Simple attacking plans

“I had a fantastic position, but I couldn’t figure out what to do next!” Sound familiar? If so, then Fred Wilson’s Simple Attacking Plans was written for you. That is what is written on the back cover of this book, and that is basically what got me sold on it in the first place. After having the book on my reading list for several years, I finally decided to read it.

If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details.
Become a Patron!

What can you expect from this book?

When I first heard about this book (probably on The Perpetual Chess Podcast), I was excited. I thought it would be exactly what I needed - a book that gives me a few simple recipes that I can follow in attacking. That was not the case. The book does provide a few general tips, but they are not very detailed. Here is a (very brief) summary:

Attack f2 or f7
Attack h2 or h7
With a king in the center, open and dominate the central files
Point all of your pieces at your opponent's king

If you've played any chess at all, you will probably recognize these "plans". They are neither concrete nor complex. It's far from enough to build a strategy. But the book does have more to offer.

Simple Attacking Plans is basically a games collection. The theme is (as the title indicates) attacking chess. It has six chapters, but two of them are named "selected games" and "more selected games". Apart from these, there are chapters on "the greek gift", "attacking a fianchetto castled position" and a discussion of the proper names of tactical themes (deflection, undemining, removing the guard). My impression is that author Fred Wilson could have done a bit more with the overall structure and the chapter names - to help the reader extract all the goodness from the selected games. There are important lessons to be learned here, but if you want them, you have to work for it!

Each chapter contains a number of annotated games. All of them are (of course) attacking games, and most of them end in a wonderful combination. The position on the front cover (Browne vs Bellon 1977) is an example that is featured in the introduction chapter. It is a fantastic attacking game. And the book has 36 other such games.

Each game is well annotated. Usually, there's only some general comment about the opening (the name, and a general assessment). However, the focus is on mistakes that are made from one of the players, and how the other player exploits those mistakes.

One thing that I like about the book is that it doesn't give away everything directly. Wilson does encourage the reader to engage in the material and try to find the critical moves in key positions. For instance, when we arrive at the position on the front cover, Wilson asks: "Now how did Browne conclude his attacking gem?". The move is given on the front cover, but why does it work? I won't give it away here. If you can't find it, you'll have to get the book (or DM me).

One thing that I don't like about the book is (as indicated above) the overall structure. It is basically a collection of attacking games, albeit with good annotations. But with such a title, I had expected more clearly outlined attacking plans. Don't get be wrong. The book does provide many examples (37 games) of various ways to attack. It illustrates how the win is executed in all the sample games. But it does not help the reader to extract the basic principles that underpin these attacks. So if you're looking for something along those lines, I would say that The Art of Attack in Chess by Vukovic is a much better choice.

I think Simple Attacking Plans is a nice little book with interesting attacking games. There is something to be learned from each game, but it is not my favorite book on the topic. If you are looking for spectacular attacking games, I think Instructive Chess Miniatures is an excellent choice. The games are equally (or more) exciting, the annotation are equally good, and there are more games. If you are looking for some kind of manual for how to conduct an attack, I think The Art of Attack in Chess is a good place to start.

Who should read this book?

Simple Attacking Plans is a nice little book with a good collection of attacking games. I think this is a good introduction for players who are looking to dip their toes into the waters of attacking chess. The book is probably best suited for players with a strength between 1200 and 1600.

About this book

Author:	Fred Wilson
Title:	Simple Attacking Plans
Type of book:	Book review, Game collection, Middlegame, Tactics
Level:	Beginner/Intermediate

Comments

Popular reviews

Master of strategy

During the past two years, I’ve been working on improving my strategic/positional play. In this process, I have read a number of books, and two books that have long been on my reading list are the strategy books by Johan Hellsten. So when the Swedish chess federation requested reviewers for two of these books, I didn’t hesitate. I am happy that I was given the opportunity to review these books, and hope this review can be of help to you as a reader. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from these books? Johan Hellsten has created a name for himself as one of the leading experts of chess strategy in modern times. His series of strategy books ( Mastering Opening Strategy , Mastering Chess Strategy and Mastering Endgame Strategy ) have received glowing reviews from many parts of the chess world. So it feels good to finally dig into these nuggets. His endgame book is still in my boo...

Rapid chess improvement

Would you like to gain 400 rating points in 400 days? That is what Michael de la Maza did. And he wrote a book about his progress and the methods that got him there. Quite an appealing idea, and many players at the beginner and intermediate level will be enticed. I was. Are you? In 2001, Michael de la Maza wrote an article in Chess horizons called "400 points in 400 days" . In the article, he outlines the main components of his training program and gives a short account of his own progress. He managed to to get from about 1300 to 2000 in just two years, which is quite an accomplishment. His ideas were later elaborated upon and presented in the book Rapid chess improvement. This book was published quite a few years ago, and can be difficult to find. But it has been republished in a new form, together with two other books in A chess course: from beginner to winner . If you decide you want to buy Rapid chess improvement , this three-in-one volume may be a good option. ...

Estimating playing strength

Have you ever felt like your chess rating doesn't represent your actual playing strength? Sometimes we want to be able to estimate playing strength based on individual games rather than rating (which changes more slowly). During the past few months, I've been taking a number of online courses and learning python for data analysis. In one of the courses, the final project allowed me to choose my own dataset. So surprise surprise! I chose something chess related. (Not really surprised, are you?) When we play games online, getting a computer evaluation is just a few clicks away. And a commonly used statistic is the average centipawn loss, or simply the average deviation from the computer's best move. Many of us tend to think that centipawn loss (CPL) is a good estimate of playing strength. And, of course, it gives some indication, but it's far from a perfect predictor. Fellow chess/statistics blogger Patrick Coulombe has investigated the correlation between rating and CPL ...

Attack the king

One of the finest chess books ever written. Those are tall words from the back cover of this classic book. But The art of attack in chess is one of those books that keep popping up in lists of best chess books. It is highly regarded by many players and trainers, so the initial statement is probably not all wrong. This is a book that has been on my reading list for several years, but it has taken some time for me to actually pick it up. I've been curious about what the hype is all about, and now that I've finally found out for myself, I am ready to share that insight with you. So let's dive in! What can you expect from this book? Before we begin, let me just get one detail out of the way. One thing that struck me when I picked up the book is the title, which seems to be missing a "the". When reading about the book online, it is referred to both with and without "the". When I looked up the original book (this one is a revised edition, edited by Joh...

My system should be your system?

One of the greates classics of chess literature. That's at least what it says on the cover. But let's not judge a book by the cover. Instead, we could listen to what others have said about this book. In his review of My system , John Watson writes: "We no longer consider many classics to be essential to a chess education, not since the Internet; but if there’s an exception, Nimzowitch’s work is it". These are big words from a big man. Watson is an authority of chess theory, so his evaluation should not be taken too lightly. Although My system has frequently been mentioned among the greatest books of all time, and has been recommended by many players , it has also been the subject of controversy. Of course, when the book was first published (almost 100 years ago), many ideas in the book challenged many of the established principles of chess theory at the time, and other authorities dismissed the ideas. But also to this day, many people are unimpressed with the b...

Patzer's review

Search This Blog