Skip to main content

Out of tune?

Have you ever missed a tactic in your games? Of course you have. We all have. Wouldn't it be good if someone wrote a book that could help you get better at spotting tactics? Well, there is such a book. Actually, there are many such books. And one example is Tune your chess tactics antenna by Emmanuel Neiman.

I'd like to warn sensitive readers, as this review may contain sarcasm. You have been warned.

What can you expect from this book?

As you probably know, there are hundreds and hundreds of tactics books out there, and most of them are pretty similar. Usually, a tactics book is divided into themes (pins, forks, skewers etc.), and the author explains each theme and then there are a bunch of puzzles for you to solve. Sound familiar?

In Tune your chess tactics antenna, you will find a similar component, but that is not all. In the first part of the book, the author presents seven signals that a tactic might be present.
  1. Weak king position
  2. Unprotected piece(s)
  3. Alignment (pieces on the same rank, file or diagonal)
  4. Knight fork distance
  5. Trapped piece(s)
  6. Crucial or overloaded defender
  7. Impotent defence, or defence too far away
So far, so good. A similar construct is presented by Dan Heisman in his Novice Nook article Seeds of tactical destruction (also found in A guide to chess improvement). Heisman gives a list that largely overlaps Neiman's seven signals: 
  1. Open enemy lines for Rooks, Queens, and Bishops to your King
  2. Loose (unguarded) pieces - "Loose Pieces Drop Off" = LPDO
  3. Pinned or "skewerable" pieces along the same rank, file, or diagonal
  4. Pieces (or squares) vulnerable to Knight forks
  5. Pieces that have little mobility and might easily be trapped if attacked
  6. Overworked pieces (pieces guarding more than one piece or square)
  7. A large domination of one side's forces in one area of the board
  8. Pieces that can easily be attacked by enemy pieces of less value
  9. One or more pieces than can be attacked via a "discovered attack"
  10. Weak back rank
  11. Inadequately guarded pieces
  12. Falling way behind in development (overwhelming opponent forces)
  13. Pawns nearing promotion
  14. King uncastled or lost pawn protection with Queens on the board

The fact that the two authors agree is a good sign. Points 1-7 are more or less the same as above, but Heisman's list goes on to mention seven additional points. He also says that it is possible to come up with even more. Although Heisman presents a more exhaustive list of "signals" or "seeds", I think that seven is a reasonable number for a book like this. It is difficult enough to remember all seven, not to mention 14 or more! So far, I like the book.

Another aspect of of the book that sets it apart from others on the market is that the examples and puzzles are presented in context. That is, the author presents the entire game up to the puzzle position, and the solution (for the most part) presents all the remaining moves. The rationale for this approach is "to get closer to the actual game situation" (p. 23). While this may be a good ambition, I doubt that very many readers will play through all the moves. One example gives 118 (!) moves before we arrive at the puzzle position. For the most part, this will not necessarily yield much more than simply studying the diagram. But for the ambitious reader, it may be a useful addition.

I have one major issue with this book. And it has to do with the pedagogical orientation. Some explanations are quite difficult to follow, such as the "swing door" tactic, which I will not even try to describe. Furthermore, I feel that the choice of examples/puzzles is quite off at times. For examples under the theme/signal knight fork distance, there are examples in which there is no knight fork! Wait, what? How does that help me understand the concept??

Also, some tactics are a bit over the top, and at least for me personally, the point is lost. Let me show one example. The theme here is weak king position.

White to move
The weak king position allows you to deflect a crucial defender (f6-knight) which allows a double bishop sacrifice that leads to mate - almost. The problem is the queen can interpose, leading to a position in which white is down a rook and two pieces for a queen. But there is a queen fork at the end, which wins a bishop. Basic stuff. The king position should tip you off, right? And now, of course, you see the whole solution. In case you don't, the whole line is presented below.

1. Nh5 Nxh5 2. Bxh7+ Kxh7 3. Qxh5+ Kg8 4. Bxg7 Kxg7 5. Qg4+ Kh7 6. Rf3 e5 7. Rh3+ Qh6 8. Rxh6+ Kxh6 9. Qd7

There are several examples like this in the book. To my mind, it is a rather unpedagogical way to present the ideas that the author wants to get across. Sure, these may be good exercises, but they are not the most illustrative examples.

My impression of the book is summarized quite well by a reviewer on Amazon: "It's a great idea: train your brain to recognize clues in chess positions that will alert you to various tactical possibilities. But I was very disappointed in the examples used. The tactical clues being illustrated are hidden so deep inside the games that they would never jump out at you. And there are other tactical signals hidden in the same games which aren't pointed out at all."

Another Amazon reviewer wrote: "The people who are giving this two stars either didn't read it right or are brain dead when it comes to chess."

