The Queen's Gambit

The Queen's Gambit - accepted

Almost everyone has heard of Beth Harmon by now. The miniseries has been seen by millions of people around the world. But how many have read the book that the series is based on? Probably a lot fewer. Well, at least I am one of them. So I thought I'd share my impressions with you.

If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details.
Become a Patron!

What can you expect from this book?

The Queen's Gambit is a fictional story about Beth Harmon. Beth lost her parents as a small child, and was brought up in an orphanage. During her time there, she was taught how to play chess by the janitor. It soon became apparent that she had a tremendous talent, and her skills grew exponentially until she finally became a world class player.

The character Beth Harmon seems to be loosely based on the life of Bobby Fischer. They both share the same extraordinary talent which they honed more or less on their own. They were both American players, and their chess battles against the Russians had some political overtones. Another similarity is that both of them had some issues off the board. Fischer's mental health has been discussed extensively, and he has put forth a number of controversial statements on various topics. Beth Harmon has her own demons, and suffers from an alcohol and drug addiction. Despite their respective challenges, they both managed to ascend to the very peak of the chess world.

The Queen's Gambit is based on fictional characters. But there are a few real characters as well. The story is set in the 1950s and 60s, so some of the great players of that era make an appearance in the book. For instance, when Beth plays in a major tournament, the world champion Borgov is assisted by Tal and Petrosian. It is, however, strange that they don't play themselves. But that is another minor issue.

I saw the miniseries before I read the book, and I recognized a lot. The story line is identical, apart from some minor details. The scenes are also quite similar, even down to individual lines by the characters. But the two variations (pun intended) differ in terms of emphasis. The miniseries is focused more on the characters and their interactions. The chess is only used as a setting and doesn't get a whole lot of attention. The book is a kind of mirror image. The dialog and interaction between characters is described rather briefly, and focus is largely placed on the chess. For instance, the book may spend a sentence or two describing how the characters have sex and eat breakfast, followed by two pages describing a chess game.

Don't get me wrong. This doesn't make the book bad. It is just different from the series. The "action" that takes place on the board is portrayed very well, with a lot of examples of the inner dialog that Beth has when playing various people. Tevis has a curious way of telling the story of the games, where he mentions pieces and themes without providing the exact move sequence or position on the board. Here is an example:

She interposed a knight, threatening a check that would take the rook. He would have to move the king now and she would bring the queen over to the rook file.

I find this a bit intriguing. Tevis manages to capture the drama on the board without giving the reader the full picture. While it would be interesting to see the complete games, this kind of "sampling" enables the reader to follow along without getting lost in analysis. After all, this is not a games collection.

Who should read this book?

The Queen's Gambit is an entertaining book. It is written by a chess player, and seemingly for other chess players. It's a good read, but not exceptionally so. If you would like a version of the story with emphasis on the chess, then I'd recommend reading the book rather than watching the miniseries.

About this book

Author:	Walter Tevis
Title:	The Queen's Gambit
Type of book:	Book review, Miscellaneous, ~~Opening theory~~
Level:	N/A

Comments

Popular reviews

Master of strategy

During the past two years, I’ve been working on improving my strategic/positional play. In this process, I have read a number of books, and two books that have long been on my reading list are the strategy books by Johan Hellsten. So when the Swedish chess federation requested reviewers for two of these books, I didn’t hesitate. I am happy that I was given the opportunity to review these books, and hope this review can be of help to you as a reader. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from these books? Johan Hellsten has created a name for himself as one of the leading experts of chess strategy in modern times. His series of strategy books ( Mastering Opening Strategy , Mastering Chess Strategy and Mastering Endgame Strategy ) have received glowing reviews from many parts of the chess world. So it feels good to finally dig into these nuggets. His endgame book is still in my boo...

Lessons with a Grandmaster

If you had actual lessons with a grandmaster, would you be brave enough to publish the transcripts? Well, someone did. And that someone wrote about it in book form — three books, to be precise. In this review, I present my thoughts on the first book in the book series Lessons with a Grandmaster . If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from this book? Lessons with a GM is written in collaboration between Boris Gulko and Joel Sneed. Gulko is a grandmaster who emigrated from the Soviet Union in the 1980s. According to Wikipedia, he is the only player to win the Soviet as well as US Chess championships. Sneed is a professor of psychology at Queens College in New York as well as an amateur player. In essence, this book is a game collection. There are 25 games in the book, all played by Gulko. There are some real heavyweights among his opponents, such as Kasparov, Karpov,...

Think like a Super-GM

In my previous review I mentioned how I would like to see an improved version of The Improving Chess Thinker , and that a book had recently come out that seemed to be perfectly in line with my ideas. A few months later, I have bought the book, worked through the exercises and read the prose. And finally, I am ready to give my complete review of the new book Think like a Super-GM . And I can tell you, I was not disappointed by this book. Read on to find out why you should probably get the book too. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from this book? As the title indicates, Think like a Super-GM is a book about thinking in chess. At its core, it is a puzzle book. But it is more than that. In the chapters surrounding the puzzles, the book digs into the challenges of thinking in chess and how the thinking process differs between players of different levels. The first chapter ...

Chaos on the board

Have you ever felt tired of chess? Maybe you’ve been uninspired or perhaps you think it’s too much work. To paraphrase a famous movie: All work and no play makes you a dull person. If that is the case, I may have a cure. You need a fun chess book. Something that will rekindle your joy for the game and inspire you to play creatively. I give you Tiger’s Chaos Theory ! This book found me at a time when I needed it the most. My inspiration and motivation to study chess was way down. And like a bolt from the blue, the Swedish Chess Federation approached me and wanted me to review this book. And the kind people at Quality Chess agreed to send me a review copy. An offer I couldn't refuse. So after this happy turn of events, I have a new review for you. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from this book? Grandmaster Tiger Hillarp Persson, a multi-time Swedish chess champion, has al...

My system should be your system?

One of the greates classics of chess literature. That's at least what it says on the cover. But let's not judge a book by the cover. Instead, we could listen to what others have said about this book. In his review of My system , John Watson writes: "We no longer consider many classics to be essential to a chess education, not since the Internet; but if there’s an exception, Nimzowitch’s work is it". These are big words from a big man. Watson is an authority of chess theory, so his evaluation should not be taken too lightly. Although My system has frequently been mentioned among the greatest books of all time, and has been recommended by many players , it has also been the subject of controversy. Of course, when the book was first published (almost 100 years ago), many ideas in the book challenged many of the established principles of chess theory at the time, and other authorities dismissed the ideas. But also to this day, many people are unimpressed with the b...

Patzer's review

Search This Blog