and game analyses in the previous chapters. Five topics are presented together with examples from each chapter:
  1. Enjoyment and motivation
  2. Training strategies
  3. Designing an opening repertoire with longevity
  4. Preparation for a game
  5. Practical approach at the board
These five topics are further summarized in the introduction of the book. 

I think the book does a good job at presenting the individual players along with their careers and how their approach to chess has changed over the years. One thing that seems a bit off is that some of the chapters contain various forms of analyses and statistics on their chosen openings. I am not really sure what to make of this, apart from seeing how certain players change their repertoires over time. However, this analysis is not provided in every chapter, which makes it hard to compare them to each other and draw general conclusions.

To my mind, this seems to reflect the fact that the book has two authors with slightly different perspectives on the content. This is not necessarily a bad thing, but it seems to generate a notable variation between the chapters.

The main topic of the book is the effects of aging related to chess abilities, but the topic is addressed in two different ways. First of all, the book gives the individual players' perspectives on this topic, and how they have developed as chess players over the years. Secondly, the game analyses provides some insight to which openings are playable at different ages. With increasing age, the players report a decreasing "sharpness" in calculation, which has made them steer away from the tactically sharp openings that they may have preferred at a younger age, and instead opt for more quiet and flexible setups. 

With this in mind, the book can be read in different ways. First of all, you can read it as a biography, simply to get to know the players and their careers. Secondly, you could read it to find inspiration for creating a repertoire of your own, based on one or more of the players that are presented in the book. Finally, you could read the book as a general discussion on aging and chess, which seems to be the main ambition of the authors.

As I indicated in the beginning of this review, I do not think the authors succeed in adressing the general question of chess and increasing age. The reason for this is the selection of players that are featured in the book. Since all of them are (or have been) at the elite level, the observations that are made in the book are not necessarily generalizable to the average club player. This being said, I still think the book has some interesting points that are worth noting, even for us mere mortals.

Who should read this book?

Chess for life is aimed at readers interested in various aspects of aging and chess. This indicates that the target audience consists of players who already have passed their "optimal" chess age (if there is such a thing) or players who want to shore up their chess for the years to come. The book can also be read as a biography and game collection, which means that it could be enjoyed by anyone.

About this book

Author:Matthew Sadler & Natasha Regan
Title:Chess for life
Type of book:Biography, Game collection
Level:Any
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular reviews

Under the surface

I did something different. I bought a chess book without doing any research. I decided to reward myself with a new book after having written ten reviews. So I asked my friends on Twitter for suggestions, and someone suggested that I take a look at the book Under the surface by Jan Markos. Since the book is quite new, I couldn't find much information about it, so I decided to blindly trust the recommendation. Luckily, I was not let down. What can you expect from this book? I am not the only one who has done something different. Jan Markos did the same when he wrote Under the surface . He takes a quite philosophical approach to chess, which should probably be expected from a former student of philosophy. This comes across quite clearly in his choice of chapter titles. The names "Magnetic Skin", "Anatoly Karpov's Billiard Balls" and "On the Breaking Ice" are not the most transparent chapter titles in the world. But once you get under the surfa...
Post a Comment
Read more

Learn chess tactics

Where should you turn for tactics training? This is a frequently occuring question, not only from beginners, but also from intermediate players. Which books are suitable for your specific level, and which ones should you get? In this review, I take on a book that I suggest you do get - at least if you're at or near the beginning of your chess development. This was actually my first tactics book back in the day, and I recently reread it in order to give a proper review. I remember that I liked it the first time around and that my tactical skills improved. Although rereading it didn't contribute all that much to my learning, I still have a good impression of it. Please read on for more details. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from this book? Learn Chess Tactics is written by the one and only John Nunn, and (as the name implies) it is a tactics book. I would go as f...
Post a Comment
Read more

Master of strategy

During the past two years, I’ve been working on improving my strategic/positional play. In this process, I have read a number of books, and two books that have long been on my reading list are the strategy books by Johan Hellsten. So when the Swedish chess federation requested reviewers for two of these books, I didn’t hesitate. I am happy that I was given the opportunity to review these books, and hope this review can be of help to you as a reader. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from these books? Johan Hellsten has created a name for himself as one of the leading experts of chess strategy in modern times. His series of strategy books ( Mastering Opening Strategy , Mastering Chess Strategy and Mastering Endgame Strategy ) have received glowing reviews from many parts of the chess world. So it feels good to finally dig into these nuggets. His endgame book is still in my boo...
Post a Comment
Read more

The best book for patzers?

I have been playing chess since I was a kid, but until about 10 years ago (2009), I had not even considered reading chess books. For some reason, this changed. I cannot remember why, but I decided I wanted to learn more about chess and probably pick up a book or two. I searched the Internet and consulted a few online chess forums, and was recommended the book The Amateur's Mind by Jeremy Silman. I bought the book, and that was the start of my growing collection of chess books. The Amateur's Mind has had a tremendous impact on my understanding of the game. Prior to Reading this book, I had no idea about how to evaluate a position or how to play the opening properly (or any other phase of the game, for that matter). I saw my results improving dramatically, and gained a couple of hundred rating points in just a few months. At this point, I only played online, so I did not have a "proper" rating. But regardless, I learned a lot from reading the book. What can y...
3 comments
Read more

Think first or think later? - part 1

This is a different kind of review. It's not just a review of one book, but two (actually three). Therefore, it's written in two parts, and this is part 1. I have chosen the book Move first, think later by Willy Hendriks and Understanding before moving by Herman Grooten (which is actually a series, with two books so far). The main reason I chose these books is that the titles indicate completely opposite views of how to approach chess: Think before you move or just move and think later. So how should a patzer like me make sense of this? I read the book on Forward Chess , which was a new experience for me. The service is available for various operative systems. I used the app on my iPad. One advantage is that it allows you to click through the variations instead of just visualizing them in your head. You can of course skip this, if you want to train your visualization skills. Another good thing is that you can try out various moves that are not in the book and switch on an ...
2 comments
Read more