I don't know which of these statements are true for me. Maybe I am braindead, but I definitely feel that this book does not quite deliver. The fundamental logic and ambition of the book is great, but the execution is off. I know that there are people out there that will disagree strongly, but I don't think it is a very good book. Something is out of tune, whether it is my reading/ability or the author's presentation of the material. As the guy said in the movie Notting Hill: There is something wrong with this yoghurt.

Who should read this book

Tune your chess tactics antenna is a book that is difficult to pin down in terms of intended audience. There is a wide range of tactics, from basic mating patterns to very advanced problems that are ten moves deep. Although this might indicate that the book is suitable for beginners (and up), I would say that it is in fact not. Sure, parts of the book are aimed at beginners, but for players at that level, there are far more suitable books out there. Instead, I would say that this is a book for fairly advanced players. In terms of rating, I would guess that you'd get the most out of the book if your playing strength is above 1700 Elo. But as indicated above, there are better tactics books out there.

About this book

Author:Emmanuel Neiman
Title:Tune your chess tactics antenna
Type of book:Tactics
Level:Intermediate/Advanced

Comments

Popular reviews

Rapid chess improvement

Would you like to gain 400 rating points in 400 days? That is what Michael de la Maza did. And he wrote a book about his progress and the methods that got him there. Quite an appealing idea, and many players at the beginner and intermediate level will be enticed. I was. Are you? In 2001, Michael de la Maza wrote an article in Chess horizons called "400 points in 400 days" . In the article, he outlines the main components of his training program and gives a short account of his own progress. He managed to to get from about 1300 to 2000 in just two years, which is quite an accomplishment. His ideas were later elaborated upon and presented in the book  Rapid chess improvement. This book was published quite a few years ago, and can be difficult to find. But it has been republished in a new form, together with two other books in A chess course: from beginner to winner . If you decide you want to buy Rapid chess improvement , this three-in-one volume may be a good option. ...

Estimating playing strength

Have you ever felt like your chess rating doesn't represent your actual playing strength? Sometimes we want to be able to estimate playing strength based on individual games rather than rating (which changes more slowly). During the past few months, I've been taking a number of online courses and learning python for data analysis. In one of the courses, the final project allowed me to choose my own dataset. So surprise surprise! I chose something chess related. (Not really surprised, are you?) When we play games online, getting a computer evaluation is just a few clicks away. And a commonly used statistic is the average centipawn loss, or simply the average deviation from the computer's best move. Many of us tend to think that centipawn loss (CPL) is a good estimate of playing strength. And, of course, it gives some indication, but it's far from a perfect predictor. Fellow chess/statistics blogger Patrick Coulombe has investigated the correlation between rating and CPL ...

Master of strategy

During the past two years, I’ve been working on improving my strategic/positional play. In this process, I have read a number of books, and two books that have long been on my reading list are the strategy books by Johan Hellsten. So when the Swedish chess federation requested reviewers for two of these books, I didn’t hesitate. I am happy that I was given the opportunity to review these books, and hope this review can be of help to you as a reader. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from these books? Johan Hellsten has created a name for himself as one of the leading experts of chess strategy in modern times. His series of strategy books ( Mastering Opening Strategy , Mastering Chess Strategy and Mastering Endgame Strategy ) have received glowing reviews from many parts of the chess world. So it feels good to finally dig into these nuggets. His endgame book is still in my boo...

Winning chess strategies

Chess strategy is one of the most elusive and difficult parts of chess. Compared to the direct and transparent world of chess tactics, strategy can be confusing and opaque. At the patzer level, tactical strikes that gain material or lead to checkmate can be obvious (provided that one understands the tactic). However, in many cases, strong players claim that a move is obvious although it doesn't result in material gain or even a semblance of an attack. We, the patzers of the world, scratch our heads and wonder how on earth anyone can find such moves obvious. How can we take steps towards this deeper level of chess understanding? Picking up a basic strategy book is a good first step. And that's what I did here. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from this book? As a part of my ambition to deepen my understanding of chess strategy, I took on a mission of reading (and rev...

Attack the king

One of the finest chess books ever written. Those are tall words from the back cover of this classic book. But The art of attack in chess is one of those books that keep popping up in lists of best chess books. It is highly regarded by many players and trainers, so the initial statement is probably not all wrong. This is a book that has been on my reading list for several years, but it has taken some time for me to actually pick it up. I've been curious about what the hype is all about, and now that I've finally found out for myself, I am ready to share that insight with you. So let's dive in! What can you expect from this book? Before we begin, let me just get one detail out of the way. One thing that struck me when I picked up the book is the title, which seems to be missing a "the". When reading about the book online, it is referred to both with and without "the". When I looked up the original book (this one is a revised edition, edited by Joh...