The Queen's Gambit

The Queen's Gambit - accepted

Almost everyone has heard of Beth Harmon by now. The miniseries has been seen by millions of people around the world. But how many have read the book that the series is based on? Probably a lot fewer. Well, at least I am one of them. So I thought I'd share my impressions with you.

If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details.
Become a Patron!

What can you expect from this book?

The Queen's Gambit is a fictional story about Beth Harmon. Beth lost her parents as a small child, and was brought up in an orphanage. During her time there, she was taught how to play chess by the janitor. It soon became apparent that she had a tremendous talent, and her skills grew exponentially until she finally became a world class player.

The character Beth Harmon seems to be loosely based on the life of Bobby Fischer. They both share the same extraordinary talent which they honed more or less on their own. They were both American players, and their chess battles against the Russians had some political overtones. Another similarity is that both of them had some issues off the board. Fischer's mental health has been discussed extensively, and he has put forth a number of controversial statements on various topics. Beth Harmon has her own demons, and suffers from an alcohol and drug addiction. Despite their respective challenges, they both managed to ascend to the very peak of the chess world.

The Queen's Gambit is based on fictional characters. But there are a few real characters as well. The story is set in the 1950s and 60s, so some of the great players of that era make an appearance in the book. For instance, when Beth plays in a major tournament, the world champion Borgov is assisted by Tal and Petrosian. It is, however, strange that they don't play themselves. But that is another minor issue.

I saw the miniseries before I read the book, and I recognized a lot. The story line is identical, apart from some minor details. The scenes are also quite similar, even down to individual lines by the characters. But the two variations (pun intended) differ in terms of emphasis. The miniseries is focused more on the characters and their interactions. The chess is only used as a setting and doesn't get a whole lot of attention. The book is a kind of mirror image. The dialog and interaction between characters is described rather briefly, and focus is largely placed on the chess. For instance, the book may spend a sentence or two describing how the characters have sex and eat breakfast, followed by two pages describing a chess game.

Don't get me wrong. This doesn't make the book bad. It is just different from the series. The "action" that takes place on the board is portrayed very well, with a lot of examples of the inner dialog that Beth has when playing various people. Tevis has a curious way of telling the story of the games, where he mentions pieces and themes without providing the exact move sequence or position on the board. Here is an example:

She interposed a knight, threatening a check that would take the rook. He would have to move the king now and she would bring the queen over to the rook file.

I find this a bit intriguing. Tevis manages to capture the drama on the board without giving the reader the full picture. While it would be interesting to see the complete games, this kind of "sampling" enables the reader to follow along without getting lost in analysis. After all, this is not a games collection.

Who should read this book?

The Queen's Gambit is an entertaining book. It is written by a chess player, and seemingly for other chess players. It's a good read, but not exceptionally so. If you would like a version of the story with emphasis on the chess, then I'd recommend reading the book rather than watching the miniseries.

About this book

Author:	Walter Tevis
Title:	The Queen's Gambit
Type of book:	Book review, Miscellaneous, ~~Opening theory~~
Level:	N/A

Comments

Popular reviews

Under the surface

I did something different. I bought a chess book without doing any research. I decided to reward myself with a new book after having written ten reviews. So I asked my friends on Twitter for suggestions, and someone suggested that I take a look at the book Under the surface by Jan Markos. Since the book is quite new, I couldn't find much information about it, so I decided to blindly trust the recommendation. Luckily, I was not let down. What can you expect from this book? I am not the only one who has done something different. Jan Markos did the same when he wrote Under the surface . He takes a quite philosophical approach to chess, which should probably be expected from a former student of philosophy. This comes across quite clearly in his choice of chapter titles. The names "Magnetic Skin", "Anatoly Karpov's Billiard Balls" and "On the Breaking Ice" are not the most transparent chapter titles in the world. But once you get under the surfa...

Learn chess tactics

Where should you turn for tactics training? This is a frequently occuring question, not only from beginners, but also from intermediate players. Which books are suitable for your specific level, and which ones should you get? In this review, I take on a book that I suggest you do get - at least if you're at or near the beginning of your chess development. This was actually my first tactics book back in the day, and I recently reread it in order to give a proper review. I remember that I liked it the first time around and that my tactical skills improved. Although rereading it didn't contribute all that much to my learning, I still have a good impression of it. Please read on for more details. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from this book? Learn Chess Tactics is written by the one and only John Nunn, and (as the name implies) it is a tactics book. I would go as f...

Master of strategy

During the past two years, I’ve been working on improving my strategic/positional play. In this process, I have read a number of books, and two books that have long been on my reading list are the strategy books by Johan Hellsten. So when the Swedish chess federation requested reviewers for two of these books, I didn’t hesitate. I am happy that I was given the opportunity to review these books, and hope this review can be of help to you as a reader. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from these books? Johan Hellsten has created a name for himself as one of the leading experts of chess strategy in modern times. His series of strategy books ( Mastering Opening Strategy , Mastering Chess Strategy and Mastering Endgame Strategy ) have received glowing reviews from many parts of the chess world. So it feels good to finally dig into these nuggets. His endgame book is still in my boo...

The best book for patzers?

I have been playing chess since I was a kid, but until about 10 years ago (2009), I had not even considered reading chess books. For some reason, this changed. I cannot remember why, but I decided I wanted to learn more about chess and probably pick up a book or two. I searched the Internet and consulted a few online chess forums, and was recommended the book The Amateur's Mind by Jeremy Silman. I bought the book, and that was the start of my growing collection of chess books. The Amateur's Mind has had a tremendous impact on my understanding of the game. Prior to Reading this book, I had no idea about how to evaluate a position or how to play the opening properly (or any other phase of the game, for that matter). I saw my results improving dramatically, and gained a couple of hundred rating points in just a few months. At this point, I only played online, so I did not have a "proper" rating. But regardless, I learned a lot from reading the book. What can y...

Think first or think later? - part 1

This is a different kind of review. It's not just a review of one book, but two (actually three). Therefore, it's written in two parts, and this is part 1. I have chosen the book Move first, think later by Willy Hendriks and Understanding before moving by Herman Grooten (which is actually a series, with two books so far). The main reason I chose these books is that the titles indicate completely opposite views of how to approach chess: Think before you move or just move and think later. So how should a patzer like me make sense of this? I read the book on Forward Chess , which was a new experience for me. The service is available for various operative systems. I used the app on my iPad. One advantage is that it allows you to click through the variations instead of just visualizing them in your head. You can of course skip this, if you want to train your visualization skills. Another good thing is that you can try out various moves that are not in the book and switch on an ...

Patzer's review

Search This Blog