Skip to main content

An incomplete bible

A few months ago, I was planning an endgame course at my local club. I based my course almost entirely on Silman's endgame course, but I wanted to include a bishop+knight mate, which Silman doesn't cover. And accidentally, I stumbled across a book which does cover this endgame. So I decided to take a closer look at the rest of it as well. What I found out is that the book has many other interesting topics, but I have some quibbles about the title. Read on to see why.
 
If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details.
Become a Patron!

What can you expect from this book?

The tactics bible is not your typical tactics book. Most tactics books are very heavy on puzzles, and only contain short descriptions of tactical themes. This book is the diametrical opposite. There are no traditional puzzles in the book. Instead, the book puts emphasis on examples and explanations.

In the first two chapters, Grivas presents 133 examples of games where tactics play an important role. The book starts off with the most famous games, such as the 'immortal game' (Anderssen - Kieseritzky 1851) and the 'evergreen game' (Anderssen - Dufresne 1852). The second chapter contains the majority of the games. These are sorted by – in my opinion – quite arbitrary themes, such as "the king hunt" and "defence & counter attack". The games are instructive an well annotated. But the author could just as well have used the same number of pages to present "traditional" tactics and puzzles. I am not sure if this decision is brilliant or questionable. Either way, it is decision that puts this book apart from other books.

The remaining chapters focus entirely on checkmate patterns. Chapter 3 describes the proper execution of "theoretical" checkmates (e.g. two rooks, king+queen, king+rook, two bishops, bishop+knight). Chapter 4 and 5 don't describe methods as such, but rather presents various checkmate patterns. The chapters contain about 30 named checkmate themes (e.g. Arabian mate, Greco's mate, hook mate etc).  For some reason, the presentation is divided into two chapters (Ch 4: mates with heavy pieces, Ch 5: mates with minor pieces and pawns). The mating patterns are presented one by one in subsequent sections. They are first given a brief presentation followed by a few examples from games and studies. For me, these two chapters make up the best part of the book. I find it quite useful to be able to look up the name of a mating pattern and find a number of examples. However — as the author states — the names do not really matter. But I find that it can knowing the names can sometimes help the conversation about mating patterns and assist memory.

With a book title like this, expectations will be high. For me personally, I expect 'the bible' to be the definitive resource on the topic at hand. So when picking up this book, I expect it to be a one-stop guide to tactics. Unfortunately, this is not the case. The book does discuss a lot of tactics, but not the most common tactical patterns that most of us are used to (e.g. pins, forks and skewers). For me, this seems like a major omission for a book with such a bold title. Some may argue that showing tactical games (which the book does) is a better idea. I am a bit undecided on this question.

Also, for a book with such emphasis on sample games, I find it peculiar that there is no reference section or a list of players/games. So if you're looking for a particular game, you'll have to flip through the entire chapter. This is not a major issue, but another unusual decision.

What I like about this book is that it describes the proper methods for basic checkmates such as the infamous bishop+knight checkmate. Also, I like having access to more or less all known checkmate patterns collected in one volume.

Who should read this book?

If you are looking for the ultimate book on tactics, this is not what you are looking for. Instead, this book is great for getting acquainted with common mating patterns. The book is probably best for beginners, but it can also be used by intermediate players who feel the need to brush up on these issues. 

About this book

Author:Efstratios Grivas
Title:The Tactics Bible
Type of book:Tactics
Level:Beginner, Intermediate

Comments

Popular reviews

Judgement and planning

Some books "fly under the radar" and do not get the same attention as the evergreen classics. But sometimes, there is gold in old mines. And I found a little golden nugget while shopping for used books. A book written for amateurs, by (arguably) the best amateur of all time; former world champion Max Euwe. Sounds promising, right? If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron! What can you expect from this book? In my previous review of Chess Fundamentals , said that few world champions have written books for beginners and intermediate players. Capablanca is, of course, one exception. And another is Max Euwe. Euwe is not the most well-known world champion. He was in his prime in the 1930s and 1940s, most notably in 1935 when he dethroned none other than the great Alexander Alekhine. Although many have suggested that Alekhine only lost because of heavy use of alcohol, beating him is no small feat (rega...

Nunn’s secrets

Let me tell you a secret. There is no such thing as 'the best chess books'. It all depends on the preferences and expectations of the reader and of course the work s/he puts in when working with the book. So just because someone else claims that a certain book belongs in the 'best books of all time' category, it does not necessarily mean that it is a book that you will appreciate. This little intro may have given away the content of this review, but that's ok. Secrets of practical chess is an example of a book that has gotten a lot of praise on a more than one occasion. So let's dig in and see what the fuss is all about. What can you expect from this book? Secrets of practical chess has seemingly been well received in the chess world. Overall, the opinions are very positive. John Watson gave it a very positive review , and Jacob Aagaard has listed it among the top 10 books of the 20th century . It is also mentioned in another list of 'best' books ....

Understanding middlegames

Have you ever found yourself unable to find a move in the middlegame? Of course you have. We all have. About ten years ago, this was a recurring problem for me, which led to a lot of frustration. My conclusion was that I needed to learn how understand middlegames. So what better way than to read a book with the title Understanding Chess Middlegames ? Sound like the perfect remedy, right? Ok, let's find out. If you like these reviews, please consider supporting my work. Visit my patreon page for details. Become a Patron!   What can you expect from this book? I first read this book when I was just starting to study chess seriously. I bought it after reading a recommendation in an online forum. I would say this was ten years ago, but the book came out 2011, so it couldn't have been before that. Anyhow, my playing strength was probably around 1200 (I was unrated at the time) and I was having trouble choosing moves in non-tactical positions. Basically, I was playing without ...

Estimating playing strength

Have you ever felt like your chess rating doesn't represent your actual playing strength? Sometimes we want to be able to estimate playing strength based on individual games rather than rating (which changes more slowly). During the past few months, I've been taking a number of online courses and learning python for data analysis. In one of the courses, the final project allowed me to choose my own dataset. So surprise surprise! I chose something chess related. (Not really surprised, are you?) When we play games online, getting a computer evaluation is just a few clicks away. And a commonly used statistic is the average centipawn loss, or simply the average deviation from the computer's best move. Many of us tend to think that centipawn loss (CPL) is a good estimate of playing strength. And, of course, it gives some indication, but it's far from a perfect predictor. Fellow chess/statistics blogger Patrick Coulombe has investigated the correlation between rating and CPL ...

Thoughts on chess improvement

I was recently interviewed by Kevin Scull  for his podcast  Chess Journeys: Tales of Adult Improvement . When I got the request, I started thinking about what I have to contribute with in terms of improvement advice for chess players. I ended up creating a mindmap of it all, and thought I would share it with you along with an elaboration of what it means. Three questions for you In my opinion, there are three main questions that you need to ask yourself in order to find your  path to chess improvement: Why am I doing this? What will I focus on? How will I study? I have tried (and failed) myself, many times. And what I've realized is that you cannot copy other people's plans for improvement; you need to create a personalized plan that is adapted to your goals, your needs and your general life situation. Don't copy other people's improvement plans Start with WHY I've seen a lot of adult players describe their chess goals. Almost all of them are defined in...