Skip to main content

What it takes

Let me be honest; I fell for the title.
It sort of promises to take your game to the next level, doesn't it? Also, I have read a few books by Andrew Soltis, and I think he is a great writer. That combination is hard to resist.

I first heard about another book by Soltis that has a very similar title: What it takes to become a grandmaster. Someone had given it a good review, so I was curious. I looked it up and found this one as well. I bought both of them.

I spent about a week reading the book, and I have enjoyed it more and more. It is very instructive and well written.

What can you expect from this book?

This book will not make you a chess master. If you think so, you'll probably be disappointed. What it will do, is point to certain factors that characterize players at the master level and thereby indicate what you need to work on.

The book presents nine such factors that make up chapters in the book. Examples of such factors are "winnability" and understanding compensation. Each chapter begins with a brief explanation of the factor at hand, and gives a few examples of their application in actual games. The examples are given in the form of positions where the players have difficult decisions to make. The positions are usually evaluated at a superficial level, followed by a deeper analysis. Finally, the actual moves are provided along with comments and variations.

The moves are annotated in a clear and no-nonsense manner, and variations are provided where necessary. Comments such as "it is easy to see that..." or "obviously, the best move is..." are nowhere to be found in this book, indicating that Soltis has written this book specifically for intermediate players.

All chapters conclude with a handful of exercises. In total, the book has 52 exercises. The solutions provided at the end of the book have short annotations in addition to the moves.

Who should read this book?

This is not a book for beginners. In order to get the most out of this book, you should have a strong tactical foundation and a fair grasp of the fundamentals of positional play. Perhaps you have reached a plateau and are wondering why you can't seem to make that next improvement step. Or perhaps you are wondering what separates you from the strongest players in your club. In terms of playing strength, your rating is probably between 1500 and 2000 FIDE. If this sounds familiar, then this might be a book for you.

About this book

Author:Andrew Soltis
Title:What it takes to become a Chess Master
Type of book:Middlegame
Level:Intermediate
Labels:

Comments

  1. UnknownApril 22, 2019 at 10:24 AM

    I am enjoying ur reviews can you do 1 for my favourite book # invisible chess moves by yochanan

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular reviews

Judgement and planning

Some books "fly under the radar" and do not get the same attention as the evergreen classics. But sometimes, there is gold in old mines. And I found a little golden nugget while shopping for used books. A book written for amateurs, by (arguably) the best amateur of all time; former world champion Max Euwe. Sounds promising, right? If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from this book? In my previous review of Chess Fundamentals , said that few world champions have written books for beginners and intermediate players. Capablanca is, of course, one exception. And another is Max Euwe. Euwe is not the most well-known world champion. He was in his prime in the 1930s and 1940s, most notably in 1935 when he dethroned none other than the great Alexander Alekhine. Although many have suggested that Alekhine only lost because of heavy use of alcohol, beating him is no small feat (rega...
Post a Comment
Read more

Nunn’s secrets

Let me tell you a secret. There is no such thing as 'the best chess books'. It all depends on the preferences and expectations of the reader and of course the work s/he puts in when working with the book. So just because someone else claims that a certain book belongs in the 'best books of all time' category, it does not necessarily mean that it is a book that you will appreciate. This little intro may have given away the content of this review, but that's ok. Secrets of practical chess is an example of a book that has gotten a lot of praise on a more than one occasion. So let's dig in and see what the fuss is all about. What can you expect from this book? Secrets of practical chess has seemingly been well received in the chess world. Overall, the opinions are very positive. John Watson gave it a very positive review , and Jacob Aagaard has listed it among the top 10 books of the 20th century . It is also mentioned in another list of 'best' books ....
Post a Comment
Read more

Thoughts on chess improvement

I was recently interviewed by Kevin Scull  for his podcast  Chess Journeys: Tales of Adult Improvement . When I got the request, I started thinking about what I have to contribute with in terms of improvement advice for chess players. I ended up creating a mindmap of it all, and thought I would share it with you along with an elaboration of what it means. Three questions for you In my opinion, there are three main questions that you need to ask yourself in order to find your  path to chess improvement: Why am I doing this? What will I focus on? How will I study? I have tried (and failed) myself, many times. And what I've realized is that you cannot copy other people's plans for improvement; you need to create a personalized plan that is adapted to your goals, your needs and your general life situation. Don't copy other people's improvement plans Start with WHY I've seen a lot of adult players describe their chess goals. Almost all of them are defined in...
2 comments
Read more

Understanding middlegames

Have you ever found yourself unable to find a move in the middlegame? Of course you have. We all have. About ten years ago, this was a recurring problem for me, which led to a lot of frustration. My conclusion was that I needed to learn how understand middlegames. So what better way than to read a book with the title Understanding Chess Middlegames ? Sound like the perfect remedy, right? Ok, let's find out. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron!   What can you expect from this book? I first read this book when I was just starting to study chess seriously. I bought it after reading a recommendation in an online forum. I would say this was ten years ago, but the book came out 2011, so it couldn't have been before that. Anyhow, my playing strength was probably around 1200 (I was unrated at the time) and I was having trouble choosing moves in non-tactical positions. Basically, I was playing without ...
1 comment
Read more

Estimating playing strength

Have you ever felt like your chess rating doesn't represent your actual playing strength? Sometimes we want to be able to estimate playing strength based on individual games rather than rating (which changes more slowly). During the past few months, I've been taking a number of online courses and learning python for data analysis. In one of the courses, the final project allowed me to choose my own dataset. So surprise surprise! I chose something chess related. (Not really surprised, are you?) When we play games online, getting a computer evaluation is just a few clicks away. And a commonly used statistic is the average centipawn loss, or simply the average deviation from the computer's best move. Many of us tend to think that centipawn loss (CPL) is a good estimate of playing strength. And, of course, it gives some indication, but it's far from a perfect predictor. Fellow chess/statistics blogger Patrick Coulombe has investigated the correlation between rating and CPL ...
Post a Comment
Read more