Skip to main content

Dynamize your chess

Some books are worth waiting for, and this one is exceptional in terms of waiting. When I ordered the book, it took over 6 months before it was delivered. When I finally got around to reading it, I realized that I should probably read more basic books on chess strategy in order to get more context on this one. So I put it away for a while. The result is that it has taken almost two years from when I ordered the book until this review was done. Is it worth the wait? Read on to find out.

If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details.
Become a Patron! 

What can you expect from this book?

In How to study chess on your own, Davorin Kuljasevic recommends that you should "dynamize" your tactical training. Dynamic chess strategy is a good book to get you started on that track. And it is also one of the books that Kuljasevic references repeatedly throughout his book. But what exactly does it mean? Well, that's one of the main questions that this book aims to answer.

In this book, the term dynamic is used to describe the mobility, or potential energy, of the pieces. Plainly put, this means putting the pieces on squares where they can "do" something. Dynamic chess is thereby a matter of maximizing the pieces' potential, and dynamic chess strategy is a general approach for playing in this way. Suba describes the aim of dynamic chess strategy as "promoting fighting and uncompromising chess" (p. 60). 

According to Suba, the discourse around chess strategy is biased towards static factors such as key files and squares, space, and "good" vs "bad" pieces. In his opinion, the dynamic elements of chess strategy has been neglected. And according to Suba, the most important element of chess strategy is mobility. (Side note: This is, in fact, the same message that Michael Stean gave in his book Simple ChessIt's nice to see that there is agreement between books written for beginners and for advanced players.)

An indication of this bias is the somewhat artificial distinction between strategy and tactics. With a dynamic perspective on chess strategy, this line is blurred. Tactics is an important part of dynamic play, and could thus be seen as a part of strategy. Or as Suba phrases it (p. 94):
Strategy is not the opposite of tactics, it is the theory of tactics. (...) It gives pointers for discovering plans, and plans, in their turn, direct the moves in given positions.
In practical terms, dynamic chess means that we aim for positions with elastic and non-symmetrical structures and central control. Because of the sharp positions that tend to arise in dynamic chess, evaluation of time is also very important. This is an example of how the distinction between strategy and tactics can be blurry.

Although Suba questions a lot of the traditional texts on chess strategy, he does not criticize the principles that are presented by authors such as Steinitz, Nimzowitsch and Watson. He emphasizes that these principles are still valid and an important part of chess strategy, but that dynamic elements need to be added to the mix. The table below gives a few examples of dynamic vs static elements of strategy.

Dynamic elements Static elements
Development Material
Activity
Structure
Concentration of pieces
Weaknesses

In How to reassess your chess, Silman has brought dynamics and statics together as one of several imbalances that need to be considered. This is one example of how the discussion of chess strategy has (hopefully) evolved since Suba first wrote this book.

Suba also argues that chess strategy can easily be perceived as something abstract and difficult to grasp. His opinion is that strategy must be made more practical and concrete (p. 63):
Chess strategy must lose some of its grandness, some of its sentential character, must come back to earth and become practical, so that we can make it work for us move by move.
Suba's suggestion for achieving this is to see strategy as a continuous process rather than some mystical concept that involves the unbroken execution of a deep plan that is laid before the game starts. Suba describes three major functions of chess strategy:
  1. Positional evaluation
  2. Understanding plans and "weapons"; your own and your opponent's
  3. Establish a plan
This is a quite advanced book. Although I enjoyed it, I feel that I probably did not understand all of it to the extent Suba had intended. In the foreword, he writes that the book is aimed at player rated 1900 or above, but that it could be relevant for somewhat lower rated players if they have sufficient "chess culture".

Dynamic chess strategy is not a very big book. It has 195 pages distributed over 7 chapters (plus one with solutions). The book contains a mix of stories, 36 annotated games and a lot of philosophical discussions about chess strategy. In my opinion, the latter is what makes this a great book. Personally, I found chapters 3 and 4 to be the most interesting parts. Don't get me wrong, the rest is also interesting, but not more than any average games collection.

If you are looking for more details on this book, please take a look at the sample pages from the publisher.

Who should read this book?

