Skip to main content

What it takes

Let me be honest; I fell for the title.
It sort of promises to take your game to the next level, doesn't it? Also, I have read a few books by Andrew Soltis, and I think he is a great writer. That combination is hard to resist.

I first heard about another book by Soltis that has a very similar title: What it takes to become a grandmaster. Someone had given it a good review, so I was curious. I looked it up and found this one as well. I bought both of them.

I spent about a week reading the book, and I have enjoyed it more and more. It is very instructive and well written.

What can you expect from this book?

This book will not make you a chess master. If you think so, you'll probably be disappointed. What it will do, is point to certain factors that characterize players at the master level and thereby indicate what you need to work on.

The book presents nine such factors that make up chapters in the book. Examples of such factors are "winnability" and understanding compensation. Each chapter begins with a brief explanation of the factor at hand, and gives a few examples of their application in actual games. The examples are given in the form of positions where the players have difficult decisions to make. The positions are usually evaluated at a superficial level, followed by a deeper analysis. Finally, the actual moves are provided along with comments and variations.

The moves are annotated in a clear and no-nonsense manner, and variations are provided where necessary. Comments such as "it is easy to see that..." or "obviously, the best move is..." are nowhere to be found in this book, indicating that Soltis has written this book specifically for intermediate players.

All chapters conclude with a handful of exercises. In total, the book has 52 exercises. The solutions provided at the end of the book have short annotations in addition to the moves.

Who should read this book?

This is not a book for beginners. In order to get the most out of this book, you should have a strong tactical foundation and a fair grasp of the fundamentals of positional play. Perhaps you have reached a plateau and are wondering why you can't seem to make that next improvement step. Or perhaps you are wondering what separates you from the strongest players in your club. In terms of playing strength, your rating is probably between 1500 and 2000 FIDE. If this sounds familiar, then this might be a book for you.

About this book

Author:Andrew Soltis
Title:What it takes to become a Chess Master
Type of book:Middlegame
Level:Intermediate

Comments

  1. I am enjoying ur reviews can you do 1 for my favourite book # invisible chess moves by yochanan

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular reviews

Chaos on the board

Have you ever felt tired of chess? Maybe you’ve been uninspired or perhaps you think it’s too much work. To paraphrase a famous movie: All work and no play makes you a dull person. If that is the case, I may have a cure. You need a fun chess book. Something that will rekindle your joy for the game and inspire you to play creatively. I give you Tiger’s Chaos Theory ! This book found me at a time when I needed it the most. My inspiration and motivation to study chess was way down. And like a bolt from the blue, the Swedish Chess Federation approached me and wanted me to review this book. And the kind people at Quality Chess agreed to send me a review copy. An offer I couldn't refuse. So after this happy turn of events, I have a new review for you. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from this book? Grandmaster Tiger Hillarp Persson, a multi-time Swedish chess champion, has al...

Master of strategy

During the past two years, I’ve been working on improving my strategic/positional play. In this process, I have read a number of books, and two books that have long been on my reading list are the strategy books by Johan Hellsten. So when the Swedish chess federation requested reviewers for two of these books, I didn’t hesitate. I am happy that I was given the opportunity to review these books, and hope this review can be of help to you as a reader. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from these books? Johan Hellsten has created a name for himself as one of the leading experts of chess strategy in modern times. His series of strategy books ( Mastering Opening Strategy , Mastering Chess Strategy and Mastering Endgame Strategy ) have received glowing reviews from many parts of the chess world. So it feels good to finally dig into these nuggets. His endgame book is still in my boo...

Rapid chess improvement

Would you like to gain 400 rating points in 400 days? That is what Michael de la Maza did. And he wrote a book about his progress and the methods that got him there. Quite an appealing idea, and many players at the beginner and intermediate level will be enticed. I was. Are you? In 2001, Michael de la Maza wrote an article in Chess horizons called "400 points in 400 days" . In the article, he outlines the main components of his training program and gives a short account of his own progress. He managed to to get from about 1300 to 2000 in just two years, which is quite an accomplishment. His ideas were later elaborated upon and presented in the book  Rapid chess improvement. This book was published quite a few years ago, and can be difficult to find. But it has been republished in a new form, together with two other books in A chess course: from beginner to winner . If you decide you want to buy Rapid chess improvement , this three-in-one volume may be a good option. ...

Estimating playing strength

Have you ever felt like your chess rating doesn't represent your actual playing strength? Sometimes we want to be able to estimate playing strength based on individual games rather than rating (which changes more slowly). During the past few months, I've been taking a number of online courses and learning python for data analysis. In one of the courses, the final project allowed me to choose my own dataset. So surprise surprise! I chose something chess related. (Not really surprised, are you?) When we play games online, getting a computer evaluation is just a few clicks away. And a commonly used statistic is the average centipawn loss, or simply the average deviation from the computer's best move. Many of us tend to think that centipawn loss (CPL) is a good estimate of playing strength. And, of course, it gives some indication, but it's far from a perfect predictor. Fellow chess/statistics blogger Patrick Coulombe has investigated the correlation between rating and CPL ...

Winning chess strategies

Chess strategy is one of the most elusive and difficult parts of chess. Compared to the direct and transparent world of chess tactics, strategy can be confusing and opaque. At the patzer level, tactical strikes that gain material or lead to checkmate can be obvious (provided that one understands the tactic). However, in many cases, strong players claim that a move is obvious although it doesn't result in material gain or even a semblance of an attack. We, the patzers of the world, scratch our heads and wonder how on earth anyone can find such moves obvious. How can we take steps towards this deeper level of chess understanding? Picking up a basic strategy book is a good first step. And that's what I did here. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from this book? As a part of my ambition to deepen my understanding of chess strategy, I took on a mission of reading (and rev...