Dynamic chess strategy is a book for advanced players. Before reading it, you should have a strong foundation in chess strategy, and you have probably read quite a bit about the subject before. In terms of playing strength, you are probably well above 1800. So if you have a solid understanding of chess strategy, and you want to broaden your perspective on the subject, then this is an excellent book. For beginners, and intermediate players, I suggest you make a note of this book and pick it up once you reach the appropriate level.

About this book

Author:Mihai Suba
Title:Dynamic chess strategy
Type of book:Middlegame, Strategy
Level:Advanced

Comments

Popular reviews

Lessons with a Grandmaster

If you had actual lessons with a grandmaster, would you be brave enough to publish the transcripts? Well, someone did. And that someone wrote about it in book form — three books, to be precise. In this review, I present my thoughts on the first book in the book series Lessons with a Grandmaster . If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron!   What can you expect from this book? Lessons with a GM  is written in collaboration between Boris Gulko and Joel Sneed. Gulko is a grandmaster who emigrated from the Soviet Union in the 1980s. According to Wikipedia, he is the only player to win the Soviet as well as US Chess championships. Sneed is a professor of psychology at Queens College in New York as well as an amateur player.  In essence, this book is a game collection. There are 25 games in the book, all played by Gulko. There are some real heavyweights among his opponents, such as Kasparov, Karpov,...

Master of strategy

During the past two years, I’ve been working on improving my strategic/positional play. In this process, I have read a number of books, and two books that have long been on my reading list are the strategy books by Johan Hellsten. So when the Swedish chess federation requested reviewers for two of these books, I didn’t hesitate. I am happy that I was given the opportunity to review these books, and hope this review can be of help to you as a reader. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from these books? Johan Hellsten has created a name for himself as one of the leading experts of chess strategy in modern times. His series of strategy books ( Mastering Opening Strategy , Mastering Chess Strategy and Mastering Endgame Strategy ) have received glowing reviews from many parts of the chess world. So it feels good to finally dig into these nuggets. His endgame book is still in my boo...

Think like a Super-GM

In my previous review I mentioned how I would like to see an improved version of The Improving Chess Thinker , and that a book had recently come out that seemed to be perfectly in line with my ideas. A few months later, I have bought the book, worked through the exercises and read the prose. And finally, I am ready to give my complete review of the new book Think like a Super-GM . And I can tell you, I was not disappointed by this book. Read on to find out why you should probably get the book too. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from this book? As the title indicates, Think like a Super-GM is a book about thinking in chess. At its core, it is a puzzle book. But it is more than that. In the chapters surrounding the puzzles, the book digs into the challenges of thinking in chess and how the thinking process differs between players of different levels. The first chapter ...

Chaos on the board

Have you ever felt tired of chess? Maybe you’ve been uninspired or perhaps you think it’s too much work. To paraphrase a famous movie: All work and no play makes you a dull person. If that is the case, I may have a cure. You need a fun chess book. Something that will rekindle your joy for the game and inspire you to play creatively. I give you Tiger’s Chaos Theory ! This book found me at a time when I needed it the most. My inspiration and motivation to study chess was way down. And like a bolt from the blue, the Swedish Chess Federation approached me and wanted me to review this book. And the kind people at Quality Chess agreed to send me a review copy. An offer I couldn't refuse. So after this happy turn of events, I have a new review for you. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from this book? Grandmaster Tiger Hillarp Persson, a multi-time Swedish chess champion, has al...

My system should be your system?

One of the greates classics of chess literature. That's at least what it says on the cover. But let's not judge a book by the cover. Instead, we could listen to what others have said about this book. In his review of My system , John Watson writes: "We no longer consider many classics to be essential to a chess education, not since the Internet; but if there’s an exception, Nimzowitch’s work is it". These are big words from a big man. Watson is an authority of chess theory, so his evaluation should not be taken too lightly. Although My system has frequently been mentioned among the greatest books of all time, and has been recommended by many players , it has also been the subject of controversy. Of course, when the book was first published (almost 100 years ago), many ideas in the book challenged many of the established principles of chess theory at the time, and other authorities dismissed the ideas. But also to this day, many people are unimpressed with the